You probably didn't look at the 2nd graph attached to that tweet...
Propaganda indeed.
lol
are you under the impression that the entire russia investigation hinges on one or two pieces of evidence?
Let me put it to you simply:
Say there are 1,000 pieces of evidence -
the prague mtg and manafort ecuadorian alleged mtg - turn out to be wrong....
that means there are still 998 pieces of evidence and about 950 of those show solid confirmed evidence of crimes.
the emperor ain’t got no clothes
Panic setting in...
Trump trying hard to say that - ''russia...if you're listening..."
was all a joke.
Not gonna work.
That was a solid piece of evidence of a conspiracy with the enemy that attacked us - in fact - that very same day that he said that in front of the world (July 27,2016) - was the very same day that Russia hacked later that evening.
Dude multiposts saying "panic setting in".
Meanwhile prognostication of an unseen report has swung from "probably nothing" to " is about to get real"
When it happens, then we'll talk about it. This has been about to get real now for 3 years.
Trump's Whiny Lies are Crushed By Senate Intel Vice-Chair:
'There's Plenty of Evidence' of Collusion
Last September
Burr told reporters that he had not seen any direct evidence of collusion
or conspiracy with Russia on the part of the President.
Note that he did not say it didn't happen, only that his committee had "no hard evidence" of it.
Sen. Mark Warner, the Vice-Chair of the Intelligence Committee appeared on CNN's State of the Union and explicitly contradicted Trump's distorted version of events (video below).
His remarks could not have been more clear:
"Anyone who says there's no evidence of collaboration -
there's plenty of evidence. [...]
The notion that there's no evidence is just factually wrong.
Just in the public domain there are literally reams and reams of evidence
of Russian outreach to Trump officials and
clear interest from Trump officials,
including the President's own son,
welcoming the opportunity to get dirt on Hillary Clinton."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
... looking forward to the very probably HARDER evidence of collusion not in the public domain.
Your daily defense of the criminal traitor fraud president is duly noted.
Thx!
That’s odd they don’t want Rosenstein to testify as he helped draft the letter to fire Comey.
And you’ll be wrong again then like usual
What’s your theory here?
Steele’s project was not intelligence-gathering. It was the crafting of a campaign narrative about a traitorous Trump–Russia espionage conspiracy, into which new developments were melded as they occurred. That’s why Steele and Simpson peddled the information to the media at the same time Steele was feeding it to the FBI and the Justice Department. Even Steele does not claim his reports were factual; in the British libel proceedings against him, he describes them as “unverified” “raw intelligence” that “warranted further investigation.”
The Clinton campaign’s Steele dossier was the sheer spinning of rank rumor.
Yawn.
I find it odd that one of the most important witnesses concerning the case for obstruction of justice isn’t being called by the House to testify.
Name one thing in the dossier Steele got right that wasn’t already publicly available.
Oh yeah -
Rosenstein was ORDERED by Trump to write a memo to JUSTIFY his pre-planned firing of comey -
then Trump also wrote his own memo stating his own reasons for firing Comey -
I would love for Rosenstein to go testify to that!
Especially since Rosenstein handed a copy of Trumps memo to McCabe - who handed it over to Mueller!
If you have any earlier sources for the privatization numbers for Rosneft, I'd love to see them.
For someone who claims to have never believed in Trump/Russian collusion you sure do spend a lot time trying to defend it.
So why wouldn’t the House call him to testify?Oh yeah -
Rosenstein was ORDERED by Trump to write a memo to JUSTIFY his pre-planned firing of comey -
then Trump also wrote his own memo stating his own reasons for firing Comey -
I would love for Rosenstein to go testify to that!
Especially since Rosenstein handed a copy of Trumps memo to McCabe - who handed it over to Mueller!
What’s your theory here?
I hope they do.
Answer my question. Directly. The one I asked weeks ago;
Why are you defending the president who defends the country that attacked the USA elections?
Or run like a pussy and spin the question.
Do you have an earlier source for the Rosneft privatization numbers, TSA?
Yes or no.
I don’t have one. Do you find it odd that out of that long list a main witness wouldn’t be called?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
