Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Spurs Homer]

Interesting thing that someone brought up is that if Trump stays... he gets to campaign on his record. He is such a bag, that having his name on the top of the ticket means Dems keep or add to their majority in time for the 2020 census district redrawing, as well as having a decent chance of taking the Senate. (Trump party has to defend far more seats in 2020 than the Dems)

Keeping Trump means that either the Trump party officials have to embrace him, or distance themselves trying to be Republicans again. either way it leads to infighting.

[RandomGuy]

And @ Pelosi’s super secret investigators

Seems like half the Republican party leadership photographed with a massage parlor sex pimp lady selling access to the President of the United States at the golf course/hotel that he owns and continues to profit from would be a scandal, right?

[Pavlov]

Seems like half the Republican party leadership photographed with a massage parlor sex pimp lady selling access to the President of the United States at the golf course/hotel that he owns and continues to profit from would be a scandal, right?

Dude that involves trafficking real women. Do you have any stories trafficking imaginary kids?

[Spurs Homer]

Dude that involves trafficking real women. Do you have any stories trafficking imaginary kids?

Lolololol

sadly
this is spot on!

[spurraider21]

Don't know who booboo is and...

yeah it really is nutz -

to want criminals prosecuted, traitors exposed and removed and the rule of law to prevail.

Really nutz to want to defend your country and call out sleeping people who continue to sleep while Russia/Trump destroys the usa from within.

I will take the "nut" label if this is where we are at.

boutons

[Spurs Homer]

boutons

look at his postings

pretty accurate if you are honest

never understood those comments - ive gone back to read his stuff and cannot find inaccuracies or distortions

[Chris]

TSA

[Chris]

[Chris]

[Chris]

Quiet up in here

[pgardn]

Quiet up in here

Could you please try and get an article from an even more disreputable source?
I dare you.

[pgardn]

look at his postings

pretty accurate if you are honest

never understood those comments - ive gone back to read his stuff and cannot find inaccuracies or distortions

Which is why he called you boo boo.

[Chris]

Could you please try and get an article from an even more disreputable source?
I dare you.

Are you disputing something, or is this a disconnect?

[TSA]

I already said what I'm doing with my screen name.

Are you going to make new alts based on my screen name?

If djohn disappears for good I might bring back TheSanityAnnex.

[TSA]

Comrade -

I did not say "secret investigators" (that is how conspiracy s think)

I said cover -

so that the investigations can continue without all these idiot reporters and conspiracy theorists like you can back off and the investigations can continue -

Pelosi will take the heat - and the investigations can continue unimpeded by panicked Trump traitor defenders like you.

And

No one lost confidence in Mueller - but here is the truth; the facts;

There are two reasons why Mueller will not confront Trump and force him to testify under oath:

1) Due to any kind of pressure from any of Trumps henchmen - and this WILL be a travesty of justice. If this is the reason that Mueller does not force the issue - JUSTICE will NOT have been served.

2) Mueller already has more than enough evidence to indict Trump - or to refer him to be indicted from another district like the SDNY - and he has decided to prosecute without Trump's testimony.

You better hope - as all traitors who are on Russia's side -

You better pray that it is #1 - because that is the only way that your hero gets off - for now -
(he will still be prosecuted after he leaves office though - too bad for you russian sympathizers)

If Mueller already has enough evidence to indict Trump as you claim there is no need for him to have Trump testify under oath. You’ve completely lost faith in Mueller and have hitched your wagon to Pelosi. Sad.

[TSA]

Could you please try and get an article from an even more disreputable source?
I dare you.

How about testimony from one of the FBI’s top lawyers James Baker?

Baker served as the FBI’s general counsel when the bureau investigated the Trump campaign, and also Hillary Clinton’s use of an unauthorized private email server. During two days of testimony on Oct. 3 and Oct. 18, he told lawmakers that he believed even toward the end of the Clinton investigation that she should have been charged over her “alarming, appalling” mishandling of classified information.

He argued with others, including then-FBI Director James Comey, about the issue all the way toward the end of the investigation, but was ultimately persuaded that Clinton should be exonerated.

“My original belief … after having conducted the investigation and towards the end of it, then sitting down and reading a binder of her materials, I thought that it was alarming, appalling, whatever words I said, and argued with others about why they thought she shouldn’t be charged,” Baker told lawmakers.

As of October 2018, almost two years after the Clinton probe concluded, Baker still believed that the conduct of the former secretary of state and her associates was “appalling,” with regard to the handling of classified information.

https://m.theepochtimes.com/transcri...e_2771370.html

[TSA]

look at his postings

pretty accurate if you are honest

never understood those comments - ive gone back to read his stuff and cannot find inaccuracies or distortions

your troll game is top notch

[Spurs Homer]

If Mueller already has enough evidence to indict Trump as you claim there is no need for him to have Trump testify under oath. You’ve completely lost faith in Mueller and have hitched your wagon to Pelosi. Sad.

That is what I am telling you - Mueller - if he does not force Trump to testify under oath -
that means he already has enough evidence.

If he says he does not have enough evidence - AND - on top of that he does not force trump to testify -

how can that be justice?

[TSA]

That is what I am telling you - Mueller - if he does not force Trump to testify under oath -
that means he already has enough evidence.

If he says he does not have enough evidence - AND - on top of that he does not force trump to testify -

how can that be justice?

Has it ever crossed your pea sized brain that Mueller does not have evidence because nothing criminal happened between Trump and Russia?

[TSA]

Could you please try and get an article from an even more disreputable source?
I dare you.

Need any more?

[TSA]

[TSA]

[Chris]

Need any more?

CHAAAAARGE!

[Chris]

[Spurs Homer]

Has it ever crossed your pea sized brain that Mueller does not have evidence because nothing criminal happened between Trump and Russia?

Sure -

then it should be no problem at all to have Trump testify under oath and clear his name.

Trump could have done that a year ago and saved the entire country a whole lot of trouble - couldn't he?

If this was Obama - you bet your ass that you and your cult would have lost their ing minds if Obama had avoided testifying under oath.

Just what we have witnessed in full public view - is already Obstruction of Justice - so there is just absolutely zero chance that Mueller can just overlook Obstruction of Justice - because we have all seen it with our own eyes.