Reply With Quote
Don't @ me with your trollin'.
I just showed you the proof the SCO investigation is a counterintelligence operation in plain text.
What is your interpretation of those words, TSA?
Be specific.
Don't @ me with your trollin'.
ive been pointing it out
comrade tsa is given direct proof
and he just refuses to believe his eyes
the brainwashing runs deeep!
Yiu showed me an improperly assigned SCO.
“To be clear, the special counsel regulations require the existence of a factual basis for a criminal investigation — a crime — before a prosecutor is assigned. Moreover, a special counsel, who by regulation is recruited from outside the government, is not supposed to be assigned absent a Department of Justice (DOJ) conflict of interest so profound that the department is ethically barred from investigating the crime in question.
Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein could satisfy neither of these conditions. To this day, he has never specified a crime the president is suspected of committing. And there is no conflict; Mueller not only recruited prosecutors from the Justice Department, he has transitioned the two Russia indictments he’s brought to Justice Department components.
Both of these actions would be improper if there were an actual conflict. But, of course, there isn’t one because, again, Rosenstein has not specified a crime. It is the crime allegedly committed by a president that creates a conflict for the president’s Justice Department and calls for an outside prosecutor.
Nevertheless, Rosenstein also knew that the regulations expressly create no enforceable rights against the Justice Department — i.e., no one, not even a federal court, can compel DOJ to follow the rules. So, despite the mandate that there be a basis for a criminal investigation, the deputy attorney general assigned Mueller to conduct a counterintelligence investigation, which the regulations do not authorize. Counterintelligence is not prosecutor work; it is about gathering information on the potentially threatening activities of foreign powers, not prosecuting criminal suspects.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...uit-of-justice
That is not your interpretation of those words.
What is your interpretation of those words?
Be specific.
o Tony Podesta and Greg Craig.
them boys said SEVERAL!
An SCO was appointed improperly.
That is not your interpretation of those words.
What is your interpretation of those words?
Be specific.
I’m sorry you don’t like the answer.
It wasn't an answer at all.
I'm sorry you didn't like the question.
It's a counterintelligence investigation and there's nothing you can do about it.
You can call it whatever you want but it was never a proper investigation to begin with.It wasn't an answer at all.
I'm sorry you didn't like the question.
It's a counterintelligence investigation and there's nothing you can do about it.
It's a counterintelligence investigation.
I don't know why you're so against things being investigated all the sudden.
he is inventing alternate facts to make them fit his wish that his cult leader can be determined to beIt wasn't an answer at all.
I'm sorry you didn't like the question.
It's a counterintelligence investigation and there's nothing you can do about it.
above the law
fbi went by the book
trump got rid of mccabe
but mccabe sealed trumps fate before leaving
not a damn thing can be done about it
by anyone
It's so odd that McCarthy can't even think of a single crime that was committed that everyone in the country knew about save him and TSA.
But that's just how they roll.
"Songbird"
mccain and good riddance you fraud!
So we have about five different conspiracies here.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede...eport-will-say
Conspiring with Russia: Donald Trump, his campaign, his organization and his associates knew of the intent of the Russian Federation to carry out the Russian Intervention as early as November 2015. Upon learning of that intent, instead of alerting the FBI to the likelihood of a foreign government trying to commit a crime, Donald Trump, his campaign, his organization and his associates illegally conspired throughout the 2016 presidential election to encourage and enable the Russia Intervention. The result was to defraud the American people of a free and fair election.
The Moscow Trump Tower Project: Donald Trump, his campaign, his organization and his associates illegally conspired to expand its involvement with Russia beyond the Russian Intervention itself, through efforts from November 2015 at least until June 2016, to negotiate and build the Moscow Trump Tower Project. The Project, if realized, would bring “hundreds of millions of dollars from Russian sources in licensing fees and other revenues” to Donald Trump, his organization and some of his associates.
Currying Favor with Russia: The Moscow Project “was a lucrative business opportunity,” the Special Counsel notes, “that sought, and likely required, the assistance of the Russian government.” Accordingly, Donald Trump, his campaign, his organization and his associates illegally conspired to curry favor with the Russian Federation in order to facilitate the Moscow Trump Tower Project and to promote their own financial interests, thus depriving the American people both of a free and fair election and of an independent government solely devoted to their interests.
Hiding the conspiracies: Donald Trump, his campaign, his organization and his associates illegally conspired to hide (1), (2) and (3) from the American people and to lie about them to Congress. According to the court filing, this was done “in order to (1) minimize links between the Moscow Project and [Donald Trump] and (2) give the false impression that the Moscow Project had ended before the Iowa caucus and the first presidential primaries, in hopes of limiting the ongoing Russia investigations being conducted by Congress and the [Special Counsel’s Office].”
Enabling hard kompromat: Through Trump’s lies to the American people, of which the Russian Federation was aware, Trump made the U.S. Presidency a potential victim of blackmail (aka kompromat) at the hands of the Russian Federation and in so doing illegally compromised the legitimate interests of the American people.
After all of that we still have obstruction of justice.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevede...eport-will-sayObstruction Of Justice
The New York Times recently summarized the hundreds of actions and statements by President Trump that are apparent attempts to obstruct justice, amounting to a two-year campaign of intimidation, pressure and humiliation. The sheer volume of the evidence is overwhelming. According to the New York Times:
Julie O’Sullivan, a criminal law professor at Georgetown University, said she believed there was ample public evidence that Mr. Trump had the “corrupt intent” to try to derail the Mueller investigation, the legal standard for an obstruction of justice case.
But this is far from a routine criminal investigation, she said, and Mr. Mueller will have to make judgments about the effect on the country of making a criminal case against the president.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
