Reply With Quote
That video I posted explains exactly where she's coming from. She's an actress.
she's a pawn of the ME. lmao
That video I posted explains exactly where she's coming from. She's an actress.
she's a PR firms brain child with no brains.
umm... wasn't that exactly the point of the US revolution? take the power and wealth away from the crown and give it to the people? no taxation without representation, etc
Wealthy people \= "the crown"
Try again.
i'll agree that the economic aspect is a bit more of a stretch when making that comparison, but i dont think its invalid altogether. colonists were being unfairly taxed compared to people living in england. they fought for representation (democracy) to level the playing field
You want to penalize people for hoarding wealth. That's absolutely ludicrous.
Saikat Chakrabarti and Cenk Uygur, the Council on Foreign Relations
stimulating the economy bad now
CMON KIDS LETS SKIP CLASS!
Lol Chris chiding young people for seeking relief from liberal indoctrination in school.
"Cmon kids vote for me! We're gonna change the legal voting age to 16 and I'll upgrade your Obama phone to an iPad shipped directly from China! Once we eliminate the Electoral College we will never lose an election again! Diversity is our strength!"
Pure emotive prose.
That’s not an answer.
If 16 year olds can go to big boy jail for their actions, why can’t they vote?
Seems there are varying, more or less arbitrary, legal definitions of adult responsibility.
Would you raise the voting age back to 21?
If so, why?
I'm sure you were cognizant of worldly affairs and all the corruption that exists within politics at age 16. I bet you had it all figured out and knew which candidates were the good ones that aligned with your policies. So refined and mature humans beings at age 16.
So, at 18 we all magically know better?
How absurd.
Never said such.
So why not draw the line at at 16?
Criminal justice does.
I've already explained all that. I don't do circular arguments.
You’ve explained nothing.
What is it 18 year olds have that 16 year olds don’t?
Your argument is nothing if not circular so far.
Why stop there? How about 12?
why set the bar so low at 18? why not 26?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions