Reply With Quote
Define Q.
Also...
You believed in Russiagate.
Looks like you still do tbh.
Do you still believe in Russiagate?
Yes with the public.Isn't the SOP not to discuss active investigations?
muh letters
Define Q.
Also...
You believed in Russiagate.
Looks like you still do tbh.
Do you still believe in Russiagate?
Why should they disclose to Congress?
Huber told them to go themselves so they had a couple of conspiracy theorists testify instead.
The Q you said you believed in earlier.
Define Russiagate.Also...
You believed in Russiagate.
Looks like you still do tbh.
Do you still believe in Russiagate?
I've already told you multiple times what my conspiracy theory is.
That’s one of the stupider questions I’ve ever seen you ask. Get some sleep dude.
Just answer it.
Why should they disclose to Congress?
Huber told them to go themselves so they had a couple of conspiracy theorists testify instead.
Huber bad now?
There's only so much he can say tbh I like his use of journalism snippets and tidbits though to give us clues.
Why, Qhris?
He's the president. He can declassify and/or publicize anything he wants.
What is holding him back?
They discuss ongoing investigations with Congress all the time you dip .
Huber told them to go themselves so they had a couple of conspiracy theorists testify instead.
Why should they disclose this one to Congress because muh letter?
Explain.
The Mueller investigation you dip . If he declassifies now stupid s like you will cry obstruction.
I'm sure you will see lots of action after the Mueller report gets released. Another one of his attorneys left so I imagine that won't be much longer. You trying to educate me on what the President can declassify is cute considering we (TSA and I) have been talking about that for over a year.
...and TSA beat me to it
What would he be obstructing?
Explain.
Also, this is your latest Qicking the Qan down the road.
You bring up Huber as if it has any significance to the investigation in question
Tap out dude. Get some sleep.
So he's afraid of Mueller?
You’d be the one crying about obstruction, I’d just be laughing at you because I wouldn’t see the obstruction.What would he be obstructing?
Explain.
Also, this is your latest Qicking the Qan down the road.
They requested an update just like muh letter did.You bring up Huber as if it has any significance to the investigation in question
Huber bad now?
This is your tapping out dude. It's clear they can be told to off by those investigating because Huber did it, so explain why they should disclose to muh letter.Tap out dude. Get some sleep.
You're saying there would be no obstruction -- so what is stopping Trump again?
Explain.
It’s clear they are also not told to off and are updated on investigations regularly. Do you believe the FBI operates independently?
Like which ones?
Do you believe the FBI operates independently?
Do you think Congress runs the FBI?
Already answered. This is boring and you seem extra desperate tonight.
It was not answered.
You said there would be no obstruction at all.
So what is holding Trump back? Perceived public opinion of people who already don't like him?
That's an extra desperate dodge tbh.
I used the search function and read what seem to be the portions relevant to the discussion. Can you point me to the page where he specifically said August 30?Had you actually read what I quoted your answer would have been
nice job 21
you know Ohr was very non committal, yet you haven’t read the whole thing lol
just because the acting director of the FBI had Steele’s reporting doesn’t mean the “FBI” had Steele’s reporting lol
and i didn’t say the “fbi” didn’t have his reporting. Why are you intentionally misquoting me?
I’m not searching for the page number. Find the section where Ohr testified that he met with Steele and then brought Steele’s report to McCabe’s office while Lisa Page was there.
Are you now saying the “FBI” did have his reporting?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions