:cry No collusion? :cry

[DMC]

Even more so that he’d leave a trail of evidence that could get him convicted.

The narratives about Trump are also getting inherently contradictory. The same people claiming he ran as a publicity stunt for his brand and didn’t actually expect to win the election (what I believe) also claim he was willing to collude with Russia and open himself up to criminal liability in order to help his chances..

Same people who think he's dumber than Hillary think he could collude with Russia to win the oval office over her while she couldn't keep her private server secure as sec of state.

[DMC]

If there was no crime of collusion to begin with then how could justice have been obstructed?

Investigations can be obstructed. Justice is in discovery as well.

[rmt]

Over 1500 pages of circle jerking delusion from the Trump fan club and this is the climax. Even if you hate the president you'd have to have been delusional to think he'd actually collude with Russia

On the other end, I never did see why Russia would want Trump over Hillary because of oil - Trump's for fracking, pipelines, more US oil/gas.

[Winehole23]

Witch hunter Mueller didn't get the witch.

lol 14 angry Dems.

lol DEEP STATE CONSPIRACY.

[rmt]

Maybe disruption/chaos? Or just against who they expected to win?

[Winehole23]

Maybe disruption/chaos? Or just against who they expected to win?

if the whole point was to prevent Trump from winning, why did they wait until after the election to mention it to anyone other than US Senators and Reps?

[pgardn]

Media's sandwich is well deserved. And they need to eat every last bite.

Which media?

They have been guessing just like anyone else.
What exactly is the sandwich for?

djohn was told a long, long time ago in his own thread that collusion was a huge stretch. But that obstruction of justice and financial irregularities might be exposed. Those are all still a legal possibility now. There was no question that there were lies about the extent of financial dealings. We all know we have a lying president who is afraid to disclose because he has too many dealings that MIGHT indicate conflict of interest. Obstruction of justice vs. a president throwing around his weight legally has been tested. God help us if a radical from the other side is elected president. Hopefully the blue team does not go along like lap dogs.

This collusion thing was about as likely as Trump finding his 3 million illegal votes. The Democrats knew this as well claiming they just did not know for sure. But were happy that Mueller dug his hand into Trump financial insides. The Republicans never talked much about the financial problem, just sticking with the much safer no collusion.

The biggest surprise for the media that I read is that Donald's kids did not get hit by Mueller. That is by far the biggest surprise. But now its not so much of a surprise considering how dead to rights Mueller had Manafort et al... really a slam dunk, just hoping they got a proper judge. We had an extremely careful and thorough man at the helm of all this which is very good imo.

2020 is looking mighty important. We dont need to function through other ins utions due to a nutty liar for 4 more years. But we dont need a vengeance backlash from the blue team that red team has clearly shown. Imagine if Boots/Bonnerific gets their way... Cops getting their payback and more fun stuff...

[DMC]

Which media?

They have been guessing just like anyone else.
What exactly is the sandwich for?

djohn was told a long, long time ago in his own thread that collusion was a huge stretch. But that obstruction of justice and financial irregularities might be exposed. Those are all still a legal possibility now. There was no question that there were lies about the extent of financial dealings. We all know we have a lying president who is afraid to disclose because he has too many dealings that MIGHT indicate conflict of interest. Obstruction of justice vs. a president throwing around his weight legally has been tested. God help us if a radical from the other side is elected president. Hopefully the blue team does not go along like lap dogs.

This collusion thing was about as likely as Trump finding his 3 million illegal votes. The Democrats knew this as well claiming they just did not know for sure. But were happy that Mueller dug his hand into Trump financial insides. The Republicans never talked much about the financial problem, just sticking with the much safer no collusion.

The biggest surprise for the media that I read is that Donald's kids did not get hit by Mueller. That is by far the biggest surprise. But now its not so much of a surprise considering how dead to rights Mueller had Manafort et al... really a slam dunk, just hoping they got a proper judge. We had an extremely careful and thorough man at the helm of all this which is very good imo.

2020 is looking mighty important. We dont need to function through other ins utions due to a nutty liar for 4 more years. But we dont need a vengeance backlash from the blue team that red team has clearly shown. Imagine if Boots/Bonnerific gets their way... Cops getting their payback and more fun stuff...

Gas lighting

[pgardn]

Gas lighting

From the guy who makes some of the most blantant switch the narrative of the poster arguments.

Laughable you call any argument out.

[DMC]

From the guy who makes some of the most blantant switch the narrative of the poster arguments.

Laughable you call any argument out.

Not related to gas lighting

[koriwhat]

Haha you ing pussies!

[Brazil]

celebrating the no collusion and forgetting Mueller pretty much demonstrated that Trump worked his whole life with felons and criminals

[Winehole23]

Alphonse D'Amato is the only modern US pol I can think of who's as mobbed up as Trump.

Lil help?

[pgardn]

Not related to gas lighting

Yes.

It is.

You labeled an argument.

So before I virtue signal again, do I need to go moral mountaineering with an amoral sherpa?
Is there a name for a person who peruses the internet for the next "in" phrase to describe another poster's posting?
Or do you just collect and list...

[Winehole23]

Yeah, the comment was unclear.

Who were you gaslighting, pgardn?

[DMC]

Yes.

It is.

You labeled an argument.

So before I virtue signal again, do I need to go moral mountaineering with an amoral sherpa?
Is there a name for a person who peruses the internet for the next "in" phrase to describe another poster's posting?
Or do you just collect and list...

Do you know what gas lighting means?

[pgardn]

Yeah, the comment was unclear.

Who were you gaslighting, pgardn?

Apparently The entire board.

And my wife.

[pgardn]

Do you know what gas lighting means?

Yes.
Im not that good.

You, of all people, should know this.
Remember I type in phrases shrouded in mystery and incompetence.

[hater]

celebrating the no collusion and forgetting Mueller pretty much demonstrated that Trump worked his whole life with felons and criminals

Bolsonaro

Macron


Both criminals MakeTrump look like mother Theresa

[pgardn]

Bolsonaro

Macron


Both criminals MakeTrump look like mother Theresa

Yet Kim and Assad are bad asses and to be admired.
You are such a fake humanitarian.

[hater]

[Winehole23]

Apparently The entire board.

And my wife.

DMC hasn’t said who. It’s anybody’s guess.

[DMC]

Yes.
Im not that good.

You, of all people, should know this.
Remember I type in phrases shrouded in mystery and incompetence.

You're responding to it by saying I also do it but then give examples of anything but. Red herrings aren't the same as gaslighting.

[DMC]

DMC hasn’t said who. It’s anybody’s guess.

It's hilarious watching you folks pretend that you were "no collusion" all along.



Take the L and off.

[Chucho]

It's hilarious watching you folks pretend that you were "no collusion" all along.



Take the L and off.

That's right. Let's tell them!