Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[spurraider21]

no need to pardon him. he's going to withdraw his guilty plea any minute now tbh

judge sullivan
brady orders

[Pavlov]

Is he going to pay with the pardon?

[hater]

[TSA]

Also:

Said as much in the very beginning (mar 2018) that the more important things were the conflicts of interest and potential violations of the cons ution. Not nearly as sexy for the TSA/Chris crowd.

The Russia thing was intensely pushed back on by the right wing media, because it was something they could win on, and ignored. So that was what got covered.

the Russiagate hoax was shoved down our throats 24/7 for 3 years by the MSM...because the right wing media pushed back

You have ing lost it dude. You’re a s of yourself, Trump broke you.

[Winehole23]

Only two years.

TSA exaggerates by at least 33%.

[spurraider21]

wasnt until march 2017 when there was any public announcement of an investigation into the trump campaign

[boutons_deux]

A Dem House gonna impeach private citizen Obama?

goddamn, you rightwingnutjobs are in stupid

[TSA]

Only two years.

TSA exaggerates by at least 33%.

Winehole exaggerates his math.

[Spurs Homer]

Still no one has seen one sentence of the mueller report

only

the barr report

trumps handpicked henchman

[DarrinS]

Still no one has seen one sentence of the mueller report

only

the barr report

trumps handpicked henchman

Keep hope alive.

[DarrinS]

Still no one has seen one sentence of the mueller report

only

the barr report

trumps handpicked henchman

Keep hope alive.

[koriwhat]

Pardon coming in 1-2-3...

[koriwhat]

trumps handpicked henchman

The crybaby narrative boo inghoo

[Winehole23]

Winehole exaggerates his math.

spurraider21 with the fact check one above your post.

you exaggerrated.

[Winehole23]

But you're right about my math: you exaggerated by 50%.

Difference between two and three. I minimized your exaggeration.

[Spurtacular]

FBI and DOJ good now.

They got exposed, bruh. Do you think they're good?

[Winehole23]

They had good reason to look into it. The failure to indict may not indicate only the lack of evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt, it reflects the policy of the DOJ not to indict sitting Presidents.

If it was a witch hunt, why did they fail to burn the witch?

[Spurtacular]

They had good reason to look into it. The failure to indict may not indicate only the lack of evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt, it reflects the policy of the DOJ not to indict sitting Presidents.

If it was a witch hunt, why did they fail to burn the witch?

There's a policy? Can you cite it?

[Spurtacular]

They had good reason to look into it. The failure to indict may not indicate only the lack of evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt, it reflects the policy of the DOJ not to indict sitting Presidents.

If it was a witch hunt, why did they fail to burn the witch?

It had the markings of a witch hunt. But apparently it was too much of a nothing burger all the same....

[Winehole23]

Mueller didn't overreach the charge given him. He fulfilled it without overreaching.

No further indictments.

[Winehole23]

It had the markings of a witch hunt. But apparently it was too much of a nothing burger all the same....

OJ was found not guilty, do you consider that an exoneration?

[Spurtacular]

OJ was found not guilty, do you consider that an exoneration?

I consider it an acquittal.

[Winehole23]

So, not exoneration.

We agree on that.

[Spurtacular]

So, not exoneration.

We agree on that.

Very technically, it could be considered an exoneration; but that sort of overlooks the fact that OJ is guilty AF.

Any point to this tangent?

[Winehole23]

There's a policy? Can you cite it?

Odd you’re not familiar, but sure, gimme a sec.

Lemme hit this weed first.