Reply With Quote
Now Mueller, Mueller's 24 lawyers, 40 FBI agents and Barr are all liars covering up for Trump...
ing delusional...
Yes, because I don't believe this latest cover up from the con man and fox news to try and evade legal prosecution -. Even more delusional than boutons.
because I would rather see the Mueller report - NOT - the Barr report.
The guy that lied over 9000 times - hires a henchman - and you believe THIS con too -
yet - I'm
the delusional one lol.
Why is Barr hiding the report now?
Why did Mitch McConnell block a vote to release the full Mueller report - if trump is "exonerated?"
Why are you taking Barr's word that Trump did not collude or obstruct?
Now Mueller, Mueller's 24 lawyers, 40 FBI agents and Barr are all liars covering up for Trump...
ing delusional...
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on his investigation’s findings has not been made public — all we have so far is a four-page letter by Attorney General Bill Barr summarizing those findings.
Most of that letter is in Barr’s own words. And some Democrats are skeptical about whether Barr is characterizing the special counsel’s conclusions accurately, or leaving out important information.
But there are a few places where the attorney general quotes from the Mueller report itself — that is, where he quotes Mueller’s own words. For one, Barr reveals its le: “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.” He also has the following quotes from the body of the report.
1) “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
Barr presents this as the big “no collusion” quote. And indeed, Mueller is saying in his own words that his probe “did not establish” any conspiracy or coordination between Donald Trump’s campaign members and the Russian government to interfere with the election.
What surrounds that quote — and even how the quoted sentence begins — isn’t clear. Is Mueller saying that there was absolutely nothing to any Trump-Russia collusion allegations? Or is it more along the lines of, there was some concerning evidence but not enough to “establish” a conspiracy?
2) “Coordination” [is defined as an] “agreement — tacit or express — between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.”
This is just Barr quoting, in a footnote, Mueller’s definition of “coordination”. It clarifies that Mueller wasn’t just looking for an “express” agreement between Trump’s team and the Russians, but also a potential “tacit” one.
Delusional media won't give it up. It's up to politicians in Washington to start opening their eyes and see that there's an election coming next year
Nope - not what I said or what I have been saying;
Now Mueller, Mueller's 24 lawyers, 40 FBI agents and Barr are all liars covering up for Trump...
ing delusional...
I would trust Muellers report - when I see Muellers report.
Mueller could have said something way different than what Barr spun.
I said Barr - and Trump - are in a cover up.
Barr could have choked the life out of Muellers investigation and pressured Mueller to wrap up early.
Many things are fishy.
Release the full Mueller report.
Have Mueller testify under oath. (also Rosenstein) -
I don't give a about Barr testifying because he will just lie or evade answering. He already said that even if he was advised to recuse - he would not.
You sound like FOX news - distorting the words I wrote.
Mueller supposedly decided not to make a conclusion. (on Obstruction)
(WHY? - Did Barr tell him to leave it open? Did Mueller leave it open - so that Congress could make the call?
Did Barr give Mueller a strict set of rules to keep Mueller from making a conclusion? Did Barr misrepresent Muellers report?)
RUSSIA: HOW DARE YOU DRAG TRUMP INTO OUR CRIMES
Sure, the Kremlin attempted to throw the U.S. election. But it never got Trump involved!
Mueller found
Russia aggressively attempted to meddle in the election,
both through a disinformation campaign “to sow social discord” and
“computer hacking operations designed to gather and disseminate information to influence the election.”
In the end, the Kremlin apparently failed to get anyone from the campaign to go along with its efforts,
“despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
For the outraged Russian politicians claiming the Kremlin has been vindicated by the investigation, though, that’s a distinction not worth mentioning!
all three of these men seem to be focusing on the fact that Mueller found no evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia,
rather than his findings that
Russia attempted—many times!—to get the campaign to collude.
Anyway, the Kremlin wants an apology, and it wants one now.
And what better way for Uncle Sam to show he cares than by turning the other cheek when it comes to 2020 election meddling that may or may n
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03/russia-how-dare-you-drag-trump-into-our-election-meddling-crimes-mueller-report?mbid=nl_th_5c9974561c3519239055da5d&utm_sou rce=nl&utm_medium=email&utm_brand=vf&utm_mailing=v yf_hive_news_20190326%20(1)&bxid=MzI5MjgzNzg1MjQ4S 0&hasha=992d608214b505003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542 eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3ccf3faae18526a77bd&spMailingID= 15352451&spUserID=MzI5MjgzNzg1MjQ4S0&spJobID=16019 47168&spReportId=MTYwMTk0NzE2OAS2
“A CRIME IN PUBLIC VIEW”: HOW WILLIAM BARR PARDONED DONALD TRUMP
Trump had plenty of reasons to obstruct Mueller’s investigation, whether or not there was an underlying crime. The most obvious one has been staring us in the face all along.
Attorney General William Barr’s summary of special counsel Robert Mueller’s conclusions, in the fancy language of lawyers,
impeaches itself.
That means that
its own words and reasoning call some of Barr’s conclusions into doubt,
particularly Barr’s eagerness to say that Donald Trump can’t be proven to have obstructed justice.
the attorney general’s eagerness to clear Trump of possible obstruction of justice,
after having the report in hand for less than 48 hours,
is unbecoming of his office and Mueller’s two-year investigation.
Furthermore, some of the reasoning in his letter is clearly deeply flawed.
To argue that no underlying crime means no obstruction is therefore nonsense.
That is fallacious reasoning and it
impugns Barr’s integrity and his reputation as a lawyer.
Worse, it represents
a troubling effort to paper over the acknowledged evidence that Mr. Trump committed a crime in public view.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019...YwMTk0NzE2OAS2
Barr's "reputation" among Repugs was that he covered up Reagan's Iran-Contra crimes, so he was top of the list to cover up Trash's crimes
For 2 years, why did Trash and his mafiya "forget", lie, obstruct their Russian connections?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 03-26-2019 at 10:53 AM.
Hilarious TDS.
William Barr Reads “Moby- ,” Finds No Evidence of Whales
WASHINGTON —Attorney General William Barr has just read the classic American novel “Moby- ,” by Herman Melville, and found that the book contains “no evidence whatsoever of whales,” Barr stated on Tuesday.
The Attorney General issued his statement on the absence of whales in the Melville classic in a two-paragraph book report released to the news media.
“Those who read ‘Moby- ’ looking for whales will be sorely disappointed,” Barr wrote.
“There are no whales here.”
To illustrate his point, Barr quoted the book’s first sentence: “Call me Ishmael.”
“As you can clearly see, that sentence does not have a whale in it,” Barr wrote.
The Attorney General indicated that
he hoped his report would put an end to “reckless speculation” about the existence of whales in “Moby- .”
“It’s time to move on,” he wrote.
Barr disclosed that, after waiting years to read “Moby- ,”
he was able to finish reading it in approximately fifteen minutes.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/william-barr-reads-moby- -finds-no-evidence-of-whales
Bannon: With Mueller probe over, Trump ‘is going to go full animal’
https://www.yahoo.com/news/bannon-wi...194747346.html
Bannon's right, Trash and the Repugs will now relentlessly destroy even more of America and govt than they have these past two years.
And the destruction will not be reversible.
The End Is Nigh
Could you please just off already? People like you are a major reason this gasbag got elected in the first place. You just blowing everything out of proportion and making apocalyptic predictions helps no one.
OK, pollyanna CD, let's see how more ed up America is, by Trash and the Repugs, 18 months from now.
and it sure looks like the oligarchy's SCOTUS5 s are going to allow partisan gerrymandering
Yes I agree, he’ll continue being atrocious, probably with more confidence than ever before. That’s why you get out and vote. You don’t need to spend your damn day copy/pasting links no one ever clicks
As opposed to what?
The idiots that see crimes and lies and ery with their own eyes and then DEFEND it?
Is that the answer?
Stop calling out the criminals ery?
I didn’t say that. Of course he should be called out, he’s an embarrassment. Boutons shares 15 links a day that no one asked for and spouts dramatic hyperbole like “the end is nigh”. This is not a ing Shakespearean tragedy; go vote in ‘20.
Boutons contributes no meaningful analysis, no original ideas. Throughout his 70,000 posts, there has been nothing of merit. He is no better than ducks.
You can ignore his posts. I have read them - and sorry to burst your narrative - but his posts have pretty accurate info -
or you can point out the inaccuracies - I bet you will not find many.
As far as his hyperbole - well - I get your point - but it doesn't bother me - as most posters here use hyperbole on a worse level 24/7.
ducks sometimes tries to speak his opinion. its usually logically unsound and grammatically incomprehensible, but he'll try.
booboo is just a one man echo chamber. i've had him on ignore for the longest time, and it makes the political forum so much easier to navigate, rather than having to constantly scroll through articles that nobody wants to read. i mean he's basically chris but with walls of texts instead of tweets. chris will sometimes give his own takes too, but its usually with respect to conspiracy theories about secret societies and satan, etc
Establishment Dems are already shutting down, prohibiting, black listing progressive candidates, to prevent any more AOCs
Uhhh dumbass....by definition gerrymandering is always partisan. You love the out of it when blue team does it.
hey dumbass
RACIAL gerrymandering was illegal until the SCOTUS5 gutted VRA, Kennedy, from his ivory tower of ignorance, saying effectively, there was no more racism in USA, so racial gerrymandering could proceed. the VRA racist states RACED
Partisan gerrymandering is degrading ALL (not just black) peoples' votes because they support the other party.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
