Mueller Delivers Report on Russia Investigation to Attorney General

[Chucho]

Except...

no one has seen the investigation findings.

We saw a

Con man

appoint a henchman - who also did this for ANOTHER REPUBLICAN president -
write a flattering summary of his con man cult dadddy

NO ONE has seen the results of the investigation - yet the CON MAN has convinced his CULT that all is well - all is well -

look that way - health care, 2020 election - just look over there!

Criminals = commit crimes.
Pathological liars = lie.
Con men = perpetuate CONS on gullible blind people.
Cult leaders = cast spells on their brainwashed cult followers.


Mark those words. This is really really obvious.

The criminal traitor knew his time was getting near -

was he going to wait?

Nope - not when he has a right wing cult who will give him a head start and spin that narrative
"exonerated" "russian hoax"

while still refusing to show the actual "exoneration do ents"

He stood on Air Force One - told YOU to your face - that he had zero to do with the porn star and the payoffs $$ - to YOUR face. YOU saw with YOUR EYES - the actual CHECKS SIGNED BY YOUR CULT DADDY -

and here you sit with YOUR words defending the guy who lied to YOUR face.

Sorry - if it bothers YOU that I will not fall for the con man - or a ing word he says.

tl;dr- mainly because you're re ed.

[TSA]

FACTS


Look - I get it - if Trump is truly innocent - it is great for the country. It would be a nice thing if he did not sell out the country and I would give him credit.

Unfortunately - there is this little thing called -

Witnessing obstruction and conspiracy with our own eyes and hearing Trumps treasonous words with our own ears.

So -

I want to see and hear Muellers words as to a few things;
1) Why did you end the investigation as soon as Barr became AG? Who decided to end it? Were you completely done - or were you advised that you had to close it up?
2) Why did you refrain from making a decision on obstruction?
3) Do you - 100% - agree with Barr's summary of YOUR report?
4) Why include Manafort delivering "campaign polling data" to a russian spy - and write on your indictment that this was "central to the case of the Russia conspiracy investigation?" - Why include that in the indictment - and then "conclude" that there was no collusion? (Barr concluded - but maybe Mueller did NOT?)
5) I want to see ALL the witness testimony of the people interviewed regarding Trump obstructing justice. The witnesses who were there when Trump crafted a FALSE reason ("adoptions") for his son meeting with russian spies? Surely these witnesses did NOT all corroborate that Trump is squeaky clean and lied about this for no goddamn reason. Surely these witnesses stepped all over trumps lies?


There are volumes of evidence of who and when the russians "outreach" to campaign members - happened - and the result of it.

If the Russians reached out and tried - and NO ONE on trump team reported it to the FBI - what the does Mueller have to say about that? Why is no one charged with concealing these efforts from an enemy? Is this just a non-chargable innocent thing? Will all campaigns in the future be allowed to meet with enemy gov'ts and get "pitched" some tasty "oppo research?"

WTF

There are a million reasons...

Helsinki -

WHAT THE - did Mueller conclude about that? Did Mueller obtain the INTERPRETERS NOTES????
What the did Putin say to Trump in that secret meeting that would cause Trump to walk out of that meeting - looking ing terrified and docile as a ing lamb - and profess - FIDELITY TO MOTHER RUSSIA?????


How the does the USA intel - NOT - obtain the facts of that treasonous disgraceful chapter in our countrys history?????


Why is everyone - OK - with just allowing this criminal to get away with all this ?

Yeah buddy - this is not a "regular" political scandal like the many we have lived through - this is the ONE that needs to be exposed 100%.

You swallowed up their lies whole.

[Spurs Homer]

Trump semen-shielding ^

[Spurs Homer]

You swallowed up their lies whole.

Except - they weren't based on those people -

they were based on my own eyes and ears.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44852812


Sadly - for you -

you believe a con man - over your own eyes and ears and have never seen the evidence but swallow the con man narrative whole.

Give that some thought.

[TSA]

a lot of the obstruction stuff is public knowledge though. his firing of comey, public comments about the wanting to end the investigation, and alleged attempts to affect witness testimony through his public statements. as far as im aware its really just interpreting those actions. but maybe there was more behind the scenes stuff we're not privy to. attempts to curtail funding, etc

Doesn't sound like it.

“In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that “the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference,” and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction…”

[boutons_deux]

Trash's cult mob are so willfully conned, so ing stupid.

Trash is a traitor, sworn to the Cons ution, disloyal to his country, and loyal to Pootin and Russia

Fully qualified as impeachable, and Dems MUST impeach him to get all his into the Congressional Record forever.

[TSA]

Except - they weren't based on those people -

they were based on my own eyes and ears.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44852812


Sadly - for you -

you believe a con man - over your own eyes and ears and have never seen the evidence but swallow the con man narrative whole.

Give that some thought.

No, I believe your ex-GOD Mueller.

[koriwhat]

Except...

no one has seen the investigation findings.

We saw a

Con man

appoint a henchman - who also did this for ANOTHER REPUBLICAN president -
write a flattering summary of his con man cult dadddy

NO ONE has seen the results of the investigation - yet the CON MAN has convinced his CULT that all is well - all is well -

look that way - health care, 2020 election - just look over there!

Criminals = commit crimes.
Pathological liars = lie.
Con men = perpetuate CONS on gullible blind people.
Cult leaders = cast spells on their brainwashed cult followers.


Mark those words. This is really really obvious.

The criminal traitor knew his time was getting near -

was he going to wait?

Nope - not when he has a right wing cult who will give him a head start and spin that narrative
"exonerated" "russian hoax"

while still refusing to show the actual "exoneration do ents"

He stood on Air Force One - told YOU to your face - that he had zero to do with the porn star and the payoffs $$ - to YOUR face. YOU saw with YOUR EYES - the actual CHECKS SIGNED BY YOUR CULT DADDY -

and here you sit with YOUR words defending the guy who lied to YOUR face.

Sorry - if it bothers YOU that I will not fall for the con man - or a ing word he says.

^^^ a great example of going full re !

[spurraider21]

Doesn't sound like it.

“In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that “the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference,” and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction…”

that's not really what that's saying though

the intent would certainly be a lot clearer if he actually WAS implicated in the underlying crime. it would speak to the motive. it still leaves the door open for somebody to try to bury an otherwise lawful investigation because it might be hurting him politically. its not as strong a motive, but still one nonetheless.

but nothing in that statement says that there isn't any non-public evidence of potential obstruction. they rightfully note that his lack of involvement in the underlying crime is a consideration for intent/motive

[boutons_deux]

Why have Trash and his mafiya been "forgetting", lying, obstructing, connecting with Russians for 2+ years?

[CitizenDwayne]

^^^ a great example of going full re !

I agree, he’s almost as incomprehensible as you

[Spurs Homer]

No, I believe your ex-GOD Mueller.

Mueller has said exactly -

ZERO

Barr has written his "summary"

You think that the guy who covered up this;

https://www.salon.com/2019/03/26/cov...again_partner/

Was going to actually be honest - after he auditioned for the job by volunteering an 18 page memo saying that a president is "above the law?"

So - you have seen ZERO from Mueller - yet -
here you are attacking someone who only wants to read 100% of the Mueller report.

Not the Barr report.
Not Barr's opinion.
Not Barrs cover up.
Not criminal Trumps bull con.

[koriwhat]

I agree, he’s almost as incomprehensible as you

i never go full re just 1/2.

[koriwhat]

Mueller has said exactly -

ZERO

Barr has written his "summary"

You think that the guy who covered up this;

https://www.salon.com/2019/03/26/cov...again_partner/

Was going to actually be honest - after he auditioned for the job by volunteering an 18 page memo saying that a president is "above the law?"

So - you have seen ZERO from Mueller - yet -
here you are attacking someone who only wants to read 100% of the Mueller report.

Not the Barr report.
Not Barr's opinion.
Not Barrs cover up.
Not criminal Trumps bull con.

sorry but the government doesn't bend because you say so... weren't you in the government at one point?

[Spurs Homer]

that's not really what that's saying though

the intent would certainly be a lot clearer if he actually WAS implicated in the underlying crime. it would speak to the motive. it still leaves the door open for somebody to try to bury an otherwise lawful investigation because it might be hurting him politically. its not as strong a motive, but still one nonetheless.

but nothing in that statement says that there isn't any non-public evidence of potential obstruction. they rightfully note that his lack of involvement in the underlying crime is a consideration for intent/motive

add to that -

that the ing LAW does not state you NEED an underlying crime.

Ask Flynn

Ask Martha Stewart

who were both found guilty - with no underlying crime.

It is plain to see a ing criminal cover up.

[Spurs Homer]

sorry but the government doesn't bend because you say so... weren't you in the government at one point?

I had "bone spurs"

[koriwhat]

I had "bone spurs"

idgaf about your lame jokes... you said, if i am not mistaken, that you're a vet yet you think the government should bend for you.

[Spurs Homer]

idgaf about your lame jokes... you said, if i am not mistaken, that you're a vet yet you think the government should bend for you.

I had "calf tats"

[TSA]

that's not really what that's saying though

the intent would certainly be a lot clearer if he actually WAS implicated in the underlying crime. it would speak to the motive. it still leaves the door open for somebody to try to bury an otherwise lawful investigation because it might be hurting him politically. its not as strong a motive, but still one nonetheless.

but nothing in that statement says that there isn't any non-public evidence of potential obstruction. they rightfully note that his lack of involvement in the underlying crime is a consideration for intent/motive

Trump could have shut down the investigation at any time. He didn’t.

[boutons_deux]

Why did none of Trash and his mafiya report the Russian corruption approaches to FBI?

Because they were told by the Russians that Russia planned to hurt Hillary, and help Trash?

House Dems know all of this and don't need Mueller's Boy Scout-ish VERY HIGH BAR to impeach Trash.

[TSA]

Mueller has said exactly -

ZERO

Barr has written his "summary"

You think that the guy who covered up this;

https://www.salon.com/2019/03/26/cov...again_partner/

Was going to actually be honest - after he auditioned for the job by volunteering an 18 page memo saying that a president is "above the law?"

So - you have seen ZERO from Mueller - yet -
here you are attacking someone who only wants to read 100% of the Mueller report.

Not the Barr report.
Not Barr's opinion.
Not Barrs cover up.
Not criminal Trumps bull con.

Stomping on Mueller’s grave. Sad.

[TSA]

Why did none of Trash and his mafiya report the Russian corruption approaches to FBI?

Because they were told by the Russians that Russia planned to hurt Hillary, and help Trash?

House Dems know all of this and don't need Mueller's Boy Scout-ish VERY HIGH BAR to impeach Trash.

Which Russian approaches are you referring to? The ones set up by the FBI informants or Fusion GOS?

[koriwhat]

I had "calf tats"

who's crying? i only see a ing dip who goes by Spurs Homer trying to joke his way out of a conversation because he's too dense to speak up. your jokes are as lame as you are and as dumb i might add.

do you mr. AWOL!

[koriwhat]

Which Russian approaches are you referring to? The ones set up by the FBI informants or Fusion GOS?

it's as if these re s think we're as dumb as they are and forget the facts that they conveniently dismiss. the cuck!

[Spurs Homer]

Trump could have shut down the investigation at any time. He didn’t.

You don't ing know that.
Barr could have shut down the investigation.

He probably curtailed it in some way.

Trump sure as tried - and you saw and heard it with your own eyes and ears - but you believe that he is "exonerated" because BARR decided it?

You heard and saw Trump obstructing.
You heard and saw Trump colluding and conspiring.

You refused to believe your own eyes and ears.

Those are plain facts.