drip drip drip
Barr actually thinks the Unitary President is beyond the reach of the law.
Legitimately surprised he said coordinated and not colluded
“knowingly spreading false information”
He’s literally ting himself right now
TSA's getting all worked up again.
"literally"
Prominent Democratic lawyer Greg Craig close to being charged in case stemming from Mueller probe
(CNN) Federal prosecutors are close to bringing charges against Greg Craig, a prominent Democratic lawyer and former White House counsel in the Obama administration, in a case that originated with special counsel Robert Mueller, according to people familiar with the matter.
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/03/28/pol....google.com%2F
fify
gop projecting
EXACTLY
the crimes they commit onto anyone who exposes corruption
lolololol
Greg Craig? That's a new one.
Lying under oath...tisk tisk Nellie.
post election collusion BOOM
I can smell the Schitt from here.
it would go towards intent/motive. cozying up with russia after conpsiring with them to help get elected. it would be consistent, in theory
Mueller all over that theory. Why are you still bringing up debunked hypotheticals?
i said "in theory"
we haven't read a word of mueller's report yet. just reign it in a bit, especially for somebody continuing to brink up the debunked hillary email conspiracy theory
I don't see why Schiff would have the resign over expressing his opinion about the prez, tbh...
It's not like the Dems asked the GOP to resign once the House concluded Shillary committed no crimes, despite the outright animosity displayed towards her...
I can see this having more traction if the GOP didn't lose the House in the midterms, but now in the minority?
You read Mueller’s exact words on Russian collusion. It didn’t happen.
If you want to deflect to Hillary be my guest and bump the appropriate thread, not sure how you claim that is debunked when it’s still being investigated.
Schiff wasn’t expressing his opinion, he was knowingly peddling false information.
now you're playing forum cop after two years?
Except he didn't cite any sources, the letter says that clearly on the very first paragraph.
And even if he did have access to some information, as long as he didn't break any confidentiality rules, it's still protected speech.
Heck, the POTUS lies incessantly (and far from being the first one), and picks and chooses the MSM media he talks to, should he resign too? What's the bar here?
Sure, I would rather take the non-lying, honest politician, they just don't seem to exist.
If Schiff wasn’t knowingly spreading false information than he should have nothing to fear from an investigation. That’s how it works right?
Absolutely. I was arguing about the rationale for him resigning.
Plus, the House GOP is well versed in trying to score political points with worthless investigations. Let them go at it.
I predict Schiff will resign or be indicted.
what would he be indicted for?
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)