Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Pavlov]

I predict Schiff will resign or be indicted.

File that with your Hillary, Rice and martial law/mass Dem arrests predictions.

[TSA]

what would he be indicted for?

Leaking classified information to the press.

[TSA]

The outcome is no surprise to those who scrutinized the facts as they emerged. Time and again, the available evidence undermined the case for such a conspiracy. None of the characters presented to us as Russian “agents” or Trump-Kremlin “intermediaries” were shown to be anything of the sort. None of the lies that Trump aides or allies were caught telling pointed us toward the collusion that members of the media and political figures insisted they were hiding. None of the various pillars of Russiagate—the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting; the fanciful assertions of the Steele dossier; the anonymously sourced media claims, such as Trump campaign members’ having “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials”—ever led us to damning evidence. And all of that is likely why Mueller never charged anyone with involvement in (or covering up) a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

A minimally responsible media and political class would have acknowledged this reality. Instead, leading voices from cable news, Congress, and other influential perches promoted Russiagate by ignoring the countervailing evidence and those who pointed it out. They filled in the evidentiary holes with supposition, innuendo, and outright falsehood. That helps to explain the sizable number of discredited or retracted media reports that advanced the notion of a Trump-Russia plot, culminating in the final collapse of that narrative.

[TSA]

The outcome is no surprise to those who scrutinized the facts as they emerged. Time and again, the available evidence undermined the case for such a conspiracy. None of the characters presented to us as Russian “agents” or Trump-Kremlin “intermediaries” were shown to be anything of the sort. None of the lies that Trump aides or allies were caught telling pointed us toward the collusion that members of the media and political figures insisted they were hiding. None of the various pillars of Russiagate—the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting; the fanciful assertions of the Steele dossier; the anonymously sourced media claims, such as Trump campaign members’ having “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials”—ever led us to damning evidence. And all of that is likely why Mueller never charged anyone with involvement in (or covering up) a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

A minimally responsible media and political class would have acknowledged this reality. Instead, leading voices from cable news, Congress, and other influential perches promoted Russiagate by ignoring the countervailing evidence and those who pointed it out. They filled in the evidentiary holes with supposition, innuendo, and outright falsehood. That helps to explain the sizable number of discredited or retracted media reports that advanced the notion of a Trump-Russia plot, culminating in the final collapse of that narrative.

RIP djohn2oo8

[spurraider21]

yes, lol cable news and pundits. and twitter experts.

stick to print news from the big boys and you can avoid a lot of hysteria.

[Spurs Homer]

Leaking classified information to the press.

bring it
investigate him

release everything

when the smoke clears
only the traitors will be exposed

every ing thing that shiff said to warn the country about trumps ery
was based on already known public info

in other words

everything that anyone could see with their own eyes

unless you are a blind cultist

[koriwhat]

bring it
investigate him

release everything

when the smoke clears
only the traitors will be exposed

every ing thing that shiff said to warn the country about trumps ery
was based on already known public info

in other words

everything that anyone could see with their own eyes

unless you are a blind cultist

closed door sessions leaked... yeah that info was just public!

every day you make a case for your lack of brains.

[Spurs Homer]

The outcome is no surprise to those who scrutinized the facts as they emerged. Time and again, the available evidence undermined the case for such a conspiracy. None of the characters presented to us as Russian “agents” or Trump-Kremlin “intermediaries” were shown to be anything of the sort. None of the lies that Trump aides or allies were caught telling pointed us toward the collusion that members of the media and political figures insisted they were hiding. None of the various pillars of Russiagate—the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting; the fanciful assertions of the Steele dossier; the anonymously sourced media claims, such as Trump campaign members’ having “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials”—ever led us to damning evidence. And all of that is likely why Mueller never charged anyone with involvement in (or covering up) a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

A minimally responsible media and political class would have acknowledged this reality. Instead, leading voices from cable news, Congress, and other influential perches promoted Russiagate by ignoring the countervailing evidence and those who pointed it out. They filled in the evidentiary holes with supposition, innuendo, and outright falsehood. That helps to explain the sizable number of discredited or retracted media reports that advanced the notion of a Trump-Russia plot, culminating in the final collapse of that narrative.

Great.

So release the Mueller report - all 100% of it.

classified, grand jury, fisa, executive privilege - since it didn't matter when it was a HRC investigation =

RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -

or all that garbage is meaningless.

Except -

The right is doing everything possible to BURY IT.

Why?

[Spurs Homer]

closed door sessions leaked... yeah that info was just public!

every day you make a case for your lack of brains.

Post every thing that he leaked that was improper?

Go ahead.

I'll shoot down all your "theories"

[koriwhat]

Post every thing that he leaked that was improper?

Go ahead.

I'll shoot down all your "theories"

they aren't theories and that's what you're missing besides your brain of course.

[TSA]

every ing thing that shiff said to warn the country about trumps ery
was based on already known public info

this is too easy

[TSA]

Great.

So release the Mueller report - all 100% of it.

classified, grand jury, fisa, executive privilege - since it didn't matter when it was a HRC investigation =

RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -

or all that garbage is meaningless.

Except -

The right is doing everything possible to BURY IT.

Why?

again too ing easy

[Spurs Homer]

again too ing easy

So Schiff never gave out any "classified" info

Ok thanks

too easy

(unless your videos were supposed to say something different?)

idiot - shooting himself on the vagina

[TSA]

So Schiff never gave out any "classified" info

Ok thanks

too easy

(unless your videos were supposed to say something different?)

idiot - shooting himself on the vagina

Shook Homer doesn’t even realize what this about even though his words were quoted.

[Spurs Homer]

why are they going to bury the "grand jury" stuff?

None of that has to be buried

Mueller could redact his "methods and sources" and still release the interviews -

except those interviews would be full of evidence of trumps crimes - its called "corroboration"

so why bury that?

No sir buddy


100% of this will NEVER be over - trump will be investigated until 100% is released.

[TSA]

RELEASE THE MUELLER REPORT -

TRUMP: OK

[Spurs Homer]

Shook Homer doesn’t even realize what this about even though his words were quoted.

Idiot

You said Schiff released "classified info" and then your video shows schiff refusing to divulge classified info

so you made my point for me

thanks for being a in treasonous idiot

[TSA]

why are they going to bury the "grand jury" stuff?

None of that has to be buried

Mueller could redact his "methods and sources" and still release the interviews -

except those interviews would be full of evidence of trumps crimes - its called "corroboration"

so why bury that?

No sir buddy


100% of this will NEVER be over - trump will be investigated until 100% is released.

Bill Clinton was compromised by Russia

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pre...ounsel-reports

[TSA]

Idiot

You said Schiff released "classified info" and then your video shows schiff refusing to divulge classified info

so you made my point for me

thanks for being a in treasonous idiot

You’re so shook you don’t even know what post of mine you’re responding to

[TSA]

TRUMP: OK

[Spurs Homer]

TRUMP: OK

Idiot.

Just like trump said

"i want to testify before mueller"

and then pussied out behind closed doors

this is no different

if the fraud president says "ok" and then calls barr and says "don't you ing dare release it"

then barr will continue to around

if Trump really meant it


it would be released today - but he is scared less that his criminal cover up is going to slowly be exposed


Tonight - he will tell his re ed cult zombies: "im 100% exonerated" and "mueller report exonerated me"

Tomorrow : "it's up to the AG - I don't care" and "barr - you better not dare expose me"

[DMC]

So Schiff never gave out any "classified" info

Ok thanks

too easy

(unless your videos were supposed to say something different?)

idiot - shooting himself on the vagina

You think that's Schiff?

[DMC]

Idiot.

Just like trump said

"i want to testify before mueller"

and then pussied out behind closed doors

this is no different

if the fraud president says "ok" and then calls barr and says "don't you ing dare release it"

then barr will continue to around

if Trump really meant it


it would be released today - but he is scared less that his criminal cover up is going to slowly be exposed


Tonight - he will tell his re ed cult zombies: "im 100% exonerated" and "mueller report exonerated me"

Tomorrow : "it's up to the AG - I don't care" and "barr - you better not dare expose me"

Did you ever get that lime green Prius?

[Spurs Homer]

You think that's Schiff?

he was referring to post #46095

[TSA]

he was referring to post #46095

No, it was referring to post #46092, yours, the post I quoted, but you were too ing shook and spazzing to see that.