Reply With Quote
It’s official. No one is this ing re ed. You’re an amazing Russiagate pusher troll. PM me who your main account is.
I want to buy you a beer if we are ever in the same city.
i cant comment on what they "ever" did because i do not claim to have read every single article posted by each of these publications over the course of the last 2 years.
i didnt have that impression, though. there was probably some misreporting and corrections made. i believe wapo famously had a story about the electric grid being compromised that they corrected, for instance.
It’s official. No one is this ing re ed. You’re an amazing Russiagate pusher troll. PM me who your main account is.
I want to buy you a beer if we are ever in the same city.
You must have had very selective readings. WaPo and NYT were instrumental in pushing it to the peaks of hysteria.
well, if you think everybody who reported on the investigation was also pushing it to the peaks of hysteria, then i mean yeah i guess. it's not how i'd characterize it.
I didn’t characterize it as “everybody who reported on the investigation” chumpdumperlite.
if not, then i'm not sure how you reached the conclusion that they were instrumental in pushing it to the peaks of hysteria, pizzaboy
Nice *ding chumpdumperlite
Are the WaPo and NYT everybody?
if you're gonna namecall then you deserve it thrown back at you, pizzaboy
of course not. i identified a bunch of other sources. despite your statements to the contrary, you're still clearly operating under the assumption that reporting the investigation = peddling a hoax
I was very clear in saying the WaPo and NYT were instrumental in pushing it to the peaks of hysteria, you immediately created a false narrative that I thought “everybody who reported on the investigation was also pushing it to the peaks of hysteria”. That was chumperdumper levels of deception. You earned it cdlite.
ok? i never said you said that outright. that's what you're hung up on, papa john?
unless you adopt the notion that anybody who reported on the investigation at length must also have been "pushing it to the peaks of hysteria", then i think its a reach to suggest nyt/wapo did.
One week into the mueller report
cover up
release the full ing report
ing traitors
This is how Philo works. He doesn't quote you, he paraphrases and then cries "semantics" if you call him out on it.
Settle down, you petty little name caller.
MUELLER’S GHOST IS STILL HAUNTING TRUMPWORLD
The fallout from the Russia probe is hardly over. For some, the legal nightmare has only just begun.
. The latest, per CNN, is Greg Craig, a Democratic lawyer and former Obama White House counsel who is reportedly expected to be charged by federal prosecutors for making false statements about his lobbying work in Ukraine alongside Paul Manafort.
the Craig news suggests: the fallout from Mueller’s two-year investigation is hardly over.
the special grand jury that was impaneled to investigate Russian collusion in the 2016 election is still active and “continuing robustly,”
“That word strongly suggests that
the handoffs from Robert Mueller’s office are alive and kicking and
that the Washington U.S. Attorney’s Office could be another troubling front for the president and the White House.”
Goodhand’s case, ... is just one of numerous cases dispensed to other jurisdictions.
The Southern District of New York, for instance, has received at least three referrals for cases of illicit foreign lobbying,
focusing on both Republican and Democratic actors, including super-lobbyist Tony Podesta.
(The Craig case was referred to D.C. investigators after S.D.N.Y. prosecutors determined they did not have enough evidence to file charges.)
Mueller’s referral of the Michael Cohen case to S.D.N.Y. led to a multiple additional investigations,
including one into whether the Trump inaugural committee accepted money from a foreign government.
Mueller also referred cases to the D.C. Attorney’s office, such as the investigation into Trump adviser Rick Gates.
And numerous cases digging into
Trump’s business,
tax practices, and
charities
have mushroomed in jurisdictions across the country.
When it was convened, the special counsel’s office was tasked ... as well as “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation,”
(“I think that’s a violation,” Trump said, of Mueller potentially probing his family businesses.)
With Mueller’s portion of the probe concluded, Americans may discover just how broad it became.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03/mueller-probe-additional-indictments?mbid=nl_th_5c9d495e1c3519239055dadf&CN DID=43758549&utm_source=nl&utm_brand=vf&utm_mailin g=VF_Hive_032919&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c 17c1048022fcc&user_id=43758549&hasha=992d608214b50 5003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3cc f3faae18526a77bd&hashc=54b3612ab970ce13a64a16665b1 987080ca5b72e2ee762b722fbba6ab378f2f5&esrc=bounceX &utm_campaign=VF_Hive_032919&utm_term=VYF_Hive
Last edited by boutons_deux; 03-29-2019 at 11:30 AM.
“The Rachel Maddow Show” saw an average 13 percent decrease in viewership comparing her ratings Monday through Wednesday this week versus last week — Maddow lost nearly a whopping 500,000 viewers on Monday’s show following the release of Barr’s letter compared to her previous Monday show. She also saw a 15 percent decrease in the 25-52 demo audience.
More than half of Americans believe Mueller probe was fair, are satisfied with results: Poll
That illustrates that her viewers are looking for the same thing she is. They'll tune in again when another false narrative is introduced.
Damn dog, that's your MO.
The other half are conspiri s that are upset they're wet dreams didn't come true, huh?
do you believe Mueller probe was fair?
Example?
I wouldn't dream of proving you a hypocrite, you do it so well youself.
So half of Americans who have never read a word of the Mueller report think it is fair.
Ok thanks!
Their problem isn’t with the probe itself; it’s with Barr’s summary, and the report itself being unreleased
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
