Reply With Quote
So you're not reading this?
None of us read your slap fights. Why not battle each other through PMs?
So you're not reading this?
When I see you and him going at it, I just scroll
But, by all means, carry on
But you read this, right?
gots doing got things per par.
Ooops!
In fairness, this happens pretty often on Fox.
“Fox & Friends” Blames Obama for Creating Additional Mexicos
NEW YORK —After praising Donald J. Trump, on Sunday, for cutting aid to “three Mexican countries,” the cast of “Fox & Friends” blamed former President Barack Obama for creating additional Mexicos during his tenure in the White House.
“When Barack Obama took office, there was only one Mexico,” the host Ed Henry said.
“He allowed these additional Mexicos to develop.”
Henry’s co-host Jedediah Bila agreed that the problem of multiple Mexicos was Obama’s fault.
“It was bad enough having one Mexico without Obama going out and creating a bunch of new ones,”
she said, noting that there
had been a three-hundred-per-cent increase in the number of Mexicos on Obama’s watch.
The third host, Pete Hegseth, praised
Trump for doing everything in his power to “reduce the number of Obama’s Mexicos.”
“Everyone agrees that there are way too many Mexicos right now,” he said.
Later in the day, the White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said that, after watching “Fox & Friends,”
President Trump was committed to finding out “just how many Mexicos there are,” and that
he had put the Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, in charge of counting them.
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/fox-and-friends-blames-obama-for-creating-additional-mexicos
Succession-style battle for Fox News
Murdoch family holds its breath as future of media empire hangs in the balance | CNN BusinessThe fate of Rupert Murdoch’s vast media empire, including Fox News, is now in the hands of a Reno probate commissioner, who will decide whether the 93-year-old media mogul can change his succession plan to preserve the right-wing editorial bent of his influential outlets.
Murdoch and his eldest children descended on a Reno courthouse to appear for evidentiary hearings in a secret trial to determine whether the 93-year-old can alter the family trust that he established decades ago, giving his four oldest children equal votes over the future of his conservative media empire after he dies. Murdoch wants to amend the trust so that his eldest son and chosen successor, Lachlan, will remain in charge for decades to come.
But the three other Murdoch children — James, Elisabeth and Prudence — oppose the change, and have challenged it in court. According to The New York Times and Wall Street Journal, Murdoch fears his other three children could moderate the highly profitable and famously right-wing slant promoted by some of his outlets like Fox News, which he believes would diminish the company’s value.
He's right. If Fox News were to give up the right wing slant, they would definitely lose viewership
CNN would be right there to pivot to the right.
IIRC, all the major TV news outlets are currently owned by asshole right wingers.
Radio too. The blowtorch icon station here WOAI that has the Spurs games is that way. Started in the 90s
will be appealed, of course
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...mpire-childrenRupert Murdoch’s three adult children will retain control over their father’s media empire upon his death, a Nevada court has ruled after Murdoch launched a campaign to wrest away their power and give it all to his oldest son.
The New York Times reported on Murdoch’s loss, citing a sealed court decision that was filed on Saturday. The family battle happened outside of the public’s eye, despite attempts from the media to gain access to the trial.
Murdoch took three of his adult children, James, Elisabeth and Prudence, to court as he tried to completely remove their voting power over the trust Murdoch set up. Murdoch wanted to give Lachlan, his oldest son and most likeminded child, complete control over the media companies.
After reviewing the case, the Nevada commissioner Edmund Gorman concluded that Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch had acted in “bad faith” in their attempts to change the terms of an irrevocable trust that divides control of the company between Murdoch’s four oldest children.
derp still lurking
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
