SAYS YOU LAWYER BOY
none of that explains why you busted out dictionary definitions if your intent the whole time was just "whatever chris meant"
you yourself and had to backtrack
Not at all, but I think it's cute you don't even know what it is I do babycakes.
Says the guy who wants to play words with friends and avoids substantive discussion like the plague.
So words don't matter?
Dictionary bad now?
"I'm just here to"
You're here 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Who are you kidding?
LAWYER BY
Now the dictionary is bad, using words is bad and Pavlov has reasons for being here.
All this happened in the past couple of days.
Reason for being ITT, sorry you're too flustered to figure that out. Tough couple of days for you, tough guy.
BTW your dictionary definition on you. So dictionary bad now?
You kept chirping hoping someone would ask you to dance, you sittin' up in your room waiting for the meals on wheels.
no. I've been mocking you ever since I predicted exactly what you were going to do.
You're even more pissy and defensive than I thought you would be. Props.![]()
no, dictionary isn't "bad." in fact, in confirmed my position as to what a "law" is and contradicted your own position to the point you had to argue that "community" must refer to a "city, state, or jurisdiction" with no basis to make such claim
your use of the dictionary also contradicts the notion that all along you were only referring to "what chris meant"
No Philo, you cherry picked one word, then took an alternate definition of that word to try to show that any group of people with similar interests cons utes a community, therefore any set of rules used by any group of people cons utes laws, so obviously that's what Chris meant when he stated his fear that Sharia Law would begin to exist in the US if white nationalism was exiled.
Is it a prerequisite to not be a straight shooter, if you want to be a lawyer? Did you study rules of small groups and religious organizations to become a lawyer? Since you needed to confirm the definition of "law" I mean.
Not like you're going to actually participate in a discussion though, you're a sniper.
This is the Cliff's Notes version of DMC's three-day "discussions" rodeo.
It really would have been easy for you to just do that.
Instead....
![]()
If Qhris is scared his mom is going to be executed for adultery, then he's an idiot for reasons already stated by everyone.
Not much else to say.
it said rules of a particular "country or community"
that one word (community) accounts for quite a bit of the meaning. that's not cherry-picking. i dont see how that's an "alternate definition." its the very definition you provided. you're the one who made the absurd claim that "community" is referring specifically to a state, city, or jurisdiction.
why dont you go ahead and post the definition of community from that same source.
Of course it said that. It didn't say "of a particular society or community"
Federal, state, local. Community represents local. It doesn't indicate religious groups or any other gathering of like minded people, not in that definition.
Consider the following:
Why do communities need laws?
Laws protect our general safety, and ensure our rights as citizens against abuses by other people, by organizations, and by the government itself. We have laws to help provide for our general safety. These exist at the local, state and national levels, and include things like: Laws about food safety.
Consider Wiki definition:
Law is a system of rules that are created and enforced through social or governmental ins utions to regulate behavior.[2] It has been defined both as "the Science of Justice" and "the Art of Justice".[3][4] Law is a system that regulates and ensures that individuals or a community adhere to the will of the state. State-enforced laws can be made by a collective legislature or by a single legislator, resulting in statutes, by the executive through decrees and regulations, or established by judges through precedent, normally in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals can create legally binding contracts, including arbitration agreements that may elect to accept alternative arbitration to the normal court process. The formation of laws themselves may be influenced by a cons ution, written or tacit, and the rights encoded therein. The law shapes politics, economics, history and society in various ways and serves as a mediator of relations between people.
Obviously I recognized that there are other definitions for the word "law" otherwise I wouldn't have asked for the definition in use at the time, since it was obvious what definition Chris was using, and trying to contradict his statement by using a different definition of the word "law" was moving the goalposts.
Now I expect a couple word response and some memes.
so you didnt like the definition that you yourself provided and are now moving on to a different source for a more favorable definition. talk about ting yourself. you're now deciding what you think community means based on what is convenient for your argument, not what it is actually defined as.
again, i urge you to post the definition of community from the same source where you got the definition of law
of course, this all makes no sense if all along all you cared about is what chris meant by law
The definition was fine. I was showing you that the term "community" has usage where law is defined that doesn't necessarily mean what you claimed it meant. I wasn't redefining law. I don't know what's hard to understand about that unless you're being intentionally naive.
It won't make sense to someone who doesn't care for the entire conversation, and only pops into try to score points now and then.again, i urge you to post the definition of community from the same source where you got the definition of law
of course, this all makes no sense if all along all you cared about is what chris meant by law
I didn't expect you to consider anything I posted, because you're dead set on getting your forum credits from pointing out your daily contradictions even if you have to make something up.
Makes more sense for Winetroll to admit he was wrong and call it a day. : )
now there's no true Scotsman
he and i were pretty clear all along that we didnt find it realistic or possible for sharia law to ever become a law of the US or any state. we just noted that sharia or sharia law (there is no distinction) is already observed by many muslims here.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)