L’Daijohnique? Really?
Uh, No. They already exist and aren't created by a headline. What you bring up can certainly exacerbate situations at times, but to act like that is a main catalyst is complete and utter horse . Plainly put, polarity and racism exist, because of extremists and racists, not because of media headlines.
It was a big dude, who threw some genuinely nasty hits on a womans head. race is sort of beside the point in that particular context.
that said, the guy is a nasty racist which probably added to his willingness to do such a thing.
Fox News audience. Not really a surprise.
Dude is a coward
racial division is caused by criticizing the police, not by racist cops.
Who said anything about a main catalyst? Way to go off on a tangent there bud.
No, we should say Dallas woman beaten by a man with a gun.Yeah, we should say “white” and “alternative race” instead
See how that works simple mono?
Skin color is irrelevant. You're being obtuse, and trolling hard.
Duly noted.
I'm right here. You tapped out after this:
I don't blame you.
Seriously though, I don't blame you for tapping out. Your argument had no legs.
You said using words like white and black CREATE polarity and racism and it doesn't. Racism exists because of racists, not pot stirring headlines. There is a difference between creating the problem and exacerbating it.
whatever
Boy you sure told me.
he's a ing re who just a few days ago thought i couldn't separate russian collusion with trump which didn't exist vs. russian interference in our elections which i also brought up china, aus, uk, etc but i'm the dumb one... dumbasses will always be that and assume because they're re s.Boy you sure told me.
I'm glad you see it this way, tbh. We'll remember this journalistic philosophy next time you post about an immigrant committing some kind of crime.
Yeah because journalists refer to illegal immigrants as brown. Good callI'm glad you see it this way, tbh. We'll remember this journalistic philosophy next time you post about an immigrant committing some kind of crime.
Idiot.
so in a hypothetical cir stance with similar facts, instead of saying "dallas woman beaten by illegal immigrant man from honduras with a gun" the stories should just say "dallas woman beaten by man with a gun"Yeah because journalists refer to illegal immigrants as brown. Good call
Idiot.
see how that works?
Semantics good now
define semantics
No. Illegal immigrant would be a poignant fact in an honest article without race baiting. See how that works?
Doesn't matter. You're against polarizing headlines now. That's a good thing. We'll hold you to it.Yeah because journalists refer to illegal immigrants as brown. Good call
Idiot.
Proud of you, buddy.
Ah, damn, you reverted back to a polarizing fear monger.
Oh well. Guess it was never meant to last. Progressive at udes have short lifespans in small brains.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
