Reply With Quote
I can answer. I told you to ante up and you went into tizzy mode.
You're whining.But muh demands
If you can't answer, just say so.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
I can answer. I told you to ante up and you went into tizzy mode.
Then quit stalling and answer.
You're making up poker rules for a simple discussion.I told you to ante up and you went into tizzy mode.
It's not poker.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
I mean you could have Googled "federal reserve problems" and faked some by now.
But muh conditions.
lol derp
I didn't need to fake anything. You should stop being an asshole and presuming people don't know stuff just because it suits your psychopav narrative.
Great, then just answer.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
Ante up, .
Whether they up or not is immaterial to the fact that they're largely in control of monetary policy in the US. They're much quicker than Congress (who has the power of the purse), to react to inflation and deflation problems, and largely dictate where the money flows.Fed causes the problems.at giving them credit for tempering their ing stuff up.
Again, arguing whether they're good, bad, right or wrong is a very different topic. What can't be denied is the power they exert over the economy.
You're making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
It's not poker.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
Either answer or say you can't answer.
If they didn't manage it, what good would that be to them and their benefactors?
You had your chance. Throw your chip in next time, pussy.
You're making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
It's not poker.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
It's clear you know absolutely nothing about the Fed and are balled up in a fetal position.
Keep whining.
lol derp
That's a lot of crying for a guy who feigns to have a keen interest in the matter at hand. Par.
You're addressing the Fed, I'm addressing the economy at large. We're talking about two different topics. Can we at least agree that the Fed's decisions have a large impact on money flow, cost of debt and thus, the economy?
Past that, and addressing your point, I don't dwell on the Fed because I can't do anything about the Fed. It's there, they make decisions that impact millions of Americans, including me, but we don't vote for them, or pick them. I don't even know what's the barometer to measure their work? Monetary policy over the past 50 years? 100 years? 10 years?
I do have an interest in your claim the fed causes problems.
That's why I asked you a simple question.
How does the Fed cause problems as you claim?
Please explain in your own words without whining or trying to change the subject or making up poker rules for a simple discussion.
Your level of "interest" doesn't rise to anteing up. Throw your chip next time, pussy.
Nor do I dwell on the fed. That's sort of my point. They're an x-factor that any president has to deal with. They have the power to excite the economy or dampen it at any time. That's why I was saying it's silly to be throwing them credit.
Pavlov
Gonna throw you a bone, .
The Fed's an un-elected private en y that is designed to enrich itself and its benefactors to the detriment of American citizenry.
1. Stop presuming people don't know and crying about it.
2. Throw your chip in next time.
"ante up"
You haven't even said what problems the fed causes.
That's what I asked.
Answer the simple question next time, pussy.
I can only assume you lost money gambling recently.
I gave them credit for exactly what you're crediting them with: they largely have much more to do with the economy overall than either Congress or the Executive (save very specific instances, like the bailout). We basically agree on that.
It's pretty sad to see people in here hoping for a recession just to further their political views. Recessions hurt everyone.
bull , as usual
Banksters Great Depression proved that BigFinance is almost totally immune to being "hurt", will be bailed out yet again, come out stronger, more (politically) dominant, more controlling, while "everyone" ELSE gets screwed for years, or life.
Capitalism is unstable, aka "business cycle", and lots of indicators say a recession is coming. eg, watch the imminent IMF and World bank meetings
and like in 2007, Capitalists will have made the next recession much worse having corroded banking regulations created after the Banksters Great Depression,
esp by selling, yet again, being allowed to see many $100Bs of "subprime" loans (closing fees, plus high interest income for Capitalists) to shaky, dicey orgs that will fold and default when the next recession hits.
Then the vulture/hyena/predatory Capitalists will sweep to "asset strip" the company carasses.
And this will happen without any "everyone" wishing one way or the other.
As always, rightwingnutjobs have been suckered into duped, conned into NOT knowing the actual perps.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-08-2019 at 09:42 AM.
So Boo hoping for a recession.
Sick mother er.
lol "hoping"
Economic cycles are a thing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions