Reply With Quote
lakers... gots
It’s Showtime
Oh, his name ain't D'Bust no mo?
I guess we didn’t realize just how bad Lakers player development is tbhOh, his name ain't D'Bust no mo?
nope, y'all got LeBust nowOh, his name ain't D'Bust no mo?
nope, y'all got LeBust now
Big Facts
He's easily the best player the Lakers have drafted in years.
this.Oh, his name ain't D'Bust no mo?
all this does is show how ty our development of young guys is ...
and how even more ty Spur fan is at recognizing talent ...
Yall some rob pelinka/ magic type cats overrating scrubs and ignoring talent
I was a loud Dangelo supporter his success doesnt bother me AT ALL ...
Rather I be right, I know hoops ...
Last edited by Killakobe81; 04-08-2019 at 08:59 AM.
IF ingram stas healthy he will be nice too
And though randle has flaws he was a good player too
Lonzo is TBD, even though Tatum is overrated now I Was still on "TEAM draft Tatum over Lonzo" ...
We still a show, regardless
Last edited by Killakobe81; 04-08-2019 at 08:58 AM.
I don't really see what Lonzo is good at tbh. I never understood the hype. He isn't fast so he can't get to the rim at will (like Foxx). He can't shoot midrange and can't post up so him being 6 foot 7 is completely useless. He can't shoot 3s or free throws either. He's not even that good of a passer. What skill was suppose to translate to the NBA level?
Getting rid of DBust was dumb since that meant you had to replace him with Lonzo.
tatum hasnt done to say his better then ball
as for ball? he needs to be more aggressive on offense chasing his own points instead of playing the conservative game to please lebron or whoever
Randle didn't really start looking good until the NOP. Ingram's problem is the same, he's on a crap franchise that can't develop young players.
what talent are you talking about specifically?
They got rid of him because:
a) they had to get rid of mozgov
b) they would have to pay him a premium on the next contract or 10M at the very least
c) he was (self admitted) not a good leader
d) he was a horrid defender
They didn't have to grab ball tbh, fox and mitc were in hindsight far better options.
Every big plays lights out in that system for some reason, but randle has developed pretty well tbh. Still hasn't done anything meaningful, but better than nothing.
You could say that the lakers can develop young players well, they just give up on them too fast because ... well.. lakers don't build through the draft, because lakers.
i rather have given up Ingram to get rid of Mozgov. I've never seen so much hype for a kid that doesn't put in the work. He still can't shoot the 3. He still can't play defense and he hasn't even gotten stronger. You could've drafted Tatum to replace him. The Lakers don't have a leader now so getting rid of him bc of leadership doesn't even make sense. He is worth 10 million a year and I don't think they would've had to pay him the max anyways. Who was going to bid on him? And his defense can be schemed to improve since he is a PG.
First step is they need to get rid of the raging #23 that thinks he's as good as Kobe or Jordan but he never was.
I followed Brooklyn a lot this season and was hoping they'd make the playoffs, but let's be honest: D'Angelo "led" them to a record of 41-40 in the East, and he's ranked 19th among PGs in RPM, two slots behind Derrick White. It's a good story for Brooklyn, but it's not like D'Angelo is setting the league on fire, or is suddenly worthy of a max contract.
Last edited by R. DeMurre; 04-08-2019 at 01:31 PM.
That's literally the meaning of not being able to develop players.
Playoff wins in last six years:
D'tective - 1
Lkers -
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
