Harden hasn't dominated . Get back to us when he accomplishes anything of significance.
Are you ing blind? Harden has been on point this year, injuries, dropping 50 and 60 points like it's nothing. But hey you can't please everybody, especially a Raptors fan...![]()
Harden hasn't dominated . Get back to us when he accomplishes anything of significance.
Harden is a scam artist like Westbrook that gets no love until he proves it in the postseason. Doesn't matter if I support the Warriors, Raptors or Knicks.![]()
Don't be so dense.
1) he literally was concussed from an elbow to the head, and it didn't change him one bit. Artests shot wasnt nothing at all.
2) plenty of superstars in history have been elbowed in the face, clotheslined, thrown down, teeth knocked out, etc... and it never changed any of them. so why would harden somehow be more affected by it? there is literally no basis for that argument whatsoever, and i honestly have never understood why people bother making it and don't listen to how stupid the logic actually is
It would change Harden because he's a pussy.
proof?
yeah. people in the 80's barely defended the 3 point line... imagine them trying to defend crossover step back 3's... even guys like reggie miller and ray allen barely did that stuff unless the clock called for it. harden does it all the time with decent efficiency.
Harden is a great regular season player who is also exceptional at manipulating the rules. Even without the whistles, he's almost unguardable. I used to hate his game, and I still don't really like it, but you can't deny the guy's greatness.
I feel the same way, although I still hate his game, can't deny that he's a top 10 player of all-time during the RS..
Still hasn't proven anything in the playoffs, though..even in their run to the WCFs last year, he wasn't particularly impressive..
Agreed. The whistles just add a frustration factor, but even if you take a few cheap fouls away each game, then instead of averaging 35, hes averaging 28-30. Still unguardable.
Harden wouldn't have developed that shot back then.
If you make that assumption it defeats the entire purpose of the exercise. Aren’t we basically asking if his game would have translated?
I don't think so. The comment was that he would have dominated then as well, but he wouldn't have because he wouldn't be allowed to chuck 30 3's a game and he wouldn't get the ticky tack fouls he gets now. Hand checking was allowed. He'd be nothing more than a World B Free type player.
His craftiness would have just manifested in a way that fits that era, but his success(RS, at least) would definitely translate.
Harden is averaging the same amount of FTAs as jordan in his 37 ppg year, and only 1 more than kobe in his 35 ppg year. He isn’t getting record amounts of Fts, he’s just getting buckets.
It’s crazy that him and KD were on the same team.
okc
He wouldn’t do it in that era because they didn’t play like that back then.
It’s not like he would find the time stone and time travel with his current skillset
There were less possessions back then. Harden would have gotten choked in the locker room by his teammates after his first game.
that makes this entire discussion of "would player x have succeeded in the y era" completely moot
i dunno about u guys, but it seems to me harden led team is better then a westbrook or kd led team...showing by the records since the trio breakup
That is not proof of anything.
him, KD, and westbrook would have easily been better than the heatles and warriors... I said it in 2012 this team is going to dominate the next generation and I would have been right if they hadn't been stupid
No it doesn't.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)