Has trump denounced Russia yet?
Day - 19? of the criminal cover up covering treason against the usa
The campaigns were briefed. You get approached by someone like that, you tell the FBI.
The question no Trump supporter ever wants asked and will never answer is why did nobody in the Trump campaign ever tell the FBI about any of these contacts with Russians?
Comey is confused (not a very good actor)
Why did Trash and his mafiya "forget", LIE, obstruct about for 2 years about their Russian connections?
Why were there so many Russians connections?
Why were Russians offers of illegal campaign ing not reported to FBI?
Why did Jared have to modify his declarations of his overseas connections, investments dozens of times? And still got top secret clearance?
(I bet JK using his access to top secret info, as insider business info, to build his and his partners' wealth)
What is so bad in the Mueller report and Trash's taxes that they must be kept secret, even from Congress?
Can anyone name a "Russian" that reached out to the Trump campaign that wasn't sent by the FBI, CIA, or Fusion GPS?
Ex-DNI: 'Stunning and scary' that Barr would raise spying allegation
Washington (CNN) Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said Wednesday it was "both stunning and scary" that Attorney General William Barr would tell lawmakers that Donald Trump's 2016 campaign was spied on.
"I thought it was both stunning and scary," Clapper, who served under President Barack Obama, told CNN's Anderson Cooper. "I was amazed at that and rather disappointed that the attorney general would say such a thing. The term 'spying' has all kinds of negative connotations and I have to believe he chose that term deliberately."
Barr told lawmakers Wednesday that he would look into the FBI's counterintelligence investigation that began in 2016 of potential ties between members of Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government.
"For the same reason we're worried about foreign influence in elections, I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal," Barr said. "I'm not suggesting those rules were violated but I think it's important to look at. ... I think it's my obligation."
A source familiar with Barr's thinking, however, said that he referred to "spying" in the "classic sense" of intelligence collection, not as "pejorative." The attorney general did not provide evidence of any spying.
Clapper slammed Barr for airing such concerns publicly. He said he would have preferred that Barr ask the Justice Department's inspector general for a briefing on an ongoing investigation into whether the FBI mishandled warrant applications under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
"It would have been far more appropriate for him to just defer to that investigation rather than postulating with apparently no evidence. He just has a feeling that there was spying against the campaign," Clapper added.
Clapper warned that instead of focusing on addressing the investigation's impetus of Russian election meddling, "we're focusing on this circus about whether or not somebody was spying on the campaign, which is, I think, a gross misstatement," he said.
Barr's bombs will likely be viewed as a welcome development to the President, who has regularly called for an investigation and, as recently as last week, told reporters more should be done to examine the origins of the Russia probe.
It will also likely raise concerns of politicization of the Department of Justice's work at an already tense time, as Democrats worry that Barr is bending to the President's demands and have called on Barr to release an unredacted version of the special counsel's confidential report on the Russia investigation to Congress.
Congressional Democrats fumed Wednesday over Barr's statements, accusing the attorney general of mischaracterizing the FBI's counterintelligence investigation in an effort to please Trump.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/04/10/p...mpression=true
Clapper nervous as
Several questions pending you will never answer.
So is ComeyEx-DNI: 'Stunning and scary' that Barr would raise spying allegation
Washington (CNN) Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said Wednesday it was "both stunning and scary" that Attorney General William Barr would tell lawmakers that Donald Trump's 2016 campaign was spied on.
"I thought it was both stunning and scary," Clapper, who served under President Barack Obama, told CNN's Anderson Cooper. "I was amazed at that and rather disappointed that the attorney general would say such a thing. The term 'spying' has all kinds of negative connotations and I have to believe he chose that term deliberately."
Barr told lawmakers Wednesday that he would look into the FBI's counterintelligence investigation that began in 2016 of potential ties between members of Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government.
"For the same reason we're worried about foreign influence in elections, I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal," Barr said. "I'm not suggesting those rules were violated but I think it's important to look at. ... I think it's my obligation."
A source familiar with Barr's thinking, however, said that he referred to "spying" in the "classic sense" of intelligence collection, not as "pejorative." The attorney general did not provide evidence of any spying.
Clapper slammed Barr for airing such concerns publicly. He said he would have preferred that Barr ask the Justice Department's inspector general for a briefing on an ongoing investigation into whether the FBI mishandled warrant applications under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
"It would have been far more appropriate for him to just defer to that investigation rather than postulating with apparently no evidence. He just has a feeling that there was spying against the campaign," Clapper added.
Clapper warned that instead of focusing on addressing the investigation's impetus of Russian election meddling, "we're focusing on this circus about whether or not somebody was spying on the campaign, which is, I think, a gross misstatement," he said.
Barr's bombs will likely be viewed as a welcome development to the President, who has regularly called for an investigation and, as recently as last week, told reporters more should be done to examine the origins of the Russia probe.
It will also likely raise concerns of politicization of the Department of Justice's work at an already tense time, as Democrats worry that Barr is bending to the President's demands and have called on Barr to release an unredacted version of the special counsel's confidential report on the Russia investigation to Congress.
Congressional Democrats fumed Wednesday over Barr's statements, accusing the attorney general of mischaracterizing the FBI's counterintelligence investigation in an effort to please Trump.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/04/10/p...mpression=true
Clapper nervous as
That's a troll post.
An affront to fine Americans to be sure.
"I love wikileaks!" ....wait ... "wiki-who?" "i know nothing....it's not my thing!"
^ Hey TSA - ^ would you call that ^ a ....
"lack of candor?"
And it’s only going to get worse for Dems when the entire coup plot is revealed
You always have to go full conspire .
funny how lefty loons call everyone conspiracy theorists while they propped up a conspiracy theory for 2+ yrs and are still propping it up... yeah but everyone else are the nuts!
Projection is in their blood
do you think clintons/podestas were aware of and involved with a child trafficking ring relating to comet ping pong?
21 trolling hard all day every day.
LOOK AT THIS WEIRD PAINTING
doesn't matter when both are so far fetched yet you latch to the whole russian collusion to this day! yall lefty's are all the same s bag hypocrites, liars, cheats, and spineless hacks too.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
