“they indeed disputed Barr’s claims”
“but it’s not 100% fact”
You’re too stupid to pity anyone.
Wasn’t trying to defend anybody. Just found it curious that the line of argument you were using applies equally to the argument we were having earlier. If the devil is in the details, seems your claims of Mueller-Barr cooperation are, to drop the name of a really ty band, highly suspect.
The "indeed" was an opinion. My opinion.“they indeed disputed Barr’s claims”
“but it’s not 100% fact”
You’re too stupid to pity anyone.
I then found an article with some of Mueller's team disputing Barr's assertions that the report is all roses for Trump when its not.
TSA cant tell what's an opinion and what's a fact now. Jesus almighty.
President Derp
You can believe that a report stating the team disputed Barr's claims exists, without believing in, or knowing if, the actual report is true dip .“they indeed disputed Barr’s claims”
“but it’s not 100% fact”
You’re too stupid to pity anyone.
I can't wait til them liberal tears start flowing here on ST and world wide. The left are crybabies already but this is going to be epic!
What is calfilator?
Is this jeopardy? What is you'll never be the woman you wish to be reck no matter how hard you try for $500.
What is it you're waiting for? What tears?
Your tears specifically tranny.
What is it with conservatives and not answering straight up questions when asked.
Who's a conservative? I'm just not you nor your ideology and it bugs you weak s. Get over yourself tranny.
George Conway points out ‘critical’ phrasing in Barr summary that shows Trump may not have been cleared of collusion
Conway noted the very specific phrasing used by Barr that seems to indicate the president is not in the clear when it comes to collusion with the Russians.
Responding to a tweet imploring Reuters to
“please distinguish between no ‘evidence’ and ‘not enough evidence to make a finding,'”
in a recent article, conservative attorney George Conway added his two cents by
noting what AG Barr failed to plainly and clearly state.
If Mueller had used the words ‘no evidence of a conspiracy or coordination’ (i.e., no collusion),
you can be damned sure Barr would have quoted those words.
But Mueller didn’t, and
Barr didn’t.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/george-conway-points-critical-phrasing-barr-summary-shows-trump-may-not-cleared-collusion/
... in the same category of Mueller finding collusion but not enough for the very high bar of absolute certainty of conviction (this ain't a murder trial)
Trash and his mafiya did collude ACTIVELY and have been "forgetting", lying, obstructing for 2 years.
btw, lady-basher The Great Levandowski LIED that that he didn't work with Carter Page.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-14-2019 at 11:27 AM.
exactly the same thing i pointed out - but trump cult whined that their dear leader was exonerated
we saw the conspiracy and the obstruction with our own eyes
only difference is some of us trust our own eyes
What did I claim as fact and then use anonymous secondhand sources to back it?
The "indeed" was an opinion. My opinion.
I then found an article with some of Mueller's team disputing Barr's assertions that the report is all roses for Trump when its not.
TSA cant tell what's an opinion and what's a fact now. Jesus almighty.
Who from Mueller’s team disputed Barr’s assertions?
Mueller was blind the whole time.
New panic at White House after briefing on Mueller report: ‘There is significant concern’ over obstruction
“They have been briefed but I’m told in broad brush strokes,” Karl explained.
“They’ve been briefed enough to know that
the White House will not invoke executive privilege to try to get further redactions.”
“But there is significant concern on the president’s team about what will be in this report,”
“There is significant concerns about what will be in here — new information — on the obstruction of justice question,
what the president was doing regarding some of the big questions.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/new-panic-white-house-officials-briefed-mueller-report-significant-concern/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
White House so panicked they will not invoke executive privilege to try to get further redactions
So Mueller isn’t cooperating with Barr?
we will see how much conspiracy mueller found
i dont believe a word from barr
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
