Reply With Quote
You didn't scan very well, the reasons are mentioned.
Derp admits to reading comprehesion fail. I guess pav is showing derp some sense after all.
You didn't scan very well, the reasons are mentioned.
List them, then. It should say it in the nut graph. It didn't.
Just read the article you .
They are all there.
Don't beg us to hold your hand.
Lashing out.
I already said I scanned it and didn't see it. This isn't my argument; it's not even yours; you're just grudge posting.
You failed.
I already said I scanned it and didn't see it. This isn't my argument; it's not even yours; you're just grudge posting.
You're asking us to do it for you.
We don't need to hear you admit how stupid you are. We already know.
Read the article.
You could have read it three times over already.
You don't have to list reasons if you don't care.
I don't have to list the reasons because they are all there in the article you won't read.
You want to be ignorant. You take pride in it.
I don't.
You don't even know them do you can't justify the purges.
Period.
lol ignorant derp
The article gave him all the ammo he needed, had he been willing to read and repeat what's there.
List your reasons or STFU.
Still waiting to hear about these presumably bad reasons for the voter purge.
Bureaucratic mistakes such as presuming people absent from Georgia, when in fact they still lived at the GA addresses at which they are registered.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...voters-748165/Republican gubernatorial candidate and current Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp incorrectly canceled some 340,000 voter registrations, according to a recent investigation. Although Kemp claimed the voters left the state of Georgia or moved to another country, they hadn’t, Greg Palast, who filed suit against Kemp, wrote in Truthout.
According to John Lenser, who is CEO of CohereOne and who led a review of the list of purged voters for Palast, “340,000 of those voters remained at their original address. They should have never been removed from the voter registration rolls.”
Okay. Fair enough.
(He had to go to another article asshole Pavlov).
It's all in the first article you still haven't read.
ignorant derp
I told you I scanned it. You can put up or shut up, dude.It's all in the first article you still haven't read.
So if you scan an article, but you don't see what's there, it's the responsibility of other posters to tell you what's there?
Wouldn't it be easier just to reread it instead of posting with Pavlov for hours?
Yeah, you said you're a failure when it comes to scanning.
So just actually, you know, read it like a normal human being.
He'd have to read it once to be able reread it.
Everything has to be all out war with this dope. He thinks ignorance is his shield.
You can post if you have like a normal human being.
I think it's the "responsibility" of whoever wants to make a case to make a case.
Chump doesn't want to make a case.
He wants to try and make a W out of me not painstakingly reading the entirety of a poorly written long article. Par.
Also why are you pretending that your fellow sperm shielder has a case? You had to go find another article to make the case. He's claiming your original article explicitly makes the case on cheating. Post the proof if you think you have something, or I'll take it that you're just trolling.
It is when thats pavThetic's M.O. when it comes to others... why are you backing such a loser in the first place?
I did. I said it's in the article you still haven't read.
Why didn't you just read it like a normal human being?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
