It takes a real p.o.s. at this point to sperm shield for Hillary who neglected the Americans on the ground. It was understandable (if not honorable) in theory to be in denial when you considered it an affront to your party's presidential chances. With that out of the way you're just being an utter head.Challenge accepted.
Both TSA and thesannityannex account chalk full of Benghazi . You're a shameless congenital liar.
Next time, dont make it so easy.
Derp has been sprung.
derp leaps into not naming any of her crimes mode
Where’s my claim of Mueller-Barr cooperation? I asked for this once already.
I’ll accept your white flag.
Nothing is more embarrassing than falling for the largest conspiracy theory ever pushed in the history of the Untied States.
Congrats dip , you did.
Here’s one for starters:
Unless you wanna admit this was a completely pointless post??
Which white flag is that? I just proved you massively wrong. That you would lie then consequently argue about such easily proven thing is Trump level of re ed.
Unlike Pav, I will do us both the favor of cutting this short. I proved my point and there is no need of further discussion until the next time you step on it.
Those are direct quotes from Barr and Rosenstein. You tried to compare that to Reck posting secondhand anonymous sources.
You haven’t proven dunce. You probably don’t even realize what you’d need to do to prove your claim so I can’t fault you for tapping out.
Meh, he proved that you abandon each conspiracy theory without admitting it unless you lose a bet or something.
Have you admitted to abandoning the Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy theory yet?
Sure looks like it didn't happen.
Have you admitted to abandoning the Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy theory yet?
It's not like is was completely unfounded.
Sorry.
TSA: Find me a post where I talked about Benghazi
Me: *Finds several posts*
TSA:
Comrade TSA -
so many people defecate on you -
comrade - please retire!
Please provide link to comments made by Rosenstein regarding Mueller-Barr cooperation on redactions.Those are direct quotes from Barr and Rosenstein. You tried to compare that to Reck posting secondhand anonymous sources.
It's a strange infatuation the left has with calling people comrades. Very odd and ironic. I've noticed it quite a bit on twitter and a handful of times here on ST.
Your claim wasn’t me talking about Benghazi. You’re too stupid to even know what you claimed. This is a repeat of when you welshed because you were too stupid to understand the difference between “on” and “from”.TSA: Find me a post where I talked about Benghazi
Me: *Finds several posts*
TSA:
No reason for me to do that as I never claimed such. Your butthurt is clouding your vision and you’re conflating everything now. If you’d read both articles it’d be clear and you wouldn’t look so foolish.
Trump Is Freaking Over Obstruction Of Justice Info In Mueller Report
Trump and the White House are said to be very worried about what former White House Counsel Don McGahn told Mueller about obstruction of justice.
here is significant concerns about what will be in here, new information on the obstruction justice question, on what the president was doing regarding some of the big questions, was he trying to – how much – how far did he go down the line of trying to fire Mueller or talk about firing Mueller, situations surrounding the Comey firing.
And what worries them most is what Don McGahn told the Special Counsel .
Former White House Counsel Don McGahn has visibility on all of this.
It was reported earlier that he spent 30 hours before the Special Counsel.
George, I’m told that significantly more than 30 hours, and here’s the astounding thing.
After all of that time before the Special Counsel,
nobody on the president’s legal team debriefed McGahn about what he was asked by the Special Counsel or what he told the Special Counsel.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/14/trump-is-freaking-over-obstruction-of-justice-info-in-mueller-report.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed& utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29
... as he was hired to do, it will be a coverup, a whitewash
No no we need to state all definitive conclusions right now. Can’t wait for Thursday.
Last edited by spurraider21; 04-15-2019 at 02:05 PM.
This isn’t the first time William Barr tried to fool Congress and the nation with a ‘summary’
by 1989, the U.S. government was profoundly unhappy with de facto Panamanian military dictator Manuel Noriega.
So, then head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel William Barr was given an assignment—
come up with a legal justification for the United States to enter a sovereign country, dispose its leader, kidnap him, and bring him to America to stand trial.
Barr did just that.
As Political Wire reports,
Barr sent Congress a letter on Friday the 13th, 1989, the same day as a massive stock market crash, that concluded that
“the FBI could forcibly abduct people in other countries without the consent of the foreign state.”
Barr made it seem that this position was the
result of a study by the Justice Department and represented the department’s best legal opinion.
But there was a problem. Barr would only provide Congress with “a summary” of that opinion.
Members of Congress asked to see the full legal opinion.
Barr refused, but said he would provide an account that ‘summarizes the principal conclusions.’
In the end, Congress actually acted.
A subpoena was issued, and the DOJ eventually provided Congress with complete information.
What did they discover?
That Barr had “significantly misled” Congress, and that
his “summary” actually failed to fully disclose the study’s principal conclusions,
much less its full opinion on the legality of the proposed action.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1850434
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote