Derp slow now.
Derp always slow tho
My theory is that you are willfully a turd. IF you are unable to contrast their talking points on two similar attacks, then I don't know what to tell you.
One attack suits their political narratives. The other doesn't. I'll let you figure out which is which.
Derp slow now.
Derp always slow tho
I'm still waiting for the contrast.
Saying "world wide" and "global" when talking about Christian prosecution is ridiculously disingenuous when whining about Hillary and Obama word choice
Historical amnesia much? Let's not forget that atheism ravaged the last century.
Lenin's Bolshevik Revolution - led to the death of 10 million people
Stalin's Soviet Purge - led to the death of over 40 million people
Mao Zedong's "Great Leap Forward" - led to the death of over 45 million people
North Korea's Communist Purge under both Kim Il-sung and Kim Jung-Il - led to the death of over 4 million people
Ho Chi Minh's Communist Purge - led to the death of over 20 million people
Lol nobody was killed in the name of atheism.
Persecution, not prosecution, cuck.
And tell us how it's "ridiculously disingenuous".
How so? Christians are targeted throughout Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Polynesia, and now parts of Europe and the Americas. Hence the term World-wide. If you want to characterize the persecution of Christian beliefs and tenets as something else then you do so with willful participation.
Mind you... you completely ignored the point I was trying to make: namely that your leftist leaders/icons can in one breath condemn attacks towards muslims but then fail to condemn them when they are the perpetrators.
Edit: also my term globe --> global was in reference to 50 million annually murdered babies. The comment was made to highlight the fact that the single greatest crime against humanity vastly dwarfs any other conflict (be it war / famine / pestilence / natural disaster / religious conflict / ethnic cleansing / etc...), and to show how numbed down the general populace is concerning this calamity.
Last edited by Phenomanul; 04-23-2019 at 10:53 AM.
Christianity didn't make you a cuck.
Because of your decades-long refusal to accept the fact that lack of belief in a deity empowered secularist humanists to setup their State Religions. State Religions are founded on the belief that people are to depend on the State and not GOD. It's heavily entrenched and rooted in atheistic ideals.
Of course you would never admit it due to your own personal hatred and belligerence towards Christianity.
I see my two year hiatus from the Political Forum hasn't improved your deductive logic or critical thinking skills. Here... let me walk you through it.
You want it spelled out further?
Last edited by Phenomanul; 04-23-2019 at 10:54 AM.
I guess Stalin never came along and killed 20 million of his own people.
History by cuck blake.
evidence where your hated leftist leaders failed to condemn Muslim attacks?
it says what the victims we're doing.
You're really quite stupid.
I can not understate the disingenuousness on display here. Your question seriously... smdh
Answer: Because the specificity that the perpetrators for the Sri Lanka attacks were Islamic terrorists was not stated. The omission can only be interpreted as deliberate given that when the situation was reversed only last month neither Hillary or Obama held back on denouncing and classifying the perpetrators.
Funny how a one-month period can provide such a revealing microcosm of the inherent hypocrisy displayed by the left.
"State Religions are founded on the belief that people are to depend on the State and not GOD"
where are these "state religions"?
"thoughts and prayers" to God are doing for 10Ms of poor Christians in America's precariat (as they subsist Medicare, Medicaid, etc, etc from your hated govt).
Due to the RELIGIOUS hatreds in Sri Lanka, it was not known initially what was the religion of the attackers.
AFAIK, only one SL official has blamed Muslims. It's still early, and SL govt/LE apparently is an incompetent, divided hole.
You're either willfully ignorant, stupid or both. I guess your searches have only been superficial. Several Islamic terror groups have taken credit for the suicide bombings (the go-to attack tactic by radical muslims).
People who consider their leaders to be gods are not atheist.
The Westeners in the hotels were "Easter worshipers" ?
seriously?
That actually goes against your argument since "Easter" clearly implies Christian.
andat your insistence that tweets from non-reporters be all inclusive to describe every victim.
What about the non-westerners at the hotels?
You're really quite stupid.
oh man, he used their middle names. he's serious
what's your definition of religion?
Apparently saying someone worships during Easter is a grave insult.![]()
:: mental gymnastics
So much "acceptance" you've now done a full circle and are discriminating
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)