Reply With Quote
She is fairly revelant on most of the righwing minds.
If you need any proof, just browse the first page of this section. , try this page.
What she's doing now is not much in the way of power or influence. Try again.
She is fairly revelant on most of the righwing minds.
If you need any proof, just browse the first page of this section. , try this page.
??? Is that like 4D chess?
You may not be all that far off. It's definitely about a lot of stuff under the surface. This idea that it's about ego is misguided, imo.??? Is that like 4D chess?
She’s a former First Lady and politician... books and interviews is how they make their money.. see her husband, Barack, Mic e, Carter, etc
It’s about power and money, like it always is. Realistically, she isn’t running, at least this time around though.
IMO, Biden is in the same boat, even if you overlook the whole creepiness factor.
Too old, too easy to tie to the previous admin (which liberals loved, but conservatives hated), no new ideas
The idea that it's about hawking books is silly. Her last book was a total flop.
Holy .
Undignified compared to the orange ape...
She lost to him, right?
Come to terms.
He'll always regret not running in 2016 when being an extension of Obama was actually just about at peak levels in terms of favorability.
absolutely lost...
But not because of dignity.
Dont be a gd fool...
Look up dignity please.
Nothing dignified about corruption or being the enemy of dead Americans. You should've gotten out
of the echo chamber about how it was all right wing smears and found a better candidate.
So Trump has more dignity than Hillary Clinton.
What half-way house do you live in?
Agreed, it's a desperate attempt at keeping power and influence that's failing miserably.
You should just give up on the narrative that she's hatching some maniacal plot to run for president again.
Biden would be lucky if he were viewed comparably to Obama. He's been around decades and no one knows what he actually stands for, he's just kind of been "there" as the class clown of the Democratic party for years. The fact he's a Delaware politician who avoids taking a stance on specific issues at all costs makes it obvious he's another corporate centrist.
You're wrong about that.
The Clintons still have power and will some influence in the political arena as long as Bill and she's around, imo.
Who do you is responsible for rolling out Kamala Harris?
Read a couple of years ago that the Clintons invited her to their big donors and such.
Half the dem candidates running now have been influenced by one Clinton or the other at some point.
Absolutely.
Keeping herself relevant for a run is definitely top three.
Just like how you were sure she'd be running in 2020.
Well I guess this means Kamala Harris has your vote if she's the closest thing there is to Hillary.You're wrong about that.
The Clintons still have power and will some influence in the political arena as long as Bill and she's around, imo.
Who do you is responsible for rolling out Kamala Harris?
Read a couple of years ago that the Clintons invited her to their big donors and such.
Half the dem candidates running now have been influenced by one Clinton or the other at some point.
I don't recall ever saying I was sure she was running. But she was absolutely maneuvering for a possible 2020.
That was only gonna succeed if the narrative of Trump being a failure had worked.
Actually no.
You're as obssessed with the Clintons as much as derp is. Just compare how many times I have brought up Hillary's name since 2016 compare to how much you love to talk about her.
You'd win.
True, you were very careful about saying she may or may not run, that way you could say you were right regardless of what happened.
I was right. She clearly had a desire to run in 2020. Things didn't fall her way. She'll hope they fall her way in 2024, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions