As I said a few days ago, the path to winning is a repeat of game 1: Hope they have early jitters, capitalize on that, then once they find their footing, hang on for dear life and survive.
Also need continued progression (Spurs) and regression (Nuggets) to the mean from 3, which can be somewhat aided by not needlessly doubling Jokic and to a lesser extent Millsap, especially one pass away.
I don't care how much Jokic scores 1-on-1 vs Poeltl and Aldridge. I'll live with it so long as they avoid foul trouble, limits 3s and force his out of shape, due for some regression to the mean ass, to play 40ish minutes, while having to either repeatedly create his own offense or rumble to the rim and finish on the roll.
I disagree . . .
- If they can't beat a team like the Nuggets now, when they're playoff neophytes, why would they be able to as their core inches closer to its collective prime while they fade from theirs?
- The talent gap is not nearly as wide as the perception seems to be. The Spurs, who had to integrate 8 new players, have been better since the All-Star break, if not when the calendar turned to '19.
- Even though I'd pick the Trail Blazers to beat them (though Kanter's injury could be big, because Aldridge would likely destroy Aminu, Leonard, Collins), the so called mid 3 might never have a better chance of reaching the Conference Finals.
- They better be arguing this Poeltl "illegal screens" panic routine from Malone behind the screens. They probably need him to play around 30 minutes.