Great, back up that claim.
It's been over two years.As for Trump giving Hillary a pass, it would seem he has not communicated that the Barr.
What's the hold up?
What are the multiple felonies?
I am all for the House voting on it. There is more than enough evidence of multiple felonies in the Mueller report as well as serious Cons utional violations of all sorts. I can give you a laundry list if you want, but given that you can't or won't do your homework of actually reading, you know, facts, I am not sure it is worth my time.
doesn't read the Mueller report, but just KNOWs what is in it, because... reasons
![]()
Great, back up that claim.
It's been over two years.As for Trump giving Hillary a pass, it would seem he has not communicated that the Barr.
What's the hold up?
What are the multiple felonies?
Where's your proof of the 3 million illegal votes?
Looks like you lied tbh.
Or were you simply misinformed?
What's your perception of the reality that your claim is bull ?
So setting aside the multiple felonies committed by Trump evidenced in the Mueller Report, let's take a look.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...onable/588496/For example, Benjamin Wittes and Jane Chong, my colleagues at Lawfare, argued way back in August 2017 that Trump’s pardon of former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio merited consideration in an impeachment inquiry. Arpaio, remember, was convicted of criminal contempt for his refusal to cease detaining people only on the su ion that they had flouted immigration law. According to The Washington Post, Trump first asked then–Attorney General Jeff Sessions whether the Justice Department could drop the prosecution of Arpaio, then decided to pardon him if Arpaio was convicted at trial. How else to describe this process but as abuse of power?
What about his recent instructions to Border Patrol officers, as reported by CNN, to disobey the courts in turning back asylum seekers? His repeated calls for the criminal prosecution of his political rivals? His demands for the U.S. Postal Service to dramatically raise rates for shipping Amazon packages, for no obvious reason other than to punish Amazon CEO and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos? His rescinding of the security clearances of a number of his high-profile critics, including former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan? Or consider his repeated decisions to overrule his own intelligence agencies in declassifying sensitive information related to the Russia investigation in order to score political points, with apparent disregard for the potential consequences to the country.
There is a bit more to it, of course. Life outside the conservative delusional bubble of Fox news paints a pretty damning picture of a president -bent to willfully abuse his office in ways that would shock the framers of our cons ution.
Meanwhile, the catalog of presidential misconduct did not stop at the release of the Mueller report. Trump recently declared his administration’s plans to resist “all the subpoenas” headed his way from Congress, and has taken the unprecedented step of suing, in his personal capacity, House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah mings over a subpoena to Trump’s accounting firm. In 1974, along with articles of impeachment for abuse of power and obstruction of justice, the House Judiciary Committee recommended Nixon’s impeachment on the basis that he had “failed without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives … and willfully disobeyed such subpoenas.” The Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden recently suggested that Congress would have “no alternative but to go to … impeachment” if Trump continues to stonewall congressional investigations.
Speaking of truth and misinformation, did you ever get off your lazy ass and look for proof of the "3 million or more" non-citizens voting? Or have you given up your search for the real killers, OJ?
muh Hillary
You know all of this for tat is just stupid...I do not care what anyone has on anything. I want it over....
So....
Either vote for impeachment or shut up about Trump and his crimes. If the House, controlled by the Democrats, will not put impeachment to a vote, NOW, then impeachment is not what they want.
....and please, shut up about it.
I have made my position clear. I do not think Trump is guilty of anything but embarrassing the Democrats in November 2016, but I am all for voting to impeach him.
So vote!
Yes, up to and including murder.
Try this....go to LA county and get 100 random names on the voters registration list....if legal....then go to address given and ask them if they are a citizen of the USA.
You don’t think there are marines that are f@ggots![]()
Try this:
Prove your ing claim.
So no, you don't have a shred of proof for the claim "millions of non-citizens voted", just like the guy who claims voter fraud when he actually had to pony up in a court, and failed miserably.Speaking of truth and misinformation, did you ever get off your lazy ass and look for proof of the "3 million or more" non-citizens voting?
Is truth important to you? It would seem not, based on your lack of evidence for what you think is true in this case. Do you consider yourself gullible?
If you had actually been not lazy and read the Mueller report, you would have a much more informed opinion as to that. As it is, believing what others say about it, without reading it is simply more evidence of your gullibility.
he or she is a drone, programmed to spew every checkbox, every piece of , at ude, bias, propaganda, lie from Trash, Repugs, Fox, right wing hate media.
VOTE!
You're scared little children. Vote for impeachment!
Last edited by a777pilot; 05-04-2019 at 07:38 AM.
Not sure who you're shouting at, RG already said he's for impeachment, Reck and boutons probably are too.
Then vote.
If impeachment is what the Democrats want, then vote. All that is needed is 218 vote to impeach and Trump is impeached. Why are you Democrats/Liberals waiting?
Soft kitty, warm kitty,
Little ball of fur.
Happy kitty, warm kitty,
Purr, purr, purr.
I don't get a vote, silly.
I happen to think impeachment is a bad idea tactically for the Dems if they want to beat Trump in 2020. But I can also see the strategic necessity of standing up for the rule of law. The GOP didn't let Clinton get away with his lies without a scrape, maybe the Dems shouldn't let Trump get away with his.
you see any on the left standing against spying on a duly elected president? you're on the side of snakes... stay in the grass.
That doesn't look like proof of millions of non-citizens voting in the last election. It's almost as if you don't have any.
This may shock you, but a 70+ year old white male is simply aping what he hears on Fox news, as the talking heads over there are all aping this line of taunt at the moment.
Try not to be surprised.
I actually agree. Best thing strategically for Democrats for Trump to be front and center on the ballot in 2020, at least in the states that won't pass a "release your tax return or you dont' get on the ballot" law between now and then.
Let's pass a national law that only US citizens can vote in federal elections and to do so voters must be able to prove US citizenship when they register and then must provide a government issued photo ID to actually vote.
If you are of the opinion that there is no voter fraud, then you will have no problem supporting this idea.
Well, do you support my idea?
sure, impeach Trash, Barr, Kavanaugh
The Dems don't have the crazy balls to out-crazy the traitorous Repugs.
The Capitalists and evangelicals elect Repugs to drive America towards (theocratic) autocracy.
There will be stalls in that drive for autocracy (eg, Dems winning the House in 2018, but with any Dem bills killed by Repug Senate),
but America is inevitably ed and un able.
Meh, you can't even support your own idea that 3 million people voted illegally in 2016.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)