So, impeach him and prosecute his family on obscure charges and see how that works out for you. , maybe Baron knew something too. Don't forget him.
he will be impeached
and the law is the law - only criminals and criminal sympathizers refer to crimes as
”obscure charges”
and on jan 21,2021
trump himself will also be indicted for several felonies that the DOJ policy will not be able to protect him from
So you're not in favor of actually upholding the law in such a case?
You're genuinely upset for Ivanka.
If they broke the law it needs to be done. Not sure how anyone could argue that.
Right? It's not like she isn't part of the government due to det nepotism in the first place.
CC's knee-jerk paternalism and sexism make her off limits somehow.
Exactly. Trump made them fair game when he gave them positions within his campaign and our government. I don't believe in going after them for s and giggles, but if any of them broke the law or are suspected of doing so, it needs to be addressed.
Was he also given White House duties and a pass to see intelligence information?
Is Barron formulating a peace plan with Israel? Trump brought his family in.
Trash gave Kushner top secret clearance over the objections of security people. Kushner is fair game.
It's more of a gray zone like Hillarys emails. Yeah, she clearly broke the law, but mark it down to "gross negligence" and move on. You guys sound just like the pitchfork crew that was after Hillary.
lol "was"
What are you saying Ivanka was "negligent" about?
CC was a founding member of the pitchfork crew here, well before 2016.
I'm not. You are the ones scratching for anything to charge the family with just out of spite.
Surely it's appropriate to investigate corruption if there seems to be evidence for it.
Ivanka--> Inauguration shenanigans
Kushner --> Qatar
Meh. I think getting humiliated by a moron like Trump was enough punishment for Hillary.
You rode her ass for (at least) ten solid years (that I know of -- I joined this board in 2008) with barely a let up. Almost as if out of spite.
Not that there's anything wrong with that. Passion is part of politics.
Not to the level you are trying to claim. I still say they were just as surprised as we were when Trump actually won the election. Up to that point I think it was just trumps egotistical and narcissistic brand building.
How did you come to this conclusion?
I wont argue that point. I have never liked Hillary.
So perhaps you can understand and empathize with the passion of others against Trump and the beneficiaries of his nepotistic largesse.
I never underestimated the passion. Boutons is a perfect example. He has literally dedicated his life to spamming this forum 24/7/365 and has yet to convert a single person. Now that's passion.
So you want her put above the law because why?
First, why don't you explain what law you claim she broke.
I don't have to. I say she should be treated like anyone else when it comes to the law.
You think she should be above that law.
Why?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
