NBA: LMAO dame > steph

[R. DeMurre]

*

[313]

Nobody thought that. We said Dame > Westbrook, which is true.

Many act as if you could replace steph with any above average PG and warriors would be just as good

[therealtruth]

Shooting percentage is a function of skill and shot selection. Curry's shot selection is much better. Dame is at best a poor man's Curry. He's simply not good enough to be a first option on a championship team.

[FrostKing]

Shooting percentage is a function of skill and shot selection. Curry's shot selection is much better. Dame is at best a poor man's Curry. He's simply not good enough to be a first option on a championship team.

As if Curry was the reason GS won Game 4. It was their depth and bench scoring which opponents such as Portland and Denver don't have.

I saw the highlights, Curry bricking unable to put Portland away.

[Spurtacular]

Trade Curry and Lillard and it's still a GS sweep, tbh. But I'll admit Lillard looked to defer too much, so I'll give the edge on overall to Curry and the edge on pure shooting to Lillard.

[TDfan2007]

Trade Curry and Lillard and it's still a GS sweep, tbh. But I'll admit Lillard looked to defer too much, so I'll give the edge on overall to Curry and the edge on pure shooting to Lillard.

Curry took a steaming all over Lillard this series. It wasn't even close. He outplayed him about to the same extent Lillard outplayed Westbrook in the first round.

There are levels to greatness, and the playoffs tend to show it best. Steph > Lillard >> Westbrick

[Spurtacular]

Curry took a steaming all over Lillard this series. It wasn't even close. He outplayed him about to the same extent Lillard outplayed Westbrook in the first round.

There are levels to greatness, and the playoffs tend to show it best. Steph > Lillard >> Westbrick

Curry had a good series against a weak Portland defense. Lillard had a bad series against a good Warriors defense.

I already said I give the edge to Curry; but this isn't an apples to apples comparison.