Reply With Quote
Not a cry thread at all, liar.
It is merely a chance for any of you ass-kissers to finally claim to have actually read the report, rather than take the word of a con man for what it says.
Do you know how gullible you look?
For those who don’t like or are unable to read, Sam Harris had a nice post-mortem with Benjamin Wittes on his podcast. Highly recommend
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas...=1000438890298
^ for this in the Apple ecosystem.
Android users.
Not a cry thread at all, liar.
It is merely a chance for any of you ass-kissers to finally claim to have actually read the report, rather than take the word of a con man for what it says.
Do you know how gullible you look?
Both considered the ACA to be a good thing. I can see though, why you would want to change the subject from your gullibility.Yes. At the time I was auditing HMOs, a couple of which were owned by hospital systems. Had a good hour long talk with both the HMO CEO and senior staff on it, as well as a separate conversation with the hospital system CEO.
Funny thing is that it really wasn't as large of a law as people think once it was condensed out of the format they normally put laws in. (double spaced, narrow columns).
It's not a cry thread
As fellow snowflakes, maybe.
As competent admins, absolutely not.
What is your specific problem with the ACA aside from the fact you were instructed not to like it.
Talking out of your ass again. I've said how it adversely affected me multiple times now.
Am I to take it from your tone that you're a proponent of the scam?
But you never read it.
Nope. I'm for accelerating the inevitability of single payer.Am I to take it from your tone that you're a proponent of the scam?
What's your alternative?
Let's see it.
Still haven't read the Mueller report.
I am a proponent of universal health insurance. Everybody pays a tax to their ability to pay, and everybody is covered to a reasonable minimum. This is not difficult.
The ACA was better than what came before it, because more people got coverage. Don't remember your foibles, but get a ing helmet or, you know, make a cry thread about it.
Still waiting on TSA
Read it yet, smoochy?
WTF is "reasonable"?and why "minimum".
what do you consider health care beyond "reasonable minimum", which I assume means the patient pays for the unreasonable health care, up to the maximum?
Heard about it for two years nonstop and still have no desire to read it.Still haven't read the Mueller report.
Biggest nothing burger of all-time.
And that's the lowering of standards. People don't even get reasonable minimums once you take the market out of it. You're a ing shmuck.I am a proponent of universal health insurance. Everybody pays a tax to their ability to pay, and everybody is covered to a reasonable minimum. This is not difficult.
The ACA was better than what came before it, because more people got coverage. Don't remember your foibles, but get a ing helmet or, you know, make a cry thread about it.
If you won't read it, how do you know it is a nothing burger?Heard about it for two years nonstop and still have no desire to read it.
Biggest nothing burger of all-time.
What, in your opinion, are the most damning parts?
Manafort data sharing with Kilimnik and the back and forth over wikileaks data for the collusion end.
There are four pretty solid instances of obstruction of justice, with arguably about 4 more that could be put forth out of the 12 odd that were considered.
Neither Manafort nor Kilimnik were charged for any data sharing. No one on the Trump campaign nor Wikileaks was charged for conspiring/coordinating/colluding with each other, it wasn't even hinted at in the Mueller report and Mueller flat out debunks it in the Corsi statement of the offense. There was no coordination with Wikileaks, stop peddling lies.
When I talk to delusional Christians they say the same kinds things about "what science says", while demonstrating a complete lack of understanding. The mental gymnastics required to retain delusional belief systems are amusing. You don't understand the context of what Mueller found because you haven't done the work.
I can't read the report for you. No point in saying much more than that.
You must've missed the part where I heard about this for two years.
Try following along, kidnapper.
You "heard about it".
But you didn't read it.
You probably heard about that evilution too.
You "heard about it".
But you didn't read it.
You probably heard about that evilution too.
LOL, derp just logged in and already getting skull ed.
You try so hard.You "heard about it".
But you didn't read it.
You probably heard about that evilution too.
You fail so hard.
"heard about it".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
