Trump turns the full force of the government on perceived political enemies

[Chucho]

There is nothing to win here, derp.

Ever.

Are you just trying for what you think are wins?

By his own words, his grudge posts are just paying you tribute.

[Spurtacular]

There is nothing to win here

Given your inadequacy as a poster, I can see how you'd have that take.

[Pavlov]

Given your inadequacy as a poster, I can see how you'd have that take.

OK, what is here for you to win, derp?

[Spurtacular]

By his own words, his grudge posts are just paying you tribute.

Nope. Different posters have different motivations. I'm not the bitter little you are, Crusty.

[Pavlov]

Nope. Different posters have different motivations. I'm not the bitter little you are, Crusty.

What are your motivations?

[Chucho]

Nope. Different posters have different motivations. I'm not the bitter little you are, Crusty.

No need to lash out. No one's bitter. You're just cranky and upset everyone is laughing at you and ting on you relentlessly and your pitiful coping mechs can't keep your false bravado up.

LOL derp, what's your motivation? Stalking men for 2+ years on a message board? Becoming the easiest walking target on SpursTalk? Both?

[Spurtacular]

No need to lash out. No one's bitter. You're just cranky and upset everyone is laughing at you and ting on you relentlessly and your pitiful coping mechs can't keep your false bravado up.

LOL derp, what's your motivation? Stalking men for 2+ years on a message board? Becoming the easiest walking target on SpursTalk? Both?

You always bitter, son.
Crusty still clinging to his strength in numbers paradigm.

[Chucho]

You always bitter, son.
Crusty still clinging to his strength in numbers paradigm.

LOL, the irony of derp trying to sound smart with a synonym for narrative while spinning one.

derp's the house rat of ST, lunacy and all.

[Winehole23]

Trump investigation did Trump initiate?

Your quasi grammatical informality stands out.

Is that imitative or spontaneous? Rehearsed in the mirror?

[RandomGuy]

Barr gave you and the public 99.9% of the Mueller report that the public had no legal right to see and now you think he’s going to hide things? It’s going to be really amusing watching you trip over your trying to defend the same deep state you loathe.

Mueller came out and said Barr's characterization was vastly inaccurate. Why do you think that is?

[boutons_deux]

"Barr gave you and the public 99.9% of the Mueller report"

in 4 pages! 99.9%

4 pages of lies by Repug famous coverup artist (Iran Contra)

[RandomGuy]

No.

And none of the people you still won’t mention who you claim were his political opponents are investigators either.

So, the head of the FBI isn't an investigator? Strok and Paige weren't? You really didn't read the OP yet stil, did you jackboot?

Isn't in charge of investigators that might be intimidated if their boss was fired for not interfering with their investigation?

So presidents shouldn't be allowed to interfere in investigations. Good. Now what do you do when a president does exactly that?

Efforts to fire Mueller

“Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

. Efforts to curtail Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference

“Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”

[TSA]

Mueller came out and said Barr's characterization was vastly inaccurate. Why do you think that is?

No he didn’t you lying

[TSA]

So, the head of the FBI isn't an investigator? Strok and Paige weren't? You really didn't read the OP yet stil, did you jackboot?

Isn't in charge of investigators that might be intimidated if their boss was fired for not interfering with their investigation?

So presidents shouldn't be allowed to interfere in investigations. Good. Now what do you do when a president does exactly that?

None of them were investigators when the comments in your OP was made.

[RandomGuy]

None of them were investigators when the comments in your OP was made.

... and there is the quibble that doesn't mean a goddamn thing.

Would a current investigator, charged into looking to the president, be intimidated if the president ordered the previous investigators to be themselves investigated?

You really suck at this critical thinking thing. It is fun to watch you struggle, tbh.

[RandomGuy]

So presidents shouldn't be allowed to interfere in investigations. Good. Now what do you do when a president does exactly that?

None of them were investigators when the comments in your OP was made.

Not really an answer, jackboot.

So presidents shouldn't be allowed to interfere in investigations. Good. Now what do you do when a president does exactly that?

[TSA]

... and there is the quibble that doesn't mean a goddamn thing.

Would a current investigator, charged into looking to the president, be intimidated if the president ordered the previous investigators to be themselves investigated?

You really suck at this critical thinking thing. It is fun to watch you struggle, tbh.

struggle

You're the one just making up and responding in multiple posts to my same quote.

If a current investigator was doing things by the book they'd have nothing to worry about. Your problem is you keep looking at the previous investigation as if it were based on legit information when it wasn't.