That is not good news for trump/barr
or the cult
That is not good news for trump/barr
or the cult
he is now free to answer questions
barr/trump cannot muzzle him now
‘Freudian slip?’ The internet mocks Trump for tweeting his own confession that Russia helped him
President Donald Trump claimed a right to obstruct justice — and accidentally admitted that Russia helped get him elected.
The president spent Thursday morning raging about special counsel Robert Mueller,
who delivered his first public remarks about the Russia investigation the day before, and
insisted his apparent efforts to impede the probe were justified because he thought the case was unfair.
“Russia, Russia, Russia!” Trump tweeted. “That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax…And now Russia has disappeared because
I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.![]()
![]()
It was a crime that didn’t exist.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/fre...8460&list_id=1
TSA all over the map
What did Q say about this stuff?
All over the map in full deflection mode.
I hope he gets every penny he’s seeking in his defamation lawsuits. De able what the government did to him.
What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant, TSA?
Lol
carter page
a guy who went to russia to speak AGAINST the usa
is the guy idiots like tsa defend
"I was a Macedonian fake news writer"
In North Macedonia, there’s a small industry of websites publishing misleading and inflammatory political articles targeted at US readers.
Tamara was rewriting fabricated or misleading articles for two major copycat websites based in North Macedonia targeting US readers.
Her
job was to churn out semi-plagiarised copies of articles originally published on US extreme right-wing publications, so that her boss could serve them back to unsuspecting Americans thousands of miles away.
Tamara, who describes herself as a liberal, was horrified by the content of the articles she had to rewrite. “I believe they still have the worst articles,” she says,
On closer inspection, the articles would contain glaring inaccuracies and images taken from different events entirely. Tamara was told to simply find images using Google to attach to the articles she published.
Much of what she produced was misinformation based on real events, written in a way to provoke fear and anger among its readers.
In the aggregate, the stories gave a false, skewed view of the world, playing to people’s prejudices.
“It was propaganda and brainwashing in the way of telling the story,”
Tamara’s job was to rewrite the original US articles so that they couldn’t be detected as plagiarised text, as well as making them more compact and even more likely to be shared on social media, generating Google ad revenue
A similar fake news site based out of Veles with around a million Facebook likes has been claimed by its owner to be able to make upwards of $2,000 per day in an interview with CNN.
Marco ran two sites, which Tamara told me had more than two million Facebook followers combined. “The whole time I was typing and writing these stories,
I was always thinking ‘Oh my God, who would believe this kind of garbage?
How uneducated, how low intelligence do you have to be just to read them’.
It’s hard to read these articles.
They are long, maybe 1,000 words and the whole article maybe contains two sentences of news and
after that everything is just insults. It’s hard to read. It’s not pleasant,”
My take was that if people are stupid enough to believe these stories, maybe they deserve this.
If they think this is the truth, then maybe they deserve this as a way of punishment.”
Marco’s website is far from alone. In 2016, just a week before the US presidential election, Buzzfeed revealed that more than 140 “fake news” US politics websites were run out of Veles, the home of Marco’s site.
Veles is a small, decaying town, littered with dormant factories and run-down amenities such as an abandoned swimming pool –
yet the teens who run these sites claimed to earn thousands of US dollars per month or even several thousand dollars per day on a good day.
In the final three months of the 2016 US Presidential race,
fake or “hyperpartisan” news sites overtook mainstream news producers in their share of the top 20 election stories being shared on Facebook,
it has been widely believed that the fake news websites operated out of North Macedonia emerged spontaneously
“patient zero” was allegedly Macedonian media lawyer Trajche Arsov, who worked with a pair of high-profile US partners, including Paris Wade, a Republican candidate who recently ran for the Nevada State Assembly.
The sad truth is that now it has also become a home for websites that fuel disharmony and polarisation elsewhere – this time, thousands of miles away in the US.
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/2019...ke-news-writer
Obviously, lots of Spurtalkers are "people ... stupid enough to believe these stories"
Had the Trump campaign listed all their foreign contacts then they would've been doing it by the book you colossal idiot.
Barr prophesies "fruition" for DOJ matters related to HRC.
Read the bolded to get a flavor of the context in which his original grudge was nursed.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/william...ve-2019-05-31/JAN CRAWFORD: Um, what's the status of Huber's investigation in Utah? I think the former Attorney General Sessions had asked him to look at this.
WILLIAM BARR: Right, so Huber had originally been asked to take a look at the FISA applications and the electronic surveillance but then he stood back and put that on hold while the Office of Inspector General was conducting its review, which would've been normal for the department. And he was essentially on standby in case Mr. Horowitz referred a matter to him to be handled criminally. So he has not been active on this front in recent months and so Durham is taking over that role. The other issues he's been working on relate to Hillary Clinton. Those are winding down and hopefully we'll be in a position to bring those to fruition.
JAN CRAWFORD: So he won't be involved in this really at all then?
WILLIAM BARR: No.
JAN CRAWFORD: This is his role, it's done?
WILLIAM BARR: Right.
JAN CRAWFORD: And now Durham is going to pick up--
WILL BARR: Yes, right.
JAN CRAWFORD: --this. So again, just to go, just so that I think so people can more fully understand this, I mean have you, and I know it's early in the investigation, but when we are talking about the basis for this and why you think it is important and obviously any kind of government abuse of power, I mean, you were in the CIA in the '70s. You can see how that can have....
WILLIAM BARR: Right, when I, when I joined the CIA almost 50 years ago as an intern and this was during the Vietnam, civil rights era and there had been a lot...there were a lot of pending investigations of the CIA and there the issues were what was- when was it appropriate for intelligence agencies, the FBI too was under investigation. You know, the penetration of civil rights groups because at the time there was concerns about contacts with, you know, communist funded front groups and things like that and you know how deeply could you get into civil rights groups or anti-Vietnam war groups. A lot of these groups were in contact with foreign adversaries, they had some contact with front organizations and so forth and there were a lot of rules put in place and those rules are under the attorney general. The attorney general's responsibility is to make sure that these powers are not used to tread upon first amendment activity and that certainly was a big part of my formative years of dealing with those issues. The fact that today people just seem to brush aside the idea that it is okay to you know, to engage in these activities against a political campaign is stunning to me especially when the media doesn't seem to think that it's worth looking into. They're supposed to be the watchdogs of, you know, our civil liberties.
JAN CRAWFORD: What have you seen? What evidence? What makes you think, I need to take a look at this? I mean, what have you seen in the summer of 2016?
WILLIAM BARR: Well, I'll say at this point is that it, you know, I- like many other people who are familiar with intelligence activities, I had a lot of questions about what was going on. I assumed I'd get answers when I went in and I have not gotten answers that are well satisfactory, and in fact probably have more questions, and that some of the facts that- that I've learned don't hang together with the official explanations of what happened.
JAN CRAWFORD: What do you mean by that?
WILLIAM BARR: That's all I really will say. Things are just not jiving, and I'm not saying at this stage that--
He is so full of
let me translate for him : “hannity and trump and I have a narrative to deflect attention away from trump and russia stealing the 2016 election - and if people are stupid and gullible enough - we will succeed eventually.”
the power vest, the legs spread wide. the prim/smug swagger.
pretty soon guys like this will being going around on cop hunts in their Chevy Suburbans, to flaunt their impunity under law.
their ILLEGAL foreign contacts
who were offering ILLEGAL help for Trash, and pain for Hillary
Trash and his mafiya willingly accepted Pootin's help, and then lied, forgot, obstructed about the contacts.
So Huber didn't do and is done.
Durham isn't doing and won't do .
Barr hasn't found so he just talks .
lol Trumpistas
why was pavlov's hair so soft.
he conditioned it.
Evidence bad now.
I thought the judge asked for "all" voicemails.
Apparently the government tailored their reply to an order of the court to render all.
What ever could have caused them to do so?
What ever could have caused the lawyer to leave the voicemail asking for a heads up if the president was implicated, what's up with that?
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)