Julie Annie attacking Mueller
Rudy Giuliani threatens $17 million legal action against Robert Mueller during Fox News interview
Giuliani was incensed that Mueller did not come to a prosecutorial conclusion on Trump’s obstruction of justice.
“It was a dereliction of duty,” Giuliani claimed.
“Why do you appoint an independent counsel, a special counsel?
Theoretically there’s some kind of conflict, they are supposed to make a decision,”
“I think I might bring a qui tam action to get that money back for the government,”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/rudy-giuliani-threatens-17-million-legal-action-against-robert-mueller-during-fox-news-interview/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
Julie Annie attacking Mueller
Rudy Giuliani threatens $17 million legal action against Robert Mueller during Fox News interview
Giuliani was incensed that Mueller did not come to a prosecutorial conclusion on Trump’s obstruction of justice.
“It was a dereliction of duty,” Giuliani claimed.
“Why do you appoint an independent counsel, a special counsel?
Theoretically there’s some kind of conflict, they are supposed to make a decision,”
“I think I might bring a qui tam action to get that money back for the government,”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/rudy-giuliani-threatens-17-million-legal-action-against-robert-mueller-during-fox-news-interview/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
It's never too late - I am sure that Mueller can humor the idiots -
Go ahead and indict the criminal president - if they continue begging for it!
lol if they didnt want a special counsel all trump had to do was not fire comey because of the russia thing.
and lol bongino being just as gullible as TSA, parroting undercover huber's garbage reading comprehension
Never in any of this has our president ever lied or been associated with criminals.
This is all a big blue team hoax to discredit a great orange man.
So where are we on the deep state now investigating Russian interference?
Where does the tangerine stand on this at this moment in time?
DOJ spurns a court order. Contempt for the law and ins utions of the law are DJT hallmarks.
This particular jabba the hut Republican has aligned himself with Trump so closely because he believes in the dominance of the executive branch.
When the red team goes down, they go down hard. Its gonna be very difficult for the rats to leave a rapidly sinking ship. And the ship will sink.
The ship could sink so rapidly I got a bit of fear for boutons-like blue team members basically performing the same lying lawlessness when ins utions are weakened. "Voting does not work. The corporations of the world are the enemy, anarchy now"
This current group must be defeated in a manner involving truth and respect for the law.
Otherwise we take a hard exit from this crappy regime. Imo... Especially if Trump has another term. We take a huge risk of a historically unfair backlash.
NYT and HuffPo curious as well
Are you talking about the lawyer from Mueller’s team spurning a court order?
Who supervises Mueller?
It's Bob Barr's DOJ, not Mueller's.
they cut out a lot of uhm, urr, type stuff. as long as you dont change the substance of the sentences, its a very normal practice. the supreme court itself does it in its decisions.
he left out "for the country" but included "for national security" so its not misleading or changing the meaning of the sentence.
its standard practice and any claims that the quotes were misleading/misrepresentative display poor reading comprehension
remember what we’ve always said about the President and his feelings toward Flynn and, that still remains.”
From WP
so what are Trump's feelings about Flynn?
He lied and received money thru his political position.
A soldier did this... a true public servant. A patriot....
This is not how I thought things worked.
Barr does not want the public to hear what Flynn said - that caused the Judge to accuse him of treason -
and selling out his country.
"Republicans for the Rule of Law" (oxymoron much?)
Ran this ad/video on FOX news - embarrassing the out of Graham/Rubio/McCarthy/et al - and making their case that the GOP is not putting country before party - great two minute video;
https://twitter.com/ForTheRuleOfLaw/...40551001980928
What has changed since .. oh.. 2 years ago.. something that actually matters.
(jeopardy theme here)
Dear Robert Mueller: Your report can’t speak for itself
Mr. Mueller, your job is not done yet. In fact, it’s a long way from done. It’s honorable of you to act as if you are part of a process that’s on the level.
But there is nothing by-the-book
in how President Trump and Attorney General William P. Barr have responded to your findings
about Russian interference in the 2016 election or your evidence about Trump’s obstruction of justice.
I’m sorry, Mr. Mueller.
“All but said” is not good enough. Do you say it, or do you not?
You are dealing here with
a president happy to tear the law and the truth — and, for that matter, you — to pieces.
Do you feel no responsibility to set the record straight when Trump distorts it day after day?
You claim that, under the rules, it would have been wrong for you to say Trump broke the law.
But that’s not what your boss, the attorney general, says.
“I personally felt he could’ve reached a decision,” Barr
he could’ve reached a decision as to whether it was criminal activity. But he had his reasons for not doing it.”
The public has a right to know what’s going on here.
you can make up for that by going before Congress and doing what comes naturally to you:
You can tell the truth.
You say you want your written work to “speak for itself.”
But a do ent cannot respond to Barr’s distortions and Trump’s lies.
Only you can speak for it, and, yes, explain it.
Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.), a former federal prosecutor
, she wants to learn more before she decides because “you’re always on your strongest footing when you have all the information you can have.”
But she is surprised that you think a written account is enough.
“As a federal prosecutor, I never had an investigator deliver a report and say, ‘I’m not going to further discuss this,’ ” she told me.
“He has to come before Congress and further discuss his report.”
“I wish he would answer questions, that he wouldn’t hint at what we should do but spell it out,” McGovern said in an interview.
“He speaks in ways that are open to interpretation. Sometimes, he’s like a Ouija board.”
Pelosi ... ,”Congress and the country really do have a right to know more.
“While he may have thought these were the priority points to make to the public,” she said, rather diplomatically,
“there may be questions relating to these facts that members of Congress would have.”
you made it inevitable that politics would overwhelm the substance of your probe.
You opened the way for Trump and Barr to try to bury the very issues you want the public and Congress to consider.
you have to raise your voice and undo the lies.
This is a moment when, quite literally, truth and justice demand that you get out of your comfort zone.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dear-robert-mueller-your-report-cant-speak-for-itself/2019/06/02/02dc1c9a-8491-11e9-933d-7501070ee669_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dc 21b77ff418
I said "I'll just click on the post, so what it's ignored... but I bet it's just an article and a link"
Click
Article and a link
Boutonbot.exe
poor fella doesn’t know it had nothing to do with Barr and was a Mueller team lawyer who spurned the court order
It is the Justice deptpoor fella doesn’t know it had nothing to do with Barr and was a Mueller team lawyer who spurned the court order
Barr is the in corrupt traitor boss of the justice dept.
Idiot.
Barr heads the DOJ, so yeah, it has everything to do with him.poor fella doesn’t know it had nothing to do with Barr and was a Mueller team lawyer who spurned the court order
Barr is your daddy
Bill Barr’s ‘su ious’ decision to ignore a federal judge’s order has put him in major jeopardy: legal scholars
a conservative columnist for the Washington Posthighlighted the fact that Attorney Bill Barr’s refusal to turn over transcripts of phone calls between for Donald Trump’s national security advisor Michael Flynn and the Russians is not only su ious — but
puts Barr on the spot with the judge for refusing.
According to Jennifer Rubin, legal scholar Laurence Tribe said Barr may have created a major headache for himself by defying a court order.
Mimi Rocah agreed and said the refusal likely raised questions Barr may not want to answer.
“Normally when prosecutors don’t want to make something public for national security reasons, etc.,
they file a do ent under seal with the judge explaining that reasoning and requesting relief from the presumption that things should be made public,”
“The House should, as a distinct part of its pre-impeachment fact-finding, hold ‘Hearings on the Defiance of “The committee and the House don’t need Robert S. Mueller III or any other Trump witness to proceed.
The result could be impeachment hearings against Trump or against Barr,” she continued.
“If allowed to continue this conduct, the Trump administration will do permanent and serious damage to the Cons ution.
For this alone, impeachment and removal may be required.
”Court Orders and Refusal to Produce Mandated Production of Witness and Do ents and Subpoenas’.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/bil...8460&list_id=1
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Huber
Reply With Quote
