Reply With Quote
Facts. Young prospects won't change what this team is at it's core.
Spurs are first round fodder until proven otherwise. We're lead by 2 chokers, it is what it is.
Facts. Young prospects won't change what this team is at it's core.
^^^ which is why it’s probably best for the organization to trade for best draft picks & develop them. The draft picks turning into non-chokers is far more likely to happen than DDR/LMA stop being chokers
Yet you like Kawhi and he choked just as much as anybody when he was here but you and your ilk was use every excuse to justify him choking in 2015 and 2016.
Good news
News that I can fap to. Thanks.
I thought that was odd too that there was no news of DeMar going to team USA this summer
Lakers are shopping the 4th Pick for an established player. DeRozan for 4th Pick if it means getting LA AD?
Plus getting AD means Fa wouldn’t be a big deal for LA so working a DeRozan trade now (since he wouldn’t be going to LA makes it easier)
Word is the Lakers/Pelicans are canvassing the league looking for "a high level player" for the Lakers' 4th pick, to add to Ingram and Ball.
It's a longshot obviously, but the Spurs should be offering either Aldridge or DeRozan. Despite his age, the former might actually be more appealing. He's not only better, but on a team trying to be compe ive, with a Ball-Holiday-Ingram-Williamson core, he'd fit much better too. Worth a shot.
I'd trade DDR for the #4 pick without question.
I would trade DDR to the lakers for Brandon Ingram and next year's 1st
Problem is you can't trade DDR until July 1
, I hope we get rid of Demar. Plus he's a Cali guy so it would be a good place for him in LA.
o Kawhi Hunter.. I mean De’Andre Hunter
Or would DD be doing to the Pelicans?? Cuz that would probably push him over the edge.
Not a problem at all - deal agreed upon now the consummated July 1
In this situation #4 to SA, AD to LA & DeRozan, Ingram, Lonzo and whatever to NO
Damn, I'd feel for DD in this scenario.
Would you trade DDR for Batum? Batum owed 25M them 27M player option. Spurs have shown an ability to rescue French players from Charlotte. Batum looking like garbage last year.
Again, it's obviously unlikely, but one thing that might help the Spurs is . . .
- If you're the Lakers, you're only trying to pacify the Hornets. You don't care that Aldridge/DeRozan shouldn't typically fetch the 4th pick, so long as it helps you complete the trade.
If you're the Pelicans, can you do better? Conley is probably the best player not named Davis available, but Aldridge is slightly better, DeRozan is only slightly worse and they'd have Ball/Holiday. Center is the obvious positional need. Drummond, Capela, one of Turner/Sabonis and maybe Adams/Bamba, are probably the best they could do. Turner/Bamba would be good fits and all are obviously significantly younger, but none are stars or likely to be.
Why would they want DeRozan when they'd have Ball-Holiday-Ingram 1-3 and Williamson at the 4 (Ingram can't play full time 4, but even if you wanted to pretend, that's out).
Shipping out Aldridge while keeping Derozan makes zero sense for the team tbh.
More like AD and DDR to the Lakers, Ingram/Kuzma to SA, Ball, Ingram/kuz, Hart and #4 to NOLA
LA seemingly wants a player, not 4th
LA seemingly wants a player, not 4th & the rest doesn’t make sense
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions