Reply With Quote
And you’re en led to that’s opinion. But the clerks job isn’t to decide policy. That’s up to the legislature and governor. If you had a job and refused to do what your boss says because of your political opinions you’d be rightfully canned.
I believe privileges of citizens of the country belong to citizens of the country. Plenty of modes of transportation for non-citizens.
And you’re en led to that’s opinion. But the clerks job isn’t to decide policy. That’s up to the legislature and governor. If you had a job and refused to do what your boss says because of your political opinions you’d be rightfully canned.
it's sad because you don't give a about selling out this country.
By issuing drivers licenses?
yes! give an inch and they'll take more than welfare. illegals aren't citizens and shouldn't have any rights whatsoever except the right to gtfo of the USA.By issuing drivers licenses?
Philo
Following the law bad now
You're wrong about that.
They have the right to apply for asylum under current US law.
Do you think Trump should follow the law?
i think trump should push as hard as he can to wipe asylum out of law.
btw, you're conflating issues... asylum seekers who get granted asylum do have rights, right? i don't think they should be here but rn that's another issue. we were talking about straight up illegals, right? right...
Last edited by koriwhat; 06-20-2019 at 06:19 PM.
What part of "illegals" did you not understand
Philo
Yep.
Migrants have the right to apply for asylum under US law regardless of their manner of entry.
I can link the relevant section of the US Code again, if you like.
What part of "illegals" did you not understand
Philo
we're talking about illegals, not asylum seekers WH... get with it already and stop running in circles over nothing. both shouldn't be allowed here imo but whatever.
nah he understood it but you keep conflating issues. asylum seekers vs straight up illegals.
He does the troll thing poor fella.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158(1) In general
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this le.
indeed. that's what all the good little marxists are today; internet trolls.
I just backed up my claim, can you?
so are these none asylum seekers trying to get a drivers license or are they now seeking asylum by trying to get a drivers license?
I cited chapter and verse from the US Code for what I said.
Where's your legal support?
You just said "illegals" can't apply for asylum. That's clearly wrong.
The driver's license business varies by state, it's not a federal issue, like asylum.
no i said illegals can't apply for a DL and that i don't believe asylum should be a law any further moving forward. conflate some more if you must.
Current US law doesn't care about your feelings, and apparently neither did the previous GOP majority-led US Congress.
You got some feelz, I'll give you that.
And at least you'll respond, unlike cowardly Chris, who lobs BS and runs away from direct replies.
oh i get that and am not oblivious to it.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions