Reply With Quote
Just wait and see, apologist . . . as usual, I'll be proven right in due time.
Little needs crank to do the damn deed.
That only lasts so long. He should have been a musician. Or actor.
Just wait and see, apologist . . . as usual, I'll be proven right in due time.
You didn't answer the question.
But Little won't, because of that half inch of standing reach?
Read or scroll tbh.
You must be a real delight to be around in person.
who knows what he's ever been right about.
who the wants anything we got?
We’re keeping Eubanks my dude. This Ben Moore whoever he is is out
Some team would take Bert with what he showed last year, his youth and his size. Dallas Indy Boston Utah Denver etc a team who likes foreigners/whites.who the wants anything we got?
Also Belinelli being a shooter will likely have interest from some teams. Milwaukee for instance
I think the things little struggled with: consistent deep shooting and hoops IQ are two areas Spurs could help him improve on... Also his lateral quickness on defense was not impressive to me... But he could rebound and block shots for his size as a springy athlete he has defensive upside more so as Team defender than a lock down one imho.
Absolutely and so will the league. He's 6'6'' 224, with a 7'1.25'' wingspan. He's "SF" sized, but his skillset is more so small ball "PF".
This is a league where comparable players like Kidd-Gilchrist, Hollis-Jefferson and Stanley Johnson, now mostly play small ball "PF". The first 2 even moonlighted as small ball "C's" at times.
If Spurs can't unlock his potential... Who else could?!
I think the things little struggled with : cocaine.
I’ve a feeling either Forbes or Bertans will be dealt
To assorted people saying they're sure we keep Eubanks. The FO had a choice to make last year, just before the playoffs: We needed a 3ed big for minute eating in blowouts - we knew if he was getting real minutes in the playoffs we were F'ed... The Spurs could have improved Eubanks' contract to the vet min and gone with him. Instead they brought in Motiejunas. This after taking a good long look at Eubanks with the main team - he was up for 23 games. The Spurs have never been shy about making a path for players they like. They didn't think he was good enough for garbage minutes 3 months ago. What makes you think this has changed?
MoSpur, any rumblings on players who are on the trade block?
There's absolutely no way that Forbes gets dealt after his performance in the last game against the Nuggets.
Interesting to see if he starts or rots on the bench behind white,dj,mills etc
Just taking my cue from the fact the Spurs are loading up again on two-guards with a three-point shot (Weatherspoon, Kenny Williams). Bryn is on a contract year and he's bound to outplay his contract.
Bertans is currently seeking more playing time. Probably won't get it, and the arrival of Samanic won't help either.
Weatherspoon and Williams are not making the team unless they look like stars.
Good thread. Most of the FA talk around here doesn't even consider it.
The Spurs have an oversupply of G's. The problem is none of them except DDR have a big enough contract to offset the salary of a good player in a trade. The only guys who are expendable, and have enough salary to matter are Belli and Bertans. So if we see a trade, it pretty much has to be a 2-for-1 swap with Belli or Bertans + one of the young G's to sweeten the deal. That opens a roster spot to accomodate whoever they sign with the MLE.
If they don't make a 2-for-1 trade, they either have to stand pat or just dump somebody. Or stand pat.
Stars where? Summer league? Preseason? Forbes didn't look like a star lmao and he still made the team. Not sure which team you've been watching the past few years
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions