So you are incapable of explaining yourself.
Got it
Thanks.
No, you can’t only assume, but you did. Swing and miss, per the usual bads.
I was pretty clear in my commentary, if you need an adult to parse it for you, go find one.
Last edited by ElNono; 07-14-2019 at 05:43 PM. Reason: Typo
So you are incapable of explaining yourself.
Got it
Thanks.
Guess we know where that leaves you.
Notice how nobody else needed any explanation. Clearly this is your problem, not anybody else’s.
My time is better spent discussing topics with people that think for themselves, tbh, you certainly don’t fit that criteria.
Now go do your bot thing, scavenge your mailing list to repeat fake news somebody else is telling you to post...![]()
How much do you think he gets paid?![]()
All the members of Congress are American citizens.
Guess we know where that leaves them.
Seems important and totally necessary.
Should be mandatory.
The Koran too.
Also whatever Satan recommends.
You down for that?
Religion good!
Hopefully he does monetize it, tbh, would be sad and pathetic otherwise, IMO...
US getting closer to 'safe third country' agreement with Guatemala
Migrants would have to seek asylum there first
https://www.localnews8.com/news/poli...ala/1094510855
tee hee
Trump’s lying lawyers are doing permanent damage to the Justice Department
The Solicitor General of the United States has a unique relationship with the Supreme Court.
Unlike other lawyers, the solicitor general routinely makes unproven claims about what the government knows and how the government is constrained, and the court typically trusts these claims.
This relationship of trust grew over many decades, and
it is the product of the rigorous process the solicitor general’s office uses to vet such claims with the relevant agencies to ensure that they are telling the truth.
Simply put,
the Supreme Court trusts the solicitor general’s office
because that office spend a very long time demonstrating its credibility.
current Solicitor General Noel Francisco strained his special relationship with the justices to the point where it was starting to fray.
In a 2018 argument, a frustrated Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Francisco, “How many times this term already have you flipped positions from prior administrations?”
this administration abandoned views that the Justice Department held for many years.
Often, it did so in ways that undercut the ins utional interests of the United States, while benefiting the Republican Party.
The answer to Sotomayor’s question, according to Georgetown law professor Marty Lederman, is at least a dozen times.
it’s probably significant that Francisco couches these assertions in language such as “according to DoD.”
Having been caught once asserting that a deadline exists that the administration later disavowed,
Francisco likely wants to, in Lederman’s words, give himself some “wiggle room.”
the word of this administration means approximately nothing after the census case.
this Supreme Court is still dominated by Republicans, so it remains fairly likely that they will rule in favor of Trump on the schedule Francisco demanded in the Sierra Club case.
Noel Francisco will no longer be solicitor general.
Nevertheless the cloud of partisanship Francisco raised over his office will remain.
The Supreme Court now knows that
the solicitor general’s office can be captured by partisans
who are not reliable custodians of the special relationship that office built with the justices over many decades.
https://thinkprogress.org/trumps-lyi...-fd6ae9c692c1/
Just another sinister, non-public way Trash and the Repugs are crapifying America.
melting down over women
Also freedom of speech bad now.
truth.
Gorka always keeps it real.
Why'd he get fired?
AmeriKKKa's white MALE supremacy (aka racism, xenophobia, misogyny, lessness) is not unique to USA
A web of abuse: How the far right disproportionately targets female politicians
Abuse of female politicians is rife online - and much of it is being directed by established far-right groups and figures,
Female politicians across Europe have been targeted with threatening and misogynist content.
On both mainstream and fringe social media platforms, analysis of selected profiles found women in politics faced frequent comments targeting their gender, race and physical appearance.
the abuse aimed at female MPs exceeds that directed at their male counterparts, and differed in its focus and content.
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-48871400
"The purpose of these courses is to focus on the historical impact and literary style from texts of the Old Testament and/or New Testament era, including the Hebrew Scriptures to teach students knowledge of biblical content, characters, poetry and narratives that are prerequisites to understanding contemporary society and culture, including literature, art, music, mores, oratory and public policy...."
https://education.ky.gov/curriculum/...the_bible.aspx
Lol elective poetry class.
Hopefully they teach the laws of Leviticus and Deuteronomy
His wife laid the law down early on even before he busted Clinton's ass wide open:::"You hit him, he's going to hit back 10x harder."
That's rule #1.
Rule #2? Obey all rules.
No free shots, Isit.
Nobody does wet work like---45---
Can't say I've ever clicked on a single one of those.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)