Jesus, TSA.
Just how big is your ing conspiracy that includes this entire indictment's being a fake just to provide cover for Seth Rich's murderers?
Seriously think about what you're saying for once.
Hater is flat out wrong on so many things it’s astonishing.
Not a loon.
Just astoundingly wrong and has absolutely no shame in being consistently dead wrong.
If he had an ounce of self-awareness, he would cut all his fingers off so as not to make a fool of himself.
Jesus, TSA.
Just how big is your ing conspiracy that includes this entire indictment's being a fake just to provide cover for Seth Rich's murderers?
Seriously think about what you're saying for once.
talkin to a guy who thought clinton was managing a child sex shop in a pizzeria basement
Today's chump
Sperm shielding so hard for your hag.
You sure it's not a matter?
you're just mad because i don't give a about you you ing loser. this is hilarious! go be the ass you're supposed to be and have a in' friday!
Do ents Reveal that RAT ERS Jerome Corsi, Roger Stone Knew Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory Was False Before Promoting It
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...cy-theory.html
None of the emails quoted mention Russian hackers.
How can it be concluded they knew it was Russian hackers?
Good luck getting an answer
Snowflake imagination is greater than 4 year olds![]()
Still no evidence
2 years in
Snowflakes![]()
Blake Zero triggered.
Laughter triggered in me.
Riotous laughter.
derp will never talk about the topic.
Your post didn't talk about the topic let alone adequately speak to the quote.
Compulsive psychopav talking points.
Who is Ratner's reported source according the court do ent, derp?
Let's discuss the topic.
Pop quiz.
You didn't answer the question.
You aren't discussing the topic.
You are only here for other men.
lol derp
You make a point on topic, others decide if they want to reply.
That's how it works, psychopav.
Seriously, if you knew the answer to that simple quest you'd know why I am mocking TSA.
Give it a try.
Let's talk about the topic.
I did.
Ratner's purported source make the whole thing ridiculous.
That's the whole point.
Let's talk about that.
Wikileaks?
You're free to look it up. We can discuss it. This isn't difficult. Just read.
You're free to make clear intelligible points and not be a triggered snowflake; but you don't. Par.
I made my point very clear. Anyone with even the slightest interest in the topic would know that.
You're only here to post about me.
You proved that.
Again.
Par.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)