Reply With Quote
New York has literally nobody to make a DeRozan trade work.
From Chicago I would be cool with trading for Porter jr.
If he opts out of his contract we’ll lose him for nothing.
New York has literally nobody to make a DeRozan trade work.
From Chicago I would be cool with trading for Porter jr.
These trades are ridiculous, DeRozan is a top 15 player in the league. Trading him to fill a hole only creates another one unless you are doing a trade that's going to bring back a player of his caliber and another quality player. What the Spurs need is another established player regardless of position to play along with DeRozan and Aldridge. One of them has a bad game it's difficult for the Spurs to win. If they are going to make a trade should be for someone to add to the starting line up. Mills, Forbes, KJ, 2020 1st or some similar combination should be enough to get a quality player.
Would be hilarious if knicks trade for derozan and include Marcus morris in the trade lmao... ps I know morris can’t be traded before someone corrects me
I love White. I love Murray. I love Lonnie. I don’t want to trade any of them. But if you can get a guaranteed all star that is still young for one of them, you have to do it. At best White becomes Beal. At best. If you can guarantee that? Yeah, you do it.
Murray
White
Walker
Porter jr
Aldridge
Why "at best"? Beal doesn't have White's all-NBA level defense, tbh.
Also, the idea would be adding another all-star to the guy you believe can become one. If you trade your up and coming all-star for an already established one, you are still an all-star short. Sure, the idea is that one of Murray or Walker can become that. The thing is I don't believe in them as much as I believe in White. That's why I would never do a White trade and I might consider a Murray one (for sure) and even maybe a Walker one (it would have to be a no brainer deal though).
Why didn't they trade him for Westbrook than? this makes no sense. Unless they are after a Wizards package with Beal included.
ok,
Because Westbrook is an overpaid bag who can't play out of any system beside his own.
That's why.
No, he isn't. Not even close.
Trading DeRozan wouldn't create any hole. DeRozan is a guard, in that position we are covered for years to come with White, Murray, Walker, Forbes and maybe even Johnson and Weatherspoon.Trading him to fill a hole only creates another one unless you are doing a trade that's going to bring back a player of his caliber and another quality player. What the Spurs need is another established player regardless of position to play along with DeRozan and Aldridge. One of them has a bad game it's difficult for the Spurs to win. If they are going to make a trade should be for someone to add to the starting line up. Mills, Forbes, KJ, 2020 1st or some similar combination should be enough to get a quality player.
Would luv LAURI MARKKANEN! But I think coach Casey makes a hard push to reunite!The New York Knicks, Chicago Bulls and Detroit Pistons have all inquired about DeMar DeRozan via trade. Trade talks have picked up last couple days.
Sure Pistons. Give us Doumbouya and we'll give you DeRozan.
Kidding aside, I wouldn't be against a Pistons trade involving Snell, Maker, some young prospecto and draft picks.
DeMar for Batum straight up works. Spurfan longtime dream can finally come to fruition
I’m so down to trade him lol I like DeMar a lot but I’d rather see Murray, white, and Lonnie get the minutes if we can get some value back. But are FA signings make zero sense if we trad DeMar unless we’re getting back a borderline all star
I wonder WTF is wrong with people so much nowadays...
The Spurs aren't trading DeRozan. You don't have to move everyone just because they are (or rather might be) expiring. You can let guys go or keep your options open. At what point do you no longer care if a guy walks? They didn't "get something" for Anderson or Parker. There's a very good chance they don't even try to "get something" for Aldridge. Guys can walk for nothing. It's okay. The whole point of DeRozan was to bridge the previous and future eras. He's doing that job well. He wasn't brought in to be a mainstay for a decade. He can play out this year and potentially next, and then the two sides can part ways feeling like they both got what they wanted.
It's definitely not easy to see how the Spurs will get better next year unless their guards take an unrealistic jump and the team gets actual value in a deal. If they wanted to trade him for a pick, it would have been during the draft when they knew what they'd be getting. Almost no other trade makes any sense. Some of the deals proposed here are just miserable.
Rozan for Blake Griffin
Murray Lonnie D white Blake La not bad
KD,Nephew,Giannis,LBJ,Curry,Harden,PG13,AD,Jokic,E mbiid,Lillard,Butler,Klay,Beal,Oladipo.
Next tier of slightly more/equal/slightly lesser value to DeRozan in no order.
Westbrook,Kemba,Kyrie,Doncic,J.Murray,Griffin,Russ ell,LMA,Middleton,Towns,J.Holiday,Simmons,Harris,M cCollum,Siakam,Mitc ,Gobert,Horford.
Isn't DeRozan closer to value to the second group?
Y’all don’t think the spurs are dumb enough to do Chris Paul for DeMar do you? Lol
Detroit hypothetically would be trading for DeRozan to pair with Blake...
Zero chance.
I'd rather have a proven than a maybe. Spurs already have to many maybes. Last time we seen Murray he was playing 20 minutes a game and had no offense, Walker hasn't shown anything other than he can chunk shots in the summer league. Doubtful Forbes gets whole lot better.
derozans a proven what? mentally weak pussy who is 30 and still can’t shoot 3s. that empty stats loser and his idiot “fans”
A proven, what, inefficient high usage player? Yeah, no. I would rather have all the maybes in the World over that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions