AOC choose the democratic, non-violent route. Good for her.
AOC choose the democratic, non-violent route. Good for her.
This is a troll post.
Went over your head, tbh. Your lack of self-awareness is amusing.
Also, your ethical flexibility.
This is a troll post.
Nope. I might not agree one bit with her rhetoric, but certainly appreciate she took the democratic approach.
The Democratic approach of deflecting and sweeping it under the rug? Is that something you identify with? At least Trump has the stones to answer every loaded question that comes his way. I see nothing but cowardice from the Left.
The democratic approach of gaining a wider voice through the popular vote. You don’t have to agree with anything she says or doesn’t say, that’s her right. The opposite is the violent approach like that terrorist, shooting innocent people.
Your faux outrage is also such a used up schtick, tbh, nobody is really buying your selective partisan standards. I don’t recall you denouncing the ‘both sides’ comment from the president or the GOP in general. And plenty more situations like that.
I don’t even like AOC, or Trump, but they both have a right to say whatever they want (not really the 1st Amendment Trump likes, but it’s the one we have).
he does not
i'd love to see trump's full quote right here even though i've read it and seen him say it in video. i just want to see you post it in full and i wonder how it compares with your perception/interpretation of his words or lack thereof. IN FULL!
You need to read the thread and my post a little better kori. It’s not Trump that needs to say something, it’s the cadre of party officials that shut their mouth, which, according to some here, is de able behavior (but only clearly depending on who does it)
what i'm trying to say is it's the same ol' thing i keep hearing about that "both sides" quote but it's never said in full and when it is the left's narrative(neo-nazi/nazi/racist/white supremacy) is busted.
That’s fine. I was merely using it as an example of many out there.
Ban bet?
I don't gamble.
Also: troll account so even if I did lol no
typo's galore... they meant "small minded donors".
What percentage came from people in her district?
Trump catapulted a baseless smear about Omar’s marriage from the online fringes into the political mainstream
The president told his supporters in Greenville that he’d heard Omar had married her brother,
an evidence-free claim that was first posted online in August 2016
as her political career began to take off
but has since gained traction in conservative media,
A self-identified Trump supporter going by the name “AbdiJohnson”first made the claim
in a thread called “ILHAN OMAR MARRIAGE FRAUD EXPOSURE” posted on the Somali Spot online forum
The thread has since been deleted from the forum
The user, who was a notorious troll on the site, never showed any evidence of his claim
Scott Johnson from posting about the unsubstantiated rumor on his Power Line blog,
he admits that his claims are based mostly on the Somali Spot post, as well as unspecified “social media evidence” and his own su ions that she’s “hiding something.”
PJMedia blogger David Steinberg started writing a series of posts claiming Omar and Elmi have the same father that rely entirely on unnamed sources.
Anti-Muslim activist Laura Loomer,
bumbling conservative operative Jacob Wohl
and Twitter user Ali Alexander
went to Minnesota earlier this year to investigatethe claims,
but all they turned up were social media posts that had already been reported.
the smear has been pushed all summer by high-profile conservatives such as Dinesh D’Souza and Rush Limbaugh,
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/07/tru...al-mainstream/
next up: Omar eats pizza with "meat" from live abortions. You heard here first.
White Male Supremacists' are scared less, balls and penises retracting, anuses oscillating, of smart, braver women, of any color.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)