Reply With Quote
it's as if they're banking on the majority of us not understanding why there's an EC in the first place. these communists!
not all... but let's not pretend like a republican pov is accepted across social media without harsh scrutiny, bans, shadowbans, doxxing, etc... lives have been ruined for simply not bowing down to communism, i mean the liberal disease.
it's as if they're banking on the majority of us not understanding why there's an EC in the first place. these communists!
"outright discrimination"
No one is forcing people to post stupid .
Actions have consequences. Sorry.
Why is there an EC in the first place?
to a degree...
well i was under the impression to bring a more level playing field to our pres elections. don't want NY and CA to solely dictate policy and who gets in office.
So we got:
a.) abolish the electoral college
b.) $15/hr minimum wage
c.) elimination of private health insurance companies
d.) All public colleges and universities should be tuition free (free brainwashing)
e.) No more cash bail; no more private prisons
f.) effectively ending mass incarceration ("I'm gonna let all your family members that are in prison off the hook! Feel the Bern!")
g.) federal ban on assault weapons and instant backround checks; "taking on the NRA" (whatever that means)
h.) Bernie wants to put criminals to work (slave labor) rebuilding our infrastructure instead of doing hard time for their crimes. I'm sure none of them will try to escape.
i.) "Income inequality" (Bernie is going to take from the rich and give to the poor - a modern day Robin Hood!)
j.) Medicare for all (free !)
That's probably only half of his radical policies.
Point of clarification:well then you're blind.
Is it cool to call AAs monkeys if they "really do look like monkeys"?
Monkey sounds and dangled/thrown bananas, also cool?
How often does that happen to "white" soccer players/public figures, who are also 100% simian?
now you're playing the "what if" game with me... truthfully, did you think jarret was black at all when you first saw her photo or did you see her photo after the fact?
she looks exactly like that lead actress. ok, maybe not exactly but 90% at least.
100%? not even jarret is 100% black. lol
and us whites get it bad enough in movies, tv, etc... and now in politics and the culture at large if you haven't noticed. it's so bad some are looking for their spines as they weep from white guilt.
It was bad for Trump. The Roseanne show was extremely popular and drawing high ratings. Roseanne's character was highly supportive of Trump. That had to be shut down.
You should look up the word simian, for starters.
I'm sure all the light complected AAs will be thrilled to know that they no longer count as black if they can manage to pass for white without anyone finding out about their AA heritage, not that Valerie Jarrett was hiding hers in the least.
Seems fair, hide or disavow your heritage, then be accorded the privilege and respect your white peers acquire by the simple fact of surviving birth.
i read over your last post without really thinking it over i suppose; like not questioning if "white" meant light-complected black american.
i thought you were asking at first if it's ok to call white people monkey's if they look like monkey's.
still, jarret looks just like that lead actress no matter how far down the hole we go.
I knew Valerie Jarrett was AA before I ever saw her picture, because I followed Obama's candidacy.
No matter how far we go down the rabbit hole, comparing white folks to apes isn't a cultural motif, and that isn't what happened with Valerie Jarrett.
Comparing black folks to apes OTOH, has a long racist pedigree.
with that said, there's been no white-complected black dude/chick that i've seen that i said looks like a caucasian person. not even blake griffin strikes me as purely white. jarret looks like a straight up arab and a lead in tPoTa.
Arabs are white now?
never said that. jarret doesn't look white nor black to me. she looks arab. i said what i said so why twist it?
shouldn't the level playing field be with respect to the individual voters, though? why should a voter have more or less say based on what state they happen to reside in? how is it a level playing field if your vote effectively doesn't count in presidential elections if you live in alabama, mississippi, or california, but suddenly matter oh so much if you live in florida or ohio? shouldn't each citizen have an equal say?
Why are you asking me? Ask our forefathers. Thank god they figured this all out to begin with.
we've amended their mistakes many times. they were brilliant men but not infallible. i'm just asking for your opinion, since you said it was to bring a level playing fieldWhy are you asking me? Ask our forefathers. Thank god they figured this all out to begin with.
It's true, our forefathers didn't want the State of California deciding Presidential elections.
Thank god they had det slavery thing all figured out and half a million Americans didn't die in a civil war over it or something. Super genius gods, they were....
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
