There it is.
That last chick almost got Mueller to say one of the cons ution to remove the president for his vile acts is..impeachment.
There it is.
He'll be impeached, he just won't be convicted. & that's MORE than enough for (them). Pelosi will wait for the # to cross the threshold then do it.
That "almost" is how we got to here today. Clinton couldn't hold the gaffe & he caught her twixt MN. & NY.,---blasted hair all over them walls.
"They won’t because they know the Senate will never convict. This hearing doesn’t change anything."
it won't change that McConnell's Senate will NEVER convict a Repug President
but that's not an obstacle to impeachment (only an obstacle to conviction and removal)
Impeach Trump. But don’t necessarily try him in the Senate.
It is possible to argue that impeaching President Trump and removing him from office before the 2020 election would be unwise, even if
he did cheat his way into office, and even if
he is abusing the powers of that office to enrich himself,
cover up his crimes and
leave our national security vulnerable to repeated foreign attacks. an assumption that impeachment by the House and trial in the Senate are analogous to indictment by a grand jury and trial by a pe jury:
Just as a prosecutor might hesitate to ask a grand jury to indict even an obviously guilty defendant if it appeared that no jury is likely to convict,
so, it is said, the House of Representatives might properly decline to impeach even an obviously guilty president — and would be wise to do so — if it appeared the Senate was dead-set against convicting him.
the House, unlike any grand jury, can conduct an impeachment inquiry that ends with a verdict
and not just a referral to the Senate for trial —
an inquiry in which the target is afforded an opportunity to participate and mount a full defense.
It seems fair to surmise, then, that an impeachment inquiry conducted with ample opportunity for the accused to defend himself before a vote by the full House would be at least substantially protected,
even if not entirely bullet-proofed, against a Senate whitewash.
embodying its conclusions of criminality or other grave wrongdoing in a condemnatory “Sense of the House” resolution far stronger than a mere censure.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/impeach-trump-but-dont-necessarily-try-him-in-the-senate/2019/06/05/22d83672-87bc-11e9-a870-b9c411dc4312_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cc 6c9b5bb791
But Pelosi/Dems won't do it, they don't have the guts to really go after Trash
The weakness, corruption of the Dems as a countervailing power to the destructive, scorche-earth, fascist, racist Repugs is yet another reason why
America is ed and un able
Last edited by boutons_deux; 07-24-2019 at 11:45 AM.
Why, why won't Pelosi, recky? Seriously.
sure
because the traitors never used politics/twisted narratives/lies/conspiracy theories
to get away with impeachable/illegal crimes
sure
only the dems are held to scrutiny for playing politics
the gop pretty much sold out the country to protect a criminal
fox news became a russian propaganda channel exclusively featuring the gop traitors
which is the biggest reason why the dems/house has to even play these games
so you basically are joining team gop
She never wanted to impeach Trump. They're in bed together. That's why Trump is always praising and bending over for her.
The second reason is that it's too late for such thing. I wanted impeachment too....like 2 years ago. Today, not so much.
"By trying to run a trial through the press all you’re doing is feeding into the witch hunt narrative."
goddamn, you're ing stupid
Congressional hearings aren't "trial through the press", and are proving that there was not, is not any witch hunt, but REAL Trash crimes of (at least) obstruction
You dont want impeachment today because you realize trump is actually a very good president!
Why is there a second hearing?
Not enough yes or no answers?
I've sensed the exact same thing, recky. Like you said, the trail is plain to see. Outstanding ferreting there, youngster. I'm jealous for not saying it first.
Schiff killing it
Not to belabor your assertion, recky, but, why, why are they "in bed together?" What's the back story? I find it fascinating you've stated this in broad daylight. It's made my morning.
Disloyalty to country
traitors!
He's had a hard-on for the old man since election night. He thought he was gonna be big man on campus finally. Instead, he's still Dem fart catcher & latrine queen.
He's just, well we're all just damn lucky the economy is balls to the walls, otherwise, there'd be no time for this, nor, the holers from down south of the border(s).
You didn't give 2 s for this country till he whooped her ass, ya big baby, you.
Pelosi and Trash aren't in bed
Pelosi/Dems are passive accomplices
Pelosi's political, or whatever, calculation that impeachment would be "divisive" is bull , as are the rest of her reasons for no impeachment, and are her snarkiness, condescension towards The Squad and other progressives.
As Queen of the authoritarian Dem self-protecting establishment, she will never rock any boats
Again, when you try & steal something from an American that he has attained you're not gonna get away with it without a knock down/drag out. Can be a job, a relationship, a Presidency, on & on. The victim will hesitate, about a minute, then grab back with everything he's got. That's what the old man did. "They ain't taking this, no in' way."
"Oh, I come from old country, I not see why you fight all the time. Just walk away, please, we go back to New York. Okay?" - Mel
"Get the outta the way." - the old man...turns and the kids are there, the 2 boys & the linked SIL...the girl too. She ain't too sure, but, it's blood, pure & simple.
"Let us proceed..."
go yourself
it isnt something that relies on party you piece of
except for this traitorous cult
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)