Reply With Quote
That was part of your meltdown.For calling you out for being a ?
I can see you've been properly programmed.
That was part of your meltdown.For calling you out for being a ?
Qhrisbot initiate projection.exe
Show me the lie.
Back up your assertions first.
1.) "He betrayed the country working with the Russians."
2.)"He's descriminated against people of color for decades." (Should be easy to name a few things here)
3.) "He loves the KKK"
After that, I will show you the lies.
Former Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said that Democrats "have to be disappointed" with his testimony while ABC's Terry Moran dismissed any potential for impeachment proceedings.
"Impeachment's over," he said. "I don't think Nancy Pelosi is going to stand for her members bringing forth something that is going to obviously lose in the Senate, lose with the American public."
FH - I ain't gotta prove . Everything I said is already out there. YOU prove me wrong. Then we can proceed son.
I expected you to fold, but not this quicklyF
“For the KKK, Clinton is our choice,” said Will Quigg
source - vocativ
The wall-Clinton-and-many-Democrats-wanted-wall before Trump beat Clinton to get the White House.
Hope that helps!
The Most Revealing Exchange of the Mueller Hearing
A Democrat asked the former special counsel whether the president had met each of the three elements necessary to prove obstruction of justice. Mueller’s answers spoke volumes.
As Mueller explains in the report, a charge of obstruction of justice requires three elements:
an obstructive act,
a nexus with an official proceeding, and
corrupt intent.
And in the report, Mueller’s team laid out several cases where President Donald Trump committed an obstructive act,
in connection with an official proceeding,
with what Mueller’s team concluded could be a corrupt intent.
the point was made:
Mueller himself had acknowledged all the ways that Trump’s behavior met all three prongs of the test for obstruction of justice.
Under questioning from Lieu, Mueller also seemed to imply that he would have indicted Trump if not for Justice Department rules.
“I’d like to ask you the reason, again, that you did not indict Donald Trump is because of OLC opinion stating that you cannot indict a sitting president, correct?” Lieu asked.
“That is correct,” Mueller said—an answer that seemed to contradict the reasoning laid out in the report itself.
“That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.”
the special counsel had his reasons for not charging Trump,
but that doesn’t mean anyone who’s not a Justice Department official is obliged to stick to the same guidelines—
especially when the evidence of obstruction is plain.
“Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?” Buck asked.
“Yes,” Mueller said.
“You believe that he committed—you could charge the president of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?”
“Yes,” Mueller said.
This time, he had no clarification to offer.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...BWa49wreHIw2t0
Dems got Mueller to on all the Russian piss in Trash's lonely bed
That's me folding?I expected you to fold, but not this quickly
If you can't back up your own takes, no one will.That's me folding?
As far as the Russian things goes, it's all horse . If they were meddling back since '14 then that's on Hussein Obama. Never heard a word about it till AFTER he'd whooped her ass THEN it was of import. Nobody said a word about '18 because "you" won. Now, according to Mule the Russians are coming, the Russians are coming & are back at it again for '20. It's all nonsense surrounded by sour grapes and prepping an election battle field. No one can take a loss whether it's Little League, pro sports, et al & etc.
& he does not love white supremacists. He said there were fine people on both sides at that protest. And there were. That's just common sense.
lol -1000 points for fake news son
I'm disappointed in you man. SMH
'I'M NOT GOING TO ANSWER THAT': Mueller Dodges Direct Questions 123 Times
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ons-123-times/
lol -1000 points for fake news son
& it saddens me as well because I would never allow these political differences to change our shared concern & support for the Lakers & other sports on these pages, LF. I think absolutely no different of you because you're against Trump.
Anti-Trump Harvard Law prof Laurence Tribe calls Mueller hearing ‘disaster’ that helped the president
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
