Reply With Quote
She's on the record.
You aren't.
So you must be for it.
She has official votes on record to make the specific practice a crime.
That's why it's a stupid question.
Of course, you knew all about that. You just jumped on the twitter outrage wagon again.
She's on the record.
You aren't.
So you must be for it.
It's ok when she does it:
It's ok when she does it:
she was specifically responding to someone saying that racist to her.
two wrongs don't make it right, amirite?
Just when you think Chris, etc, can't be dumber, they go dumberer
what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
I have yet to hear Trump denounce white iden y extremism.
The future the Dems will deliver is already happening in other countries.
Canada?
estonia
and that wasn't a field trip. it was the opening of some art exhibit on a saturday. that woman showed up in a protest. of course Nathan will have you believe that the indecent exposure was part of some planned, school sponsored/supported itinerary
https://translate.googleusercontent....pfO0mEIwtXazcw
woman shows up at an art exhibit and undresses = OMG LEFTISM IS TAKING OVER IN OTHER COUNTRIES
Why does every conservative outrage rely on either exaggeration or outright misinformation?
Get the in here and own your lie, liar.
Get the in here and own your lie, liar.
rt =/= endorsement
Because it sticks.
Also, because factual refutation tends to reinforce rather than dispel it in the minds of those already inclined to believe it.
Propaganda works.
Well she's the goose then... circa 2012
^^^ Chris with no own take.
Pure megaphone for propaganda.
I like to insert facts in to the conversation and live the sewing circle stuff to you.
yep, your takes are mostly predigested.
magpie Chris strikes again.
^there you go
Yep, you got nothin
Starting to get interesting.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions