You're a lawyer. Do you really think there's a strong case there?
im not a seasoned federal prosecutor.
with that said, i've read vol 2 of the mueller report and yes, there does appear to be a strong case. the problem is the jury in this case would be the senate, and you can bet your ass it would be a party line vote, because party > integrity. just look at graham's 180 since the primaries
Impeachment is a political process. Crimes don't have to be established beyond a reasonable doubt or even in accord with any judicial standard beyond those self-imposed.
oh, so he was never guilty of a crime to have obstructed either
now answer the second part
To answer your second question -- No.
But, good luck with that.
The cover up and executive interference in investigation were the impeachable conduct.This ain't Watergate, folks.
How is this different?
great. so obstruction is obstruction.
What is Trump covering up?
he sought and acted to impede an investigation. if he's innocent of the underlying crime, then he's an idiot (and still a criminal) for attempting to do so
How do you know scorched earth tactics won't work?
It has worked well for the GOP, so far.
Also, the popularity of Nixon impeachment changed from start to finish. Why rule it out in advance?
when i said scorched earth wont help, i meant help trying to return congress to a more functional state. which may be a pipe dream at this point
all DJT had to do was say, I'm innocent and the investigation will prove it, and get the out of the way.
Had he done so, we probably wouldn't be having this conversation now.
^
That's a fair point
Hey spurraider,
Have you ever exonerated anyone?
This is your white flag for the day.Hey spurraider,
Have you ever exonerated anyone?
have i ever exonerated anyone of what? what are you even talking about?Hey spurraider,
Have you ever exonerated anyone?
He interfered with the investigation, that's enough.
Some republican went full re and Darrin just think it was a funny moment.
Perhaps his frustration caused him to do it, rather than a guilty conscience. Hard to see how that is exculpating in any wise, tbh.
UNLAWFULLYHey spurraider,
Have you ever exonerated anyone?
and why?
and why have Trash and his mafiya been "forgetting", lying, obstructing about Russia connections for 2 years?
Just curious what you guys think he actually DID to obstruct the investigation. Seems like all he did was think or talk about obstructing it. Shouldn't you actually have specific acts of obstruction?
CC says, hold my hand, I haven’t been paying attention.
His tweets are ridiculous and so unpresidential that it's a national embarrassment but Its not like he fired Mueller.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote