Reply With Quote
Then you wouldn't keep posting about it.i don't care how you take it.
i don't care how you take it.I'll take that as proof you can't.
Then you wouldn't keep posting about it.i don't care how you take it.
you're a broken record of invisible W's which mean nothing whatsoever to anyone but a broken down sissy like yourself pav, chump, or whatever your next handle might be. troll away troll!Then you wouldn't keep posting about it.
No one wants to talk to your condescending ass. You burned your bridges, now go sleep in the bed that you made.
lol however will he survive?
He was sued for racial discrimination for refusing to rent to black tenants and lied to black applicants about apartment availability. He also unfairly called for the death penalty of innocent black teens, the Central Park 5. That's just a two instances but enough to call a spade a spade.
What I'm saying is that I don't need to meet your weakling ass face to face. You've provided your own testimony plus pictures to confirm you're really a weakling.
I'm further saying I can call you a scrawny weakling and there's nothing you can do here but take it.
What did Castro want his followers to do with this information?
Trump’s Opponents Want to Name His Big Donors. His Supporters Say It’s Harassment.
Calling out the people who fund campaigns is not a new tactic in politics,
but the question of how much should be publicly disclosed about those donors has been an issue that Republicans,
led by the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell,
have repeatedly raised in recent years.
While the Supreme Court ruled in the 2010 Citizens United case to uphold public disclosure,
Republicans and wealthy allies like the Koch brothers have argued that it results in donor harassment and
has a chilling effect on free speech.
In a heated political environment, boycotting the businesses of big donors like Mr. Ross
has led to a new round of outrage at either end of the political spectrum.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/us/politics/castro-trump-donors.html?emc=rss&partner=rss
all these greedy, venal, inhumane Capitalist assholes, to
One Capitalist said he donates to Trash because he wants MORE tax cuts, not because he's racist.
iow, his Capitalism is 100% inhumane, as all Capitalism is.
I haven't seen a good answer to this question. His brother and several candidates said drumpf is a white nationalist and complicit in the El Paso shooting, and then post this list a couple days later.
He didn’t say he wanted his followers to do anything with it. Nothing would be the answer? That’s not a good answer?
Sorry, I’m not trading voting disclosure for phone calls.
Oh no! words
ask ducks. he doxxed a lady. ask him why.
Kochs are really concerned about Democracy.
if you think supporting trump is on the same playing field as sucker punching people...
You can't even think of a good answer to this question.
At all.
What did Castro want his followers to do with this information?
What is your answer to this question?
No. Hillary saw him coming front & center & still got cold ed.
White flag post, still no reply to a straightforward topical question.
If you refuse to play, I'm not the one who looks bad.
Does it bother you when politicians use publicly available information to fire people up?
Fetal tissue researchers get their info shared by activists to the public, even though they do not perform abortions. How is it improper for Dems to share information with the public about who gives money to politicians who promote racism and white nationalism?
Castro wanted people to know which local leaders maxed out for Trump. I expect they'll get public feedback of all kinds -- good, bad, worse and totally indifferent. It's also foreseeable that people will vote with their feet, for and against any associated businesses based on the information.
Do you think politicians are obligated to curtail their own speech, or to refrain from singling people out?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
