NYPD cop Daniel Pantaleo’s pay rises to $120G while working desk duty since killing Eric Garner
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/chokehold-salary-rises-killing-eric-garner-article-1.2789313
NYPD cop Daniel Pantaleo’s pay rises to $120G while working desk duty since killing Eric Garner
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/chokehold-salary-rises-killing-eric-garner-article-1.2789313
Crazy how comfortable we are with cops killing non violent citizens over sometime so trivial as selling cigs.
whites murdering non-whites, it's what makes America America.
Does this get full pension?
He just got fired.
Altho the Union is feigning outrage.
Just do what the cops tell you to do. Does anybody like it? No. But, you got to do it, or, chances are you end up living with Jesus full time.
No, they robbed his pension.
The pieces of .
That's a ed up bottom line, but it's Pussy Eater, so ...
selling onesies is a capital crime, punishable by death without trial?![]()
ing rightwingnutjobs, love to apply the law with brutality on non-white-non-males, while ignoring the crimes of the white-male oligarchy.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-20-2019 at 10:13 AM.
LOL.
Cheering on some 6-on-1 bully-cowards who took down a very obese guy with health problems for potentially selling loose cigarettes.
FOH.
Pussy ass should be facing manslaughter charges.
CC with the not-so subtle racist thread le plus a little dishuminazing touch on it.
If he obeys the cops directives he'd be alive today. He did it to himself.
Derrr errr errr if the 7 cops weren't such pussies he'd be alive today.
No. That ain't the way it works. The cops have the conPERIOD
Ya. Was an illegal choke hold and take down.
Aint nothing going to change that.
A choke hold ain't illegal. A take down of a suspect ain't illegal.
But, as usual, Mult, you & the others can never, ever stipulate to being wrong. It's ing maddening!
you just lost all cred guy. C'mon.
Let's see who say's it is illegal. And by that I mean quotes:
Police Commissioner James O'Neill
In reaching the decision, O'Neill said he was putting faith in the assessment of Judge Rosemarie Maldonado, a deputy police commissioner who presided over Garner's disciplinary trial.O'Neill heavily cited Maldonado's opinion in announcing the firing on Monday. In particular, he mentioned the finding that Pantaleo's use of the chokehold "was reckless and cons uted a gross deviation from the standard of conduct established for a New York City police officer."
If you want to be reasonable and talk percentages, I agree that Phat Phuck could have offered absolutely zero resistance and the demonic pigs might not have offed him. At least not there on the sidewalk.
Thank you. Christ, it was like pulling ing teeth.
I was wrongPERIOD
^ right on. Related, i do believe Ramsey Ortas accounts.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/13/1...killing-safety
So while Fatty could have perhaps spared himself, it still stands that if the 7 cops roll him and rough him up a bit, and the one major prick Pantaleno does NOT do the illegal chokehold......he is still alive.
If he obeys the police he's alive. Same with the Gentle Giant in Ferguson.
He's still alive if he submits at once to police directives. He didn't think he was going to jail that day & didn't want to go to jail that day. Not-that-day. He took it as trolling him & got belligerent & it cost him his life. Were the cops happy he resisted? Yes. But, you have to thwart them; don't give them the satisfaction= A. Don't break the law. B. When you have broken the law take your medicine.
In the end he did not want to go thru the rigmarole of being booked, set in a cell with a bunch of no accounts, having to make a call to get bailed out, on & on. It was gamble to be on that street selling cigarettes & he knew it. He just wagered he'd be lucky on that day. He lost that wager.
Great so lets assign %s.
What % are the cops responsible? Break it up into the 6 other cowards and the main coward Mr. Illegal Choke Hold.
The cops are responsible non whatsoever, Mult. They were doing their job. They're just as cognizant to the (displacement) of a common booking as the perp. He was breaking the law. AGAIN, he took a chance. Had good odds from what I can gather= A. they won't drive by. B. they'll drive by but won't stop. C. they'll warn me off and I'll walk away.
Probably one or more of the cops hadn't gotten trim the night before and was cross. "Let's take him down, ruin his weekend."
It's him, Mult, who can put a stop to itPERIOD "I ed up and gambled. I'll be there 24 hours tops, I'll bail out, the Judge will give me a rap on the knuckles if it ever comes to trial, and I'll be luckier the next time I'm out there on the wire."
No. He didn't do that because he was not prepared (((mentally))) to go into the lockup and the INCONVENIENCE that would entail.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)