Trump was a historically bad candidate, second most unpopular ever, trailing only HRC.
He got as many newspaper endorsements as he deserved on the merits. It's a sign of the degeneracy of journalism that he got any, tbh.
How and why US sanctions are killing people
Trump was a historically bad candidate, second most unpopular ever, trailing only HRC.
He got as many newspaper endorsements as he deserved on the merits. It's a sign of the degeneracy of journalism that he got any, tbh.
Last edited by Winehole23; 08-24-2019 at 04:26 PM.
Anyone, either side of the football that would base their vote on a newspaper backing is just gross, but, it actually happens.
Degeneracy of the voters too. I'll buy that.
U said Media was not in the tank for Hillary. I JUST PROVED YOU THEY WERE. Now you claim he was a terrible candidate. So what? Media was still in the tank for Hillary. Take the L and move on.
BTW about 50% of Americans disagree with you that Trump was. Terrible candidate
You exaggerate the potency of your example, hater, newspapers are so 20th century.
Newspapers are not "the media."
Why would newspapers endorse the worse candidate?
newspapers are not the media
![]()
Most people don't get their news from newsprint in 2019.
FB, Twitter, blogs, and good old fashioned TV all put newspapers in the shade. The notion that newspapers still function as gatekeepers is quaint.
You went from "media was not in the tank for Hillary" to "well Trump was terrible anyway" to "newspapers are not media".
You embarrassing yourself ma nig![]()
muh media conspiracies
Lol hater
He did nail that Winester rump to the barn door there, buddy-boy. Gotcha!
Are you in favor of sanctioning Venezuela and doing regime change because you believe what your government and CNN tells you? Be honest.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)