How do you feel about guns laws in Texas?

[Pavlov]

Nope. He want to get rid of semi automatic weapons but not all of them. He won't give his criteria for which ones.

THE STALLING

Haven't made one. I've said I think you should be making the case to change or eliminate the 2nd amendment since it's original intent no longer applies. And I've said that anti gunners could make a more cogent argument if they knew a bit more about guns. Which would only require spending a short time on youtube watching some videos.

Or you could, you know, just say what you think people should know.

But you never will. You don't want any discussion.

[Pavlov]

As long as you consider gun owners schmucks, you'll be on the losing side. Trust me on this.

What about the rest of it?

[KenMcCoy]

b) i'm sure there will be people who break the law. i'm also sure that many will be good law abiding citizens and not murder innocent people with guns, knives, blunt objects, cars, etc.

FIFY

[SnakeBoy]

I'd totally not feel threatened with that guy carrying that into a Walmart for his own protection as is his second Amendment right

What about a guy carrying this into walmart



Less threatening than the 10/22?

[DMC]

^^Chumpy is on here 24 hours a day. I posted this morning, he responded in seconds. I posted at noon, he responded again in seconds. Now he's still going.

Want to stop mass shootings, have the shooter correspond with Chumpy. He'll be to busy "yes I am" "No you're not" "Yes I am" "prove it" "no you prove it" for days on end to do anything.

[spurraider21]

As long as you consider gun owners schmucks, you'll be on the losing side. Trust me on this.

i dont consider gun owners schmucks.

somebody who is kicking and screaming about regulation because he really wants to buy that bedazzled piece of is a shmuck

[SnakeBoy]

Or you could, you know, just say what you think people should know.

But you never will. You don't want any discussion.

I've said it repeatedly. You just quoted me saying it again.

THE WILLFUL IGNORANCE

[Pavlov]

^^Chumpy is on here 24 hours a day. I posted this morning, he responded in seconds. I posted at noon, he responded again in seconds. Now he's still going.

Want to stop mass shootings, have the shooter correspond with Chumpy. He'll be to busy "yes I am" "No you're not" "Yes I am" "prove it" "no you prove it" for days on end to do anything.

DMC avoiding discussion at all costs.


lol tough guy

[DMC]

i dont consider gun owners schmucks.

somebody who is kicking and screaming about regulation because he really wants to buy that bedazzled piece of is a shmuck

Hyperbole also won't get you a in.

[spurraider21]

FIFY

no, not really

[DMC]

DMC avoiding discussion at all costs.


lol tough guy

10 seconds it too Chumpy to respond



Thuglife

[spurraider21]

Hyperbole also won't get you a in.

nothing will get you engaged in a substantive discussion

[Pavlov]

I've said it repeatedly. You just quoted me saying it again.

You said muh youtubes

That's not saying what people should know.

[KenMcCoy]

What about a guy carrying this into walmart



Less threatening than the 10/22?

It doesn't LOOK as scary so it's OK.

[Pavlov]

nothing will get you engaged in a substantive discussion

he's so pissed at you for calling his bluff

[DMC]

nothing will get you engaged in a substantive discussion

I gave you a fair chance and you wanted to point me to a link instead of talking, and play "100 Narrative Building Questions".

If you were interested in discussion you'd avoid the hyperbole and strawman responses.

[Pavlov]

What about a guy carrying this into walmart



Less threatening than the 10/22?

evergreen

I'm going to bog down the thread with pictures and articles about technical terms

[SnakeBoy]

i dont consider gun owners schmucks.

somebody who is kicking and screaming about regulation because he really wants to buy that bedazzled piece of is a shmuck

Still waiting on your criteria for which semi automatics are ok and which aren't. You can just say it's based on your feelings when you see the gun. It's okay.

[Pavlov]

I gave you a fair chance

[DMC]

he's so pissed at you for calling his bluff

I'd bet you even think in a lisp.

[Blake]

What if he had his out and was standing naked in your bedroom with your wife still leaking from the vag? Would you feel threatened then and if so, would it cause you to become aroused?

DMC porn mode activated

[DMC]

evergreen

Evergreen

[Pavlov]

I'd bet you even think in a lisp.

And what do you mean by that, DMC?

You shut the up about it the last time I asked.

tough guy

[spurraider21]

I gave you a fair chance and you wanted to point me to a link instead of talking, and play "100 Narrative Building Questions".

If you were interested in discussion you'd avoid the hyperbole and strawman responses.

you asked what my position was and instead of retyping what i had recently typed i linked you to the post.

i asked if you are a proponent of repealing 2A and you've squirmed about instead of committing to an answer with like "it should be proposed and we'll see how courts react to it."

i asked if you want to repeal 2A and your response was that you, individually, cannot repeal 2A. you're not even feigning legitimate discussion

[DMC]

DMC porn mode activated

Lol you see wifey rape as porn