trump impeachment watch thread

[TSA]

and the ICIG concluded the wb's complaint was legit, it's Trash's non-independent sycophant Maguire who "broke the law" by taking the wb info directly to Trash, instead of Congress. And Trash stashed it on his super-secret server.

The WB wasn’t an IC member. Maguire followed “the law”.

[ElNono]

I mean, you don't even need 'Quid pro quo', that's a red herring. The fact that he solicited the aid of a foreign country for personal gain, be political or personal, is as corrupt as it gets.

[benefactor]

Pretty much.

Completely self inflicted wound. I don't know if Rudy got him on his meds or what, completely unnecessary too.

I really am starting to think he legitimately thinks he's invincible and can do whatever he feels like doing without repercussion. Danny Greene syndrome tbh.

[ElNono]

If you read the transcript why would you falsely claim that was the favor he asked for?

Prove my claim is false. I can quote the transcript where Trump solicits the Ukrainian president to 'look into' Bidden potential misdeeds, and connecting him to his *personal lawyer* and Attorney General.

You really need a lot of mental gymnastics to pretend that didn't happen.

[TSA]

I mean, you don't even need 'Quid pro quo', that's a red herring. The fact that he solicited the aid of a foreign country for personal gain, be political or personal, is as corrupt as it gets.

You had no problem with it in 2016 when the shoe was on the other foot.

[ElNono]

If you read the transcript, it sounds like he's trying to get to the bottom of the 2016 election interference by Ukraine. Is that not legitimate?

This is baloney Darrin, and you know it. His personal lawyer has nothing to do with investigating *ANYTHING* about the 2016 election. You can't spin that.

[ElNono]

You had no problem with it in 2016 when the shoe was on the other foot.

What do you mean? Let's see my quote from 2016, please. You claim.

[TSA]

Prove my claim is false. I can quote the transcript where Trump solicits the Ukrainian president to 'look into' Bidden potential misdeeds, and connecting him to his *personal lawyer* and Attorney General.

You really need a lot of mental gymnastics to pretend that didn't happen.

Quote the part of the transcript where he asks for that as a favor.

[TSA]

What do you mean? Let's see my quote from 2016, please. You claim.

You have nothing to quote, that’s the point.

[ElNono]

You had no problem with it in 2016 when the shoe was on the other foot.

And I gather this means you retract your statement that I made a false claim?

[ElNono]

You have nothing to quote, that’s the point.

You're making the claim, not me. It's your burden of proof. I don't even know what the you conspira mind is talking about.

[TSA]

I mean, you don't even need 'Quid pro quo', that's a red herring. The fact that he solicited the aid of a foreign country for personal gain, be political or personal, is as corrupt as it gets.

Since Biden is running for President his past is off limits?

[benefactor]

[ElNono]

You made the direct assertion that I "ad no problem with it in 2016 when the shoe was on the other foot". Thus, you need to show proof of that claim.

Let's see it.

[TSA]

And I gather this means you retract your statement that I made a false claim?

Stay focused. Your false claim was about the “favor”.

[DarrinS]

Democrats and msm have zero interest in election interference by Ukraine and the origin of russiagate.

[ElNono]

Since Biden is running for President his past is off limits?

Nope. I'm on the record Biden should go down too, if any of the allegations are true.

I can quote that on this very thread.

[ElNono]

Stay focused. Your false claim was about the “favor”.

There was no false claim. He asked the Ukranian president for a favor. That's what 'look into' means.

[ElNono]

Democrats and msm have zero interest in election interference by Ukraine and the origin of russiagate.

So you agree that Rudy Giuliani, the president's personal lawyer has nothing to do with investigating anything about 'election interference'?

[TSA]

You made the direct assertion that I "ad no problem with it in 2016 when the shoe was on the other foot". Thus, you need to show proof of that claim.

Let's see it.

Wasn’t able to find a quote of you protesting the Obama admin/DNC seeking dirt on Trump in Ukraine in 2016. You can prove me wrong by showing a quote of yours. I admit my search skills here are subpar.

[ElNono]

lol @ 'stay focused' coming from somebody that got played like a fiddle by russians none the less...

[TSA]

There was no false claim. He asked the Ukranian president for a favor. That's what 'look into' means.

Quote the actual transcript. What was the favor he asked for?

[ElNono]

Wasn’t able to find a quote of you protesting the Obama admin/DNC seeking dirt on Trump in Ukraine in 2016. You can prove me wrong by showing a quote of yours. I admit my search skills here are subpar.

Obama wasn't running for re-election. Any other non-sequitur you want to throw out there?

[SnakeBoy]

Democrats and msm have zero interest in election interference by Ukraine and the origin of russiagate.

Yeah, it's fun to watch them try to navigate this minefield.

[TSA]

Obama wasn't running for re-election.

and that makes it okay