I wasn't doing commentary on me having strong opinion. I was mocking your zealous movement; but your own lack of conviction is just as entertaining.
Is it good news, Chump?
I wasn't doing commentary on me having strong opinion. I was mocking your zealous movement; but your own lack of conviction is just as entertaining.
Of course you were just voting present. I will say there was nothing wrong with the article or how those events unfolded
I've never said anything was wrong with the article, philo. I asked, is it good news?
Turn it around on yourself and answer your own question. Is it good news?
or do you vote present on your own question?
I vote this is the crusade the Chumpettes back. Yet they're to embarrassed to put their weight behind this.
You don’t get to vote for others, silly.
What’s your own vote?
Your own take on your own thing. What is it?
lol derp is super embarrassed in his own thread.
Forever present.![]()
I'm still turning table, amirite?
Keep being embarrassed, Chump.
![]()
About what? Explain.
It's your dumbass thread you made because you've never known the touch of a woman.
So you’re voting present
Keep being embarrassed, troglodyte.
You're voting embarrassed.
#NotFunnY
Philo still pretending I made an issue of the veracity of the article long after I clarified that's not the case.
Lite
You're still voting present on it.
derp
You're voting embarrassed.
dump
Voting on what?
What would make that good news?
So, you're saying it's not good news?
It's news. You can't even bring yourself to reading it so why should anyone care about your question, derp?
Is it good news or bad news?
Or you can vote embarrassed.
You already voted present and embarrassed.
You're even terrified of your own questions.
lol derp
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)